Introduction
A failing justice system
It is already the subtitle of the website.
Let’s come straight to the point:
- deliberate wrongdoing within entities in the justice system,
it mirrors madness, - elaborated in points A to O ranging from The Inconceivable to The aura of perfection.
- This includes a comprehensive 16-point overview that provides a glimpse into the essence of the website.
- One compelling example is highlighted by Lord Justice Fraser in point N where he emphasizes A cock-and-bull story with the strongest language:
‘This approach by the Post Office has amounted, in reality, to baseless assertions and denials that ignore what has actually occurred.
It amounts to the 21st-century equivalent of maintaining that the Earth is flat’
How can someone be guilty of something they didn’t do?
Please click the link
What happened?
A 14-year-old boy was sentenced to 17 years in prison
based on fabricated evidence!
Can we empathize with the excruciating pain of seven teenagers and young people and truly understand their situation?
- They are shouldering the daunting challenge of being unjustly imprisoned,
- for reasons entirely beyond their control,
- due to a flawed and unreliable justice system.
- They are grappling with the incomprehensibility of this egregious miscarriage of justice orchestrated by a corrupt cop.
- The depth and severity of the negative spiral that these innocents endure is simply unimaginable;
- it transcends human comprehension.
- No words can encapsulate the unfathomable anguish and injustice they faced.
- This is ‘a perversion of justice‘, as described in the Cambridge Dictionary, and akin to modern-day slavery.
- On someone’s watch: highlighting the responsibility and accountability for the injustice.
Note: the 4th bullet is a peculiar one.
The justice system makes it hard to remain indifferent when it perversely burdens innocent people with existential difficulties and, by abusing its position of power, subjects individuals to inhumane situations.
For example, by using fabricated evidence, as mentioned earlier in the case of 14-year-old John Bunn.
When a legal decision-maker or jury is manipulated by the prosecutor, leading to someone’s imprisonment through deceptive case presentation or withholding crucial evidence that could prove innocence, it reflects corruption within the legal system.
Individuals who engage in such practices are, themselves, criminals.
Consequently, this disruption of the legal system results in the wrongful imprisonment of innocent individuals, solely on deceptive grounds, devoid of any valid reason, cause, or basis.
- The Thin Veil of Justice: Cases That Expose Deception in the Legal System.
- People who allow themselves to be utilized for deceptive purposes!
Wanneer de persoon die een juridische beslissing neemt of een jury, bijvoorbeeld door de procureur in de val wordt gelokt om iemand in de gevangenis te krijgen door de zaak bedrieglijk voor te stellen of door hard ontlastend bewijs achter te houden, heb je te maken met een corrupt juridisch systeem als gevolg van individuen binnen het juridisch systeem die zelf misdadig zijn.
Je hebt dus te maken met het ontwrichten van het juridisch systeem door goede, onschuldige mensen die niets misdaan hebben, hun leven te verbrijzelen door hen puur op bedrieglijke basis, zonder reden, aanleiding of oorzaak in de gevangenis op te sluiten.
- De schone schijn: Zaken Die Bedrog in het Juridisch Systeem Blootleggen.
- Mensen die men kan gebruiken om bedrieglijk te werk te gaan!
Understanding an unsound or unsave conviction
is difficult because it is entirely unfounded, rooted in ideas, facts, and reasons that are incorrect.
How can someone be guilty of something they didn’t do?
It’s the pivotal question:
how can someone be guilty of something they didn’t do?
It’s incredibly strange that a false reality can be crafted, something that could be used as a basis to determine someone’s guilt.
In other words, something that appears so clear that it seems unquestionable, making it entirely believable. That is the key point and that is not always possible!
This resembles The Achilles’ heel of justice. The bag of tricks being played, the perversion of justice, comes to the surface in the following sections of the introduction, from A to P (These are 16 points).
Then 13 points in particular 1 The Liam Allan case to 13 Justice is a kind of modern-day slavery
The Achilles’ heel in its truest sense. In dozens of examples, the wrongfully convicted have been exonerated.
Het is de cruciale vraag:
hoe kan iemand schuldig zijn aan iets wat hij niet gedaan heeft?
Het is bijzonder vreemd dat het mogelijk is om een beeld te creëren dat niet overeenkomt met de werkelijkheid.
Dus iets wat gebruikt kan worden als basis om te bepalen of de persoon schuldig is.
Met andere woorden, iets dat zo duidelijk lijkt dat het op de een of andere manier niet kan worden weerlegd en daardoor volledig geloofwaardig is. Dat is het belangrijkste en dat is niet altijd mogelijk!
Dit lijkt op de achilleshiel van justitie. De trukendoos die men bespeelt, the perversion of justice, komt aan de oppervlakte in de volgende onderdelen van de inleiding, van A tot en met P (Dit zijn 16 punten).
Vervolgens 13 punten met name 1 The Liam Allan case tot en met 13 Justice is a kind of modern-day slavery
De achilleshiel in de volle betekenis van het woord. In tientallen voorbeelden zijn de onterecht veroordeelden geëxonereerd.
The innocence of 14-year-old George Stinney was disregarded,
leading to his execution on the electric chair without due legal process.
This serves as a stark example of the shortcomings within the justice system,
particularly evident in clear-cut cases, as highlighted in the introduction of this homepage.
A. Inconceivable
What you see in the video is extreme:
young, innocent children,
for example, 14 years old,
being framed in jail,
knowing that there is nothing wrong.
It is incomprehensible that someone
could knowingly do something like this
to someone else’s life.
It is ‘one of the biggest questions of justice’.
Are you still a human being?
Is this still a society?
Think of the opposite of what the 22-year-old Mamoudou did in 30 seconds
for a 4-year-old child.
In other words:
the devil that nails down
14-year-old John Bunn
where he doesn’t belong,
contrasts sharply with the heroism of
a 22-year-old who acts immediately.
This embodies ‘The law of Nature’.
John Bunn is exemplary for how the ‘power institution of justice’ is structured and how the corrupt former New York City detective Louis Scarcella effortlessly managed to destroy the life of a 14-year-old child. He is a conman, much like several others that appear on this website.
When justice fails on an epic scale, can you as a human being be indifferent?”
When you find yourself in such a situation, a derailing justice system, and to make matters worse, when justice does not apply to you and yet you are wrongly convicted, and even wrongly imprisoned, you are still bound to a blinded, derailed, and disrupted justice system.
Legal systems are both a solution and a problem. Unconstrained power can cause great injustice.
It’s almost impossible to be exonerated, as evidenced by the examples on this webpage and throughout the website, such as ‘The Putten Murder Case’ in the Netherlands.
John Bunn is exemplarisch voor hoe het ‘machtsinstituut justitie’ in elkaar zit en hoe de corrupte voormalige New York City detective Louis Scarcella, moeiteloos in staat was het leven van een 14-jarig kind kapot te maken. Hij is een oplichter, zoals er meerdere voorkomen op deze website.
Wanneer justitie op epische schaal faalt, kun je als mens onverschillig zijn?
Wanneer je in zo’n situatie terecht komt, een ontspoort justitie systeem, en tot overmaat van ramp, wanneer justitie niet op je van toepassing is en des ondanks je onterecht veroordeelt wordt, en zelfs onterecht in de gevangenis komt, dan nog zit je vastgekluisterd aan een verblind, ontspoort en ontwricht justitie systeem.
Rechtssystemen zijn zowel een oplossing als een probleem. Ongebreidelde macht kan groot onrecht veroorzaken.
Het is quasi onmogelijk om geëxondereerd te worden, zoals blijkt uit de voorbeelden op deze webpagina en doorheen de website cfr. ‘De Puttense Moordzaak’ in Nederland.
JUSTICE COURSE PREVIEW
Please listen to video 5:
Post office inquiry: Fujitsu manager called bankrupted subpostmaster ‘nasty chap’
Imagine a brilliant student at the Harvard University and taking
the outstanding course with Professor Michael Sandel.
Please enjoy listening to video 1: ‘A Lesson in Lying’ and the
following videos on this webpage: ‘The law of Nature’.
Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do?
A course at the Harvard University.
Twelve videos in The Field of Ethics.
Professor Michael Sandel is concerned with
The Questions of Justice and Fairness.
B. The essence
You can’t look away from the egregious injustice
faced by these individuals.
Indifference is not an option
when faced with such a significant and severe situation.
It is difficult. It is ‘a sign on the wall’. A Red Flag.
——–
We are dealing with a semblance of reality.
Something that appears to be real or true but is actually deceptive or not entirely genuine.
——–
For example the high-profile case of Lian Allan in Great Britain in 2016 (point 1 below)
‘puts the finger on the sore spot’,
as prosecutor Jerry Hayes himself said, “It is just sheer incompetence”.
——–
The handling of the case was neither fish nor flesh;
it didn’t meet the standards of justice,
almost as if it was a last-minute decision,
even drawing attention in the House of Commons.
——–
An appearance of reality, jaded, bewildering and surreal.
——–
A semblance, an appearance of reality,
in Dutch ‘een schijnwerkelijkheid’.
——–
Framing
Framing is when you subtly steer people toward a certain interpretation by highlighting specific aspects of a subject. It involves selectively presenting information, emphasizing particular elements of a topic or person to create a specific impression, whether in speech or in writing.
In other words Cherry-picking: a tactic where pieces of evidence, statements, facts, or similar situations are selectively mentioned to defend a particular standpoint.
Framing
Met framing, het benadrukken van bepaalde aspecten van een onderwerp, wordt mensen ongemerkt een bepaalde interpretatie opgedrongen. Daarbij selectieve informatie: bepaalde aspecten van een onderwerp of persoon worden benadrukt, waarmee een spreker of schrijver een bepaald beeld creëert.
M.a.w. Cherrypicking; een tactiek waarbij bewijzen, uitspraken, feiten of vergelijkbare situaties selectief genoemd worden om een bepaald standpunt te verdedigen.
When there is framing or cherry-picking, someone playing the role of The Devils Advocate is a good idea.
Cherry-picking
- Notice the wrongful prosecution against Liam Allan, the 19-year-old criminology student in Great Britain in 2016, is based on cherry-picking of a ridiculous false accusation. (Liam Allan is the subtitle and template of the website.)
- Although the police couldn’t ignore the irrefutable evidence, stemming from the complete download of messages from a former girlfriend 7 months prior, which they possessed.
- In other words, this is a serious systemic flaw within the judicial system.
- In September 2015, Liam Allan started university. Reading for a Criminology and Criminal Psychology degree, he was just like any other fresher. But just a few months into his course, he was accused of rape.
- It became a high profile case. Articles in The Times, the BBC and even a question in the House of Commons to Prime Minister Theresa May. Cfr. The making of.
Cherry-picking
- Bemerk de oneigenlijke vervolging tegen Liam Allan, de 19-jarige criminologiestudent in Groot-Brittannië in 2016, berust op cherry-picking van een idiote valse beschuldiging. (Liam Allan is de subtitel en de template van de website.)
- Hoewel de politie niet om het onweerlegbare bewijs heen kon, afkomstig uit de volledige download van berichten van een vroegere vriendin 7 maanden daarvoor, waarover ze beschikten.
- Met andere woorden, dit is een ernstige systeemfout binnen het justitiële systeem.
- In september 2015 begon Liam Allan aan de universiteit. Hij studeerde criminologie en criminele psychologie en was net als elke andere nieuweling. Maar al na een paar maanden werd hij beschuldigd van verkrachting.
- Het werd een high profile case. Artikels in de Times, de BBC en zelfs een vraag in The House of Commons aan Prime Minister Theresa May. Cfr. The making of.
The basis for Liam’s prosecution relied on paper-thin evidence, which, as Jerry Hayes put it, came dangerously close to resulting in a wrongful conviction. The justice system seemed almost like Candid Camera. Justice, like a two-edged sword, highlighted the precariousness of the situation. It’s just sheer incompetence. This illustrates the gravity and fragility of our justice system in specific cases.
On a lighter note, have you seen the hilarious ‘Exploding iPhone Prank’ from Candid Camera?
The situation echoed the eerie authenticity of a Candid Camera episode, where individuals, unsuspecting and enveloped in the smoke of a false reality, believed in the impending explosion, much like how baseless allegations almost ensnared Liam Allan in a wrongful conviction, showcasing the fragile trust within our justice system.
De situatie weerspiegelde het griezelige realisme van een aflevering van Candid Camera, waar individuen, onwetend en omhuld door de rook van een valse realiteit, geloofden in de dreigende explosie, net zoals ongegronde beschuldigingen bijna Liam Allan in een onterechte veroordeling deden belanden, waarbij het fragiele vertrouwen in ons rechtssysteem aan het licht kwam.
Consider the British Post Office scandal
and numerous cases featured on this homepage
and throughout the website;
they all serve as prime examples where everything
has gone wrong in terms of justice.
C. Clarification note
Raphael Rowe tells the story of
how he spent 12 years in prison
for crimes he did not commit.
Raphael is a clear indication or warning of something that is very wrong
in the justice system.
A Red Flag.
He was about 19.
Nobody wants to be fed lies. It’s better to be honest when you see how the justice system disfigures people by imprisoning them when they’re innocent.
When justice goes wrong, it goes quite wrong.
Notice the word ‘orchestrated’ in the 4 points at the top of the page.
Not only Raphael Rowe is a sign on the wall, all examples throughout the website are an indication and a serious warning.
Calling something like this an exception is wrong!
Transparency and truthfulness are crucial to prevent the injustice of imprisoning those who haven’t committed any crimes.
Niemand wil blaasjes wijsgemaakt worden. Je kan beter eerlijk zijn als je ziet hoe het justitie systeem mensen verminkt door ze onschuldig op te sluiten.
Als justitie in de fout gaat, gaat het behoorlijk fout.
Bemerk ‘orchestrated’ in de 4 punten bovenaan de webpagina.
Niet alleen Raphael Rowe is een teken aan de wand, alle voorbeelden doorheen de website zijn een indicatie en ernstige waarschuwing.
Het is fout zoiets een uitzondering te noemen!
Transparantie en waarachtigheid zijn cruciaal om te voorkomen dat onschuldige mensen worden opgesloten.
Trust is a judgement
that someone else can be relied upon or
that some institution can relied on.
It isn’t proof.
Trust is what we do when we need a shortcut.
Please listen to the BBC MP3 of philosopher, Onora O’Neill.
The big idea: the new distrust (about 10 minutes)
When you use justice in a negative way like in the cases of
John Bunn, Raphael Rowe, Liam Allan,
the list of 9 examples point 3 below, and so forth,
you automatically get such peculiar orchestrated results.
Wanneer je justitie op een negatieve manier gebruikt,
zoals in de gevallen van John Bunn, Raphael Rowe, Liam Allan,
de lijst van 9 voorbeelden point 3 below hieronder, enzovoort,
krijg je automatisch zulke eigenaardige georkestreerde resultaten.
D. No-nonsense
Sheldon Thomas was just 16
when he was convicted
on basis of a photo and
it was not him
december 2004.
19 year innocent in prison.
He was 35 when he came free.
Thomas was “denied due process at every stage.”
The case was based on 100% lies.
In the examples on this current page and throughout the website, we are continuously confronted with orchestrated, manipulated, or deceptive decisions without legality.
Authenticity: what’s real and what’s fake.
There are plenty of examples where justice is used as a toy, where justice fools someone.
It is all about dishonesty.
There is a problem, a big, big problem.
The way of looking at the justice system is not right, as explained in the above-mentioned explanation ‘The essence’.
In the reopened trial, the prosecution ruled that the police, prosecutors and judge of the original trial knew from the beginning that the photo in the sequence was not the Sheldon Thomas they arrested. Nevertheless, they went ahead. In addition, a group of 32 black law students examined the photo of Thomas. 27 students said, correctly, that the arrested Sheldon Thomas was not seen in the photos.
One can sabotage justice, even on a large scale, the case
The Post Office Wrongful Convictions Scandal
is exemplary. People know that the justice system is susceptible to fraud. This webpage and the entire website are living proof of that.
Furthermore, lower-standing database in point 3 with over 3400 examples of exonerated individuals with case descriptions and a brief summary at the top.
Among others, the Nijmegen-based Emeritus Professor of Philosophy of Science, Ton Derksen, who overturned the conviction of Lucia de Berk, after she had been wrongly imprisoned for 6 years, and is increasingly involved in revisions, uses the term judicial fraud and the pitfalls of truth-finding that underlie it.
Andrew Makinson – wrongly imprisoned for 17 years – unsafe conviction
In het heropende proces heeft de aanklager geoordeeld dat de politie, aanklagers en rechter van het oorspronkelijke proces vanaf het begin wisten dat de foto in de reeks niet de Sheldon Thomas was die ze hadden gearresteerd. Toch zijn ze doorgegaan. Bovendien heeft een groep van 32 zwarte rechtenstudenten de foto van Thomas onderzocht. 27 studenten zeiden terecht dat de gearresteerde Sheldon Thomas niet te zien was op de foto’s.
Men kan justitie saboteren, zelfs op grote schaal
The Post Office Wrongful Convictions Scandal
is desbetreffend exemplarisch. Men weet dat justitie fraudegevoelig is. Deze webpagina en de hele website is daarvan het levende bewijs.
Daarbij lagerstaande database in punt 3 met meer dan 4300 voorbeelden van geëxoneerden met beschrijving van de zaak en korte samenvatting bovenaan.
O.a. de Nijmweegse Emeritus hoogleraar Wetenschapsfilosoof Ton Derksen die de veroordeling van Lucia de Berk ongedaan maakte, nadat ze al 6 jaar onterecht in de cel zat, en bij steeds meer herzieningen wordt betrokken gebruikt de term justitiefraude en de valkuilen van waarheidsvinding die daaraan ten grondslag liggen.
Andrew Makinson – wrongly imprisoned for 17 years – unsafe conviction
E. Slip through the cracks
A 14-year-old child, ‘George Stinney’ (1944),
executed on the electric chair.
Without a speck of fairness.
It’s a hallmark of the the ‘power institution of justice’.
——–
In point ‘2: A Devilish Construction’ below, Louis Taylor,
a 16-year-old, went from being a hero to becoming
a scapegoat, spending 41 years in prison.
Decisions are made based on ignorance. One cannot imagine it. It is incomprehensible.
Almost 100 years after ‘The Scottsboro Boys’ (1931), the justice system is still trapped in a wrong pattern. Even when everyone knows well what the undeniable reality is, an inherently wrong decision arises.
The harmony of the lives of children, young people, and individuals is, in an impossible and brutal manner, irreversibly altered in a single moment.
Even for the rest of their lives. From the splendor of life to hell in the blink of an eye. It’s an uncomfortable truth.
Men beslist op basis van onwetendheid. Men kan het zich niet voorstellen. Het is niet te begrijpen.
Bijna 100 jaar na ‘The Scottsboro Boys’ (1931) zit men bij justitie nog altijd vast in een fout patroon. Zelfs wanneer iedereen goed weet wat de onomstotelijke werkelijkheid is, onstaat er een intrinsiek foute beslissing.
De harmonie van het leven van kinderen, jongeren en mensen wordt op een onmogelijke wijze, brutaal, op een onherstelbare wijze, in één enkel ogenblik verandert.
Zelfs voor de rest van het leven. Van de glans van het leven bij het knippen van de vinger naar de hel. Het is een ongemakkelijke waarheid.
F. An Inconvenient Truth
In the coal mines of India, tens of thousands of children are forced to work in ‘rat holes’ – tiny pits too small for adults to reach.
Why are the authorities turning a blind eye to this lethal and illegal practice?
Please click (the link below the image), watch, and listen to the lives of these two young boys in a 22-minute video.
It captures a defining moment – the place where they belong.
Let children be children.
It’s about school with friends, their growth, and the education they deserve.
The Bible shockingly articulates
the uncomfortable truth of exploiting a child
(as in the video) through the metaphor of
a millstone around the neck
and being cast into
The link provides an overview of hundreds of web pages, subjects and themes.
It’s easy to browse through the website in this way.
De link geeft een overzicht van honderden webpagina’s, onderwerpen en thema’s.
Het is makkelijk om op deze manier doorheen de website te browsen.
The living conditions, housing,
and the reality for these two 12-year-old boys
working in Indian coal mines are appalling.
In other words, their situation is distressing
and shocking due to the harshness
of their work environment.
Please watch the video
It’s like what is depicted by the 12 links next to the image.
It’s like worthless legal decisions highlighted on the website.
Please reread the first three lines of point B above, considering the contents of this ‘Inconvenient Truth’.
Important link
The sheer brutality and inhumanity, representing the darkest facets of modern-day slavery, encapsulate the unfathomable injustice and pain inflicted upon Nsala and his family – a testament to the appalling atrocities committed by fellow humans in 1904. The passage highlights events that occurred during the exploitation era in Belgian Congo.
Which image is extremely strong?
While the the atrocities in the Congo Free State and subsequently in Belgian Congo remained hidden from the public eye until a few years ago, the flaws within courtrooms and halls of justice continue to stay concealed. Examples of egregious judicial failures are illustrated on this homepage and throughout the website.
Belangrijke link
De pure wreedheid en onmenselijkheid, die de donkerste facetten van moderne slavernij vertegenwoordigen, vatten het onpeilbare onrecht en de pijn samen die werden toegebracht aan Nsala en zijn familie – een bewijs van de verschrikkelijke wreedheden die in 1904 door medemensen werden begaan. De passage belicht de gebeurtenissen tijdens de uitbuitingsperiode in Belgisch Congo.
Which image is extremely strong?
Terwijl De wreedheden in de Congo Free State en daaropvolgend in Belgisch Congo tot voor enkele jaren verborgen bleef voor het grote publiek, blijft wat fout is in rechtbanken en justitiepaleizen verborgen. Voorbeelden van vreselijke mislukkingen van justitie worden geïllustreerd op deze homepage en door de hele website heen.
G. When ‘the veil of ignorance’ disappears
Exculpatory evidence
Evidence that supports a defendant’s innocence, which must be given to the defense by prosecutors unasked; if this rule is broken, the verdict could be overturned.
There is so much injustice in the justice system.
How to use “exculpatory evidence” in a sentence
- The defense lawyer strongly believes that the withheld surveillance footage is critical exculpatory evidence.
- The judge ordered the prosecution to provide all exculpatory evidence to the defense prior to trial.
- Overlooked exculpatory evidence was found which led to the defendant’s appeal for a new trial.
Deliberate mistakes
One can employ legal means to do wrong things
Particularly when it can disrupt society, irreversibly negatively affect the life of a child or young person, or impact the existential reality of a human life (as expressed in point e of this introduction in the text of 4 paragraphs, with the example of the Scottsboro Boys).
The use of the word ‘exception’ is incorrect
The disaster with The Herald of Free Enterprise in 1987 in Zeebrugge, The Fireworks Disaster in Enschede on Saturday, May 13, 2000, the initial verdict in The Rodney King Trial that led to the 1992 riots in Los Angeles, The Crash of Germanwings Flight 9525 on March 24, 2015, and similar incidents cannot be considered as exceptions.
Particularly, the 9 examples of an unjust conviction in the lower point 3 are also not an exception. As Barry Scheck put it in the case of Michael Morton, they were good lawyers. However, a prosecutor who withheld exculpatory evidence and was subsequently convicted for it. The difficulties faced by Belgian princess Delphine and The Chambermaid in the DSK Case, even though there was no doubt, are likewise not an exception.
It can happen that in your own environment, there are issues that closely resemble a pattern of what you see on the website, like two peas in a pod.
Justice experts, upright professionals, and profoundly knowledgeable individuals aware of the failures within the justice system and the shocking consequences thereof, as evidenced by examples on this webpage and throughout the website, openly acknowledge what is at hand.
You can’t fool anyone.
It occurs that a blatant and clear deceptive construction has been put in place.
This aligns with thousands of cases of exonerated individuals where, in hindsight, after decades, it becomes evident that an unquestionably erroneous verdict was rendered, one that cannot be overlooked.
An orchestrated, manipulated, or deceptive incident has taken place.
When this happens to oneself or when it affects the innocence of a child, causing unbearable pain as seen in numerous examples, an insurmountable existential issue arises.
Het kan gebeuren dat in je eigen omgeving, er kwesties zijn die als twee druppels water gelijken op een patroon van wat je in de website ziet.
Justitie-experts, integere professionals en ernstig onderlegde personen met kennis van het falen van justitie en de schokkende gevolgen daarvan, zoals voorbeelden op deze webpagina en doorheen de website, erkennen openlijk wat er aan de hand is.
Men kan geen blaasjes wijsmaken.
Het komt voor dat er flagrant en duidelijk een bedrieglijke constructie in elkaar is gezet.
Dit komt overeen met duizenden gevallen van geexonereerde personen waarbij achteraf, na tientallen jaren, blijkt dat er een onomstotelijk foutief vonnis is geveld, waar men onmogelijk aan voorbij kan gaan.
Er heeft een georkestreerd, gemanipuleerd of bedrieglijk incident plaatsgevonden.
Wanneer dit jezelf overkomt of wanneer het de onschuld van een kind treft en ondraaglijke pijn veroorzaakt, zoals in vele voorbeelden, dan ontstaat er een onoverkomelijke existentiële kwestie.
Labeling the two Boeing 737 Max crashes as exceptions is incorrect, as it is argued that a plane crash usually involves a combination of causes, with backup systems in place for various scenarios. However, this wasn’t the case for the Boeing 737 Max concerning the crash’s cause. Furthermore, the entire system used to certify the aircraft was fundamentally flawed for the Boeing 737 Max.
The two fatal crashes involving the Boeing 737 Max occurred in October 2018 and March 2019.
These events point to larger systemic issues
rather than being isolated anomalies.
It highlights their importance in understanding
broader patterns or problems
within their respective contexts.
Wrongful convictions are rather
symptomatic of larger problems
within the justice system.
Deze gebeurtenissen wijzen op grotere systemische problemen
in plaats van geïsoleerde anomalieën te zijn.
Het benadrukt hun belang in het begrijpen van
bredere patronen of problemen
binnen hun respectieve contexten.
Ten onrechte veroordelingen zijn eerder
symptomatisch voor grotere problemen
binnen het rechtssysteem.
Justice demands honesty,
as evidenced by the points on this initial webpage.
Take, for instance,
The Post Office Wrongful Convictions Scandal,
where over 730 individuals were wrongly convicted,
hundreds accepted settlements, and some even took their own lives.
Ultimately, the highest court in the UK ruled in a damning manner,
considering that the true issue had been well-known since the very beginning (2007).
They lied persistently, deceiving hundreds of people whose lives were shattered. And so on…
When the system fails, you end up in nothing short of Modern Day Slavery.
H. To put a spoke in someone’s wheel
No matter how innocent you are. No matter how clear it is that you had nothing to do with it. And that you weren’t even there when something happened. Even if your entire life history shows that you cannot be labeled as a bad person, nothing helps when you end up in a deceitful justice system.
Like in the case of Julan Catalan, who spent 6 months in prison. This was his fate for the rest of his life. It’s coincidence, one in a million, that saved him. Something like that has nothing more to do with a justice system.
The impossibility of proving your innocence!
With a false testimony and a construction fabricated by 2 LAPD cops, Juan Catalan is framed at the scene of the murder.
How do you prove that you weren’t there at the time of the murder? It’s impossible to counter that.
The coincidence of being filmed at the baseball game station with 56,000 spectators, at the place where Juan Catalan was with his little daughter, and exactly at that moment.
By contacting the cellphone provider and pinpointing the cell tower near Dodger Stadium that Juan’s phone was pinging, as well as researching Juan’s calls with his girlfriend Alma that evening, the lawyer Melnik was able to determine that Juan was still at the stadium at 10:12 p.m.
Juan Catalan narrowly escapes trouble with the exceptional dedication of his lawyer. Saved From Crooked Cops and Lying Prosecutor.
The president of Duke University offers an apology for the handling of the Lacrosse scandal.
De onmogelijkheid om je onschuld te bewijzen!
Met een vals getuigenis en een constructie gefabriceerd door 2 LAPD cops wordt Juan Catalan geframed op de plaats van de moord.
Hoe bewijs je dat je daar niet was op het moment van de moord? Het is onmogelijk daar tegen op te tornen.
Het toeval dat er gefilmd wordt in het baseball game station met 56 000 toeschouwers, op de plaats waar Juan Catalan met zijn dochtertje was én precies op dit moment.
Door contact op te nemen met de mobiele provider en de zendmast in de buurt van Dodger Stadium te lokaliseren waar Juan’s telefoon contact mee maakte, en door het onderzoeken van Juan’s gesprekken met zijn vriendin Alma die avond, slaagde advocaat Melnik erin vast te stellen dat Juan om 22:12 uur nog steeds in het stadion was.
Juan Catalan kruipt door het oog van een naald met behulp van de uitzonderlijke inzet van zijn advocaat. Gered van corrupte agenten en liegende aanklager.
De president van de Duke University biedt excuses aan voor de afhandeling van het Lacrosse-schandaal.
The Guildford Four,
The Birmingham Six – 1974 – Who cares?,
Two cases in Great Britain where practices were employed that one cannot fathom, resulting in the wrongful imprisonment of innocents for 15 years.
In the case of The Birmingham Six, Prime Minister Tony Blair had to publicly apologize for the injustice caused by the judiciary.
Saint Omer, near Calais in northern France.
In the Saint Omer case, 17 people were imprisoned for 4 years based on one person giving false testimony.
The case became known as ‘The Birmingham Six of France.
When there are signs that justice is doing wrong things,
one should handle that situation with caution.
——–
It happens that one notices orchestrated and even
blatantly deceitful actions taking place…
——–
Filing a lawsuit without grounds is ‘A Red Flag’.
Justice is not a fairy tale.
Exploring instances where justice seems to fall short
or where its application might be unexpected or
controversial can provoke insightful discussions.
I. The goose that lays the golden eggs
1 Reactions Of INNOCENT Convicts SET FREE!
2 apr 2023
For copyright matters, please contact: juliabaker0312@gmail.com
Welcome to the Discoverize! Here, we dive into the most exciting and unbelievable things that the world has to offer. From ancient artifacts to mind-blowing scientific theories, there’s never a dull moment on our channel. Join us as we embark on a thrilling journey of discovery and wonder, and get ready to have your socks knocked off by the amazing things that we uncover. Whether you’re a lifelong learner or just looking for a good time, our channel is sure to entertain and educate. Buckle up and get ready for an unforgettable ride!
Similar to numerous instances highlighted on this homepage and across the website, there’s a trend where issues considered ‘indisputable and beyond question’ lead to an artificial construct within the realm of justice – a detached ivory tower, removed from life’s simple realities.
Put simply, much like the earlier point: Juan Catalan fell victim to elements within the justice system, enduring a 6-month prison sentence until lawyer Melnik unravelled the intricately woven web, akin to finding a needle in a haystack.
This serves as an example where financial resolution seems unattainable. Yet, akin to the Good Samaritan, the lawyer undertook what was necessary, ultimately resolving the case.
Another illustration lies in the case involving Belgian Princess Delphine versus King Albert II, a legal battle spanning approximately 20 years, involving 7 years in court. Albert II even appealed to the highest court twice and adamantly refused to provide his DNA until the court imposed a 5000 euro daily fine for non-compliance. It wasn’t until this penalty was enforced that a swift resolution emerged, despite Albert II’s legal team’s desire to prolong proceedings.
In essence, justice becomes akin to
a goose laying golden eggs,
an asset lawyers are reluctant to sacrifice,
artificially prolonging cases for financial gain.
Likewise, we can observe a similar situation in the well-known case involving DSK at the Sofitel Hotel in New York. Private detectives were employed as a deus ex machina, fabricating an artificial portrayal of the chambermaid, aimed at securing DSK’s release from prison. This incident prolonged for a total of 98 days. Subsequently, in a civil proceeding, DSK opted for a settlement, implying an acknowledgment of guilt, mirroring the case of King Albert II, where justice was seemingly manipulated in an entirely contrived manner.
Zoals in talloze voorbeelden op deze home pagina en doorheen de website, gebeurt het dat in kwesties die “absoluut duidelijk zijn, die niet kunnen onkent worden en niet kunnen in vraag gesteld worden” dat je bij justitie in een kunstmatige wereld terecht komt, de ivoren toren, wereldvreemd tegenover de eenvoudige werkelijkheid van het leven.
M.a.w. zoals in het vorige punt: Juan Catalan werd bedrogen door entiteiten binnen justitie, zat daardoor 6 maanden in de gevangenis en het was door de advocaat Melnik dat de kunstmatig in elkaar gestoken verwarde knoop ontward werd als de spelt in de hooiberg.
Dit is een van de voorbeelden die financieel onmogelijk op te lossen zijn, doch als de barmhartige samartitaan heeft deze advocaat gedaan wat nodig was en de zaak werd opgelost.
De lagerstaande kwestie van de Belgische Princes Dellphine tegenover koning Albert II, die ongeveer 20 jaar heeft aangesleept, waarvan 7 jaar in de rechtbank, waarbij Albert II zelfs tweemaal in cassatie gaat en weigert zijn DNA af te staan, tot de rechtbank een dwangsom oplegt van 5000 euro per dag dat Albert II weigert zijn DNA af te staan en dan is alles onmiddellijk opgelost. Rekening houdend dat zelfs dan nog de advocaten van Albert II nog wilden verderdoen.
M.a.w. justitie staat gelijk aan
de kip met de gouden eieren
die advocaten niet willen slachten,
om op een kunstmatige manier het geld binnen te rijven.
Idem heb je ook de lager staande kwestie van DSK in het Sofitel Hotel in New York. Privédetectives die als deus ex machina gebruikt worden om een kunstmatig beeld te creëren van het kamermeisje, om op die manier DSK vrij te krijgen uit de gevangen. Een kwestie die uiteindelijk 98 dagen heeft geduurd. In een burgerlijke procedure is DSK dan tot een schikking is gekomen, m.a.w. de schuld van het misdrijf staat vast, net zoals in het gebeuren van Koning Albert II die justitie op een totaal kunstmatige manier heeft gebruikt.
“DSK Maid” Tells of Her Alleged Rape by Strauss-Kahn: Exclusive
‘To see the speck in another’s eye, but not the beam in one’s own’.
J. The red line or
the line in the sand
Both the former prosecutor and police detective leading Johnson’s case testified they had no evidence connecting Johnson to the murder. The conviction rested solely on Elking picking Johnson out of a lineup based upon Elking’s memory of seeing the masked gunman’s eyes for a few seconds — and it took Elking four times of viewing the same lineup to do it.
“You had a witness in this case who told you…at best he could recognize maybe something about the eyes,” Mason said to former detective Joseph Nickerson during the December hearing. “Are you sure this isn’t a situation where you guys were in a little bit of a rush to make a conviction?”
Please listen to video’s about the case Lamar Johnson
Wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice are tragic examples of the flaws or misuse of the justice system.
Sometimes, due to various reasons such as flawed evidence, bias, procedural errors, or even intentional malpractice, innocent individuals can be wrongfully convicted and imprisoned for crimes they didn’t commit.
These cases highlight the complexity and imperfections within the justice system. The phrase “justice is a two-edged sword” can apply here, illustrating how justice, when applied incorrectly or through flawed processes, can bring about severe harm and suffering to innocent individuals.
It showcases the dual nature of justice, where its application can have both positive outcomes when rightly served and devastating consequences when applied erroneously or unfairly.
Wrongful convictions underscore the importance of ensuring fair trials, proper investigation, unbiased proceedings, and continuous efforts to prevent and rectify miscarriages of justice. It’s a poignant reminder of the need for constant vigilance and improvement within legal systems to mitigate such injustices.
In Lamar Johnson’s case, reliance on eyewitness accounts was crucial, yet the circumstances, including the shooting in darkness and the perpetrators wearing masks, cast doubt on the accuracy of identifications. Complicating matters, an eyewitness later recanted, adding complexity. Johnson offered an alibi, presenting multiple facets for the jury to consider.
In het geval van Lamar Johnson was het sterk leunen op ooggetuigenverslagen essentieel, maar de omstandigheden, waaronder de schietpartij in het donker en de daders die maskers droegen, brachten twijfel over de nauwkeurigheid van de identificaties. Het werd ingewikkelder doordat een ooggetuige later zijn verklaring introk, wat complexiteit toevoegde. Johnson presenteerde een alibi en bood meerdere facetten aan de jury ter overweging.
K. The arc of the moral universe
will bend toward justice – but only if we pull it
You are 29 and without any data you spend 28 years in prison.
Shortly after his arrest, Detective Doug Acker told Hinton,
“I don’t care whether you did or didn’t do it. In fact,
I believe you didn’t do it. But it doesn’t matter.
If you didn’t do it, one of your brothers did.
And you’re going to take the rap.”
“I can give you five reasons why they are going to convict you.
- Number one, you’re black.
- Number two, a white man gonna say you shot him.
- Number three, you’re gonna have a white district attorney.
- Number four, you’re gonna have a white judge.
- And number five, you’re gonna have an all-white jury.”
In what precedes, we have a series of examples where the justice system shows an incredibly difficult course, despite the fact that in all these examples, the individuals mistreated by the justice system cannot be linked to what is happening. It is remarkable what is happening within the justice system.
Throughout the entire course of such a legal affair, numerous complications can arise, causing furrowed brows, ultimately resulting in someone who knows nothing about it being put in great difficulty.
In wat vooraf gaat hebben we een reeks voorbeelden waar justitie een onvoorstelbaar moeilijk verloop vertoont, ondanks in al deze voorbeelden de personen die door justitie fout behandeld worden, niet in verband kunnen gebracht worden met wat er aan de hand is. Het is merkwaardig wat er bij justitie gebeurt.
Anthony Ray Hinton (born June 1, 1956) was wrongly convicted of the 1985 murders of two fast food restaurant managers in Birmingham, Alabama. Hinton was sentenced to death and held on the state’s death row for 28 years before his 2015 release.
In 2014 the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously overturned his conviction on appeal, after which the state dropped all charges against him. The court was unable to affirm the forensic evidence of a gun, which was the only evidence in the first trial. After being released, Hinton wrote and published a memoir The Sun Does Shine: How I Found Life and Freedom on Death Row (2018). Hinton was portrayed by O’Shea Jackson Jr. in the 2019 film Just Mercy.
L. Bread and Circuses
There was a significant scandal involving the British Post Office known as the “Post Office Horizon IT Scandal.”
In this scandal, subpostmasters were wrongly accused of theft, fraud, and false accounting due to issues with the Horizon accounting system, which was used by the Post Office.
The Horizon system, introduced in the early 2000s, had software glitches that led to discrepancies in accounting records. Many subpostmasters faced financial losses, bankruptcy, and legal troubles as a result of being held responsible for these discrepancies. The scandal came to light, and there were efforts to review and rectify the unjust convictions.
Subsequently, in 2021, the UK Court of Appeal overturned the convictions of many subpostmasters, acknowledging the flaws in the Horizon system and the impact on these individuals’ lives. The scandal highlighted concerns about the use of technology in legal matters and the need for a fair and just system.
De Britse Post Office-affaire, ook bekend als de “Post Office Horizon IT Scandal”, betrof onterechte beschuldigingen aan het adres van subpostmasters voor diefstal, fraude en valse boekhouding als gevolg van problemen met het Horizon-boekhoudsysteem dat door de Britse Post Office werd gebruikt.
Het Horizon-systeem, geïntroduceerd in het begin van de jaren 2000, vertoonde softwarefouten die tot onregelmatigheden in de boekhoudgegevens leidden. Veel subpostmasters leden financiële verliezen, gingen failliet en kregen juridische problemen doordat ze verantwoordelijk werden gehouden voor deze onregelmatigheden. Het schandaal kwam aan het licht, en er waren inspanningen om de onrechtvaardige veroordelingen te herzien en recht te zetten.
In 2021 heeft het Britse Hof van Beroep de veroordelingen van veel subpostmasters vernietigd, waarbij erkend werd dat er gebreken waren in het Horizon-systeem en dat dit ernstige gevolgen had gehad voor het leven van deze personen. Het schandaal bracht zorgen aan het licht over het gebruik van technologie in juridische zaken en de noodzaak van een eerlijk en rechtvaardig systeem.
LIFE IS NOT EASY!
HOW TO HANDLE AN EXCEPTIONAL SITUATION?
3 Chocolate Milkshake: The Power of Hope
2 Post Office scandal: Fujitsu staff knew about bugs, errors and defects in the system for years
Back to menu IMPORTENT CONTENT Listening recommended Must ***
19 jan 2024
The European boss of Fujitsu has admitted the company “clearly let society down” as he apologised again to subpostmasters and postmistresses over its role in the Horizon scandal.
Giving evidence to the public inquiry, Paul Patterson said Fujitsu staff had known about bugs, errors and defects in the system for years – but claimed the firm only became aware “latterly” that faulty data was being used in prosecutions.
Doomed from the very start, which was known by all parties
At minute 4: armed with all the knownledge, why not shoot it of the roof tops?
At minute 5: a massive cover up
At minute 6: alerted insurers in 2013, stopped prosecutions in 2014
At minute 7: a lot more than just money
- The Great British Post Office Wrongful Convictions Scandal is a kind of Candid Camera set in real life.
- A false image is deliberately created to falsely accuse people.
- Playing up appearances. An artificial event.
- In reality, it is internet problems that cause transactions to be lost.
- Het grote Britse postkantoorschandaal met onterechte veroordelingen is een soort Candid Camera die zich in het echte leven afspeelt.
- Op een bewuste wijze wordt een verkeerd beeld gecreëerd om mensen vals te beschuldigen.
- Het spelen van de schone schijn. Een kunstmatig gebeuren.
- In werkelijkheid zijn het internet problemen die oorzaak zijn dat transacties verloren gaan.
Please listen to more video’s by Bryan Stevenson
4 Falsely Accused Former Postmasters: ‘Money Doesn’t Come with an Erase Button.’| Good Morning Britain
Back to menu IMPORTENT CONTENT Listening recommended Must ***
11 jan 2024
Parmod Kalia and Janet Skinner were both wrongly convicted following false accusations of stealing thousands of pounds from their respective post offices. Despite having their convictions quashed in 2021 they are still waiting for compensation.
Former Postmaster Parmod Kalia was sentenced to six months in jail after being falsely accused of stealing £22,000.
Former sub-postmaster Janet Skinner served three months of a nine-month sentence in prison after being falsely accused of stealing almost £60,000 from the Post Office she ran.
Broadcast on 11/01/24
Both 3 months in prison
5 Post office inquiry: Fujitsu manager called bankrupted subpostmaster ‘nasty chap’
18 jan 2024
A Fujitsu employee called a subpostmaster who was bankrupted by the company’s faulty computer system a “nasty chap” in not-seen-before email sent internally in 2003.
Peter Sewell, who was in the Post Office Account Security Team at Fujitsu, said that Lee Carrington was a “nasty man” after the subpostmaster had threatened the company with legal action after losing all his money due to no fault of his own.
Fujitsu provided the Post Office with the Horizon computer system for individual subpostmasters. This system wrongly said that hundreds of subpostmasters had been committing fraud and more than 700 were wrongly convicted.
The email was revealed at the ongoing Post Office Horizon Inquiry.
A culture of
‘hanging someone out to dry’
prevailed in the British Post Office
during the IT Horizon scandal,
where victims were wrongly prosecuted over many years.
The Post Office lied on an industrial scale to ministers,
resulting in a total mess.
The strategy is made clear e.g. in the email from Peter Sewell,
a Fujistu boss, to Andy Dunk,
the witness for the court,
with the pep talk about Lee Caslteton which
he called a nasty chap, and the answer from Dunks:
“Thank you for those very kind and encouraging words.
I had to pause halfway through reading it to wipe away a small tear.“
Hang someone out to dry:
To allow someone to be punished, criticized,
or made to suffer in a way that is unfair, without trying to help them.
Please listen to video 5 above ‘Post office inquiry:
Fujitsu manager called bankrupted subpostmaster ‘nasty chap’
The video reveals an
appalling and shameful
attitude exhibited by Peter Sewell.
There is one rule in this country for those in power
and another for those who don’t have it.
The Post Office Scandal is deeply instructive
regarding the organization of our society
for both those who possess power
and those who lack it.
6 Labour MP corners Post Office bosses over dodgy bonus culture in fiery Select Committee exchange
Back to menu IMPORTENT CONTENT Listening recommended Must ***
Head honchos at the Post Office and members of their remuneration committee were in front of the Business and Trade Select Committee on Tuesday, where chair of the Committee Darren Jones absolutely rinsed them over an apparent breach of rules related to the awarding of bonuses – which can lead to years in jail if found guilty.
1. The poor – work & work.
2. The rich – exploit the poor.
3. The soldier – protects both.
4. The taxpayer – pays for all three.
5. The banker – robs all four.
6. The lawyer – misleads all five.
7. The doctor – bills all six.
8. The goons – scare all seven.
9. The Politician – lives happily
on account of all eight.
Written in 43 B.C. Valid even today!
7 Former Fujitsu manager calls errors a ‘contractual problem’ in Post Office scandal inquiry
Back to menu IMPORTENT CONTENT Listening recommended Must ***
10 jan 2024
Iain Dale and his Cross Question panel discuss what’s next for the Post Office scandal after the company’s former boss, Paula Vennells, announced she’d be handing back her CBE with immediate effect.
Our Cross Question panel: Mims Davies (Minister for Disabled People, Health and Work, and Conservative MP for Mid Sussex), Darren Jones (Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury and Labour MP for Bristol North West), Emma Sinclair (Tech entrepreneur – who is the chief executive of EnterpriseAlumni), Oli Dugmore (Head of News and Politics at JOE Media, and LBC presenter).
8 Post Office scandal is ‘deeply instructive’ about how the UK works | LBC debate
Back to menu IMPORTENT CONTENT Listening recommended Must ***
10 jan 2024
Iain Dale and his Cross Question panel discuss what’s next for the Post Office scandal after the company’s former boss, Paula Vennells, announced she’d be handing back her CBE with immediate effect.
Our Cross Question panel: Mims Davies (Minister for Disabled People, Health and Work, and Conservative MP for Mid Sussex), Darren Jones (Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury and Labour MP for Bristol North West), Emma Sinclair (Tech entrepreneur – who is the chief executive of EnterpriseAlumni), Oli Dugmore (Head of News and Politics at JOE Media, and LBC presenter).
In April 2021, the Court of Appeal quashed the convictions of 39 former Subpostmasters and ruled their prosecutions were an affront to the public conscience. They were just a few of the hunderds who had been prosecuted by the Post Office using IT evidence from an unreliable computer system called Horizon.
When the Post Office became aware that Horizon didn’t work properly, it covered it up.
The Great Post Office Scandal is the Story of how these innocent people had their lives ruined by a once-loved national institution and how, against overwelming odds, they fought back to clear their names. The fight to expose a multimillion Pound IT disaster which put innocent people in jail.
Gripping, heart-breaking and enlighening, The Great Post Office Scandal by Nick Wallis should be read by everyone who wants to understand how this massive miscarriage of justice was allowed to happen.
An extraordinary journalistic exposé of a huge miscarriage of justice.
Nick’s narrative has the power of a great thriller as he lays bare the lies and deceit that has ruined so many lives.
A tale brilliantly told by Nick Wallis, who has dedicated years of work to establishing what happened, why it happened, and calling those responsible to account. I urge you to read it.
In april 2021 heeft het Hof van Beroep de veroordelingen van 39 voormalige Subpostmasters vernietigd en geoordeeld dat hun vervolgingen een affront waren voor het publieke geweten. Ze waren slechts enkelen van de honderden die vervolgd waren door het Postkantoor op basis van IT-bewijs van een onbetrouwbaar computersysteem genaamd Horizon.
Toen het Postkantoor zich ervan bewust werd dat Horizon niet goed werkte, heeft het dit verdoezeld.
Het Grote Postkantoor Schandaal is het verhaal van hoe deze onschuldige mensen hun levens verwoest zagen door een eens geliefde nationale instelling en hoe ze, tegen overweldigende kansen in, terugvochten om hun namen te zuiveren. De strijd om een IT-fiasco van miljoenen ponden bloot te leggen dat onschuldige mensen in de gevangenis bracht.
Meeslepend, hartverscheurend en verhelderend; The Great Post Office Scandal by Nick Wallis zou gelezen moeten worden door iedereen die wil begrijpen hoe deze enorme gerechtelijke dwaling kon plaatsvinden.
Een buitengewoon journalistiek exposé van een groot gerechtelijk falen.
Nick’s verhaal heeft de kracht van een geweldige thriller terwijl hij de leugens en bedrog blootlegt die zoveel levens hebben verwoest.
Een briljant verteld verhaal door Nick Wallis, die jarenlang werk heeft toegewijd aan het vaststellen van wat er is gebeurd, waarom het is gebeurd, en het verantwoordelijk houden van degenen die ervoor verantwoordelijk zijn. Ik dring er bij je op aan om het te lezen.
M. Blinded and Derailed
The unimaginable large-scale event, ‘The Post Office Wrongful Conviction Scandal,’ is a prime example of what can happen in a society.
Out of nowhere, like a bolt from the blue, 730 people in the United Kingdom – each responsible for their respective post office – were convicted of theft, even though everyone knew they were innocent.
The flawed technology of the Horizon IT project was the culprit behind lost transactions, resulting in discrepancies in the postmaster’s accounting at the end of the day. In 1999, the UK implemented an IT project that computerized the post offices.
In clear language, one can say that it can happen to anyone that justice suddenly, without reason, cause, or basis, determines your life, despite there being nothing to be noted about you.
This is what happened suddenly to 19-year-old Liam Allan as a university student. A minute before twelve, he narrowly escaped a 10-year prison sentence and a lifetime branded as a dangerous sexual delinquent.
The website paints a picture of a kind of justice as an artificial context in which the innocent are consciously shattered by being imprisoned without the slightest fair judicial process, with no hope of ever being free again.
In klare taal kan men zeggen dat het iedereen kan overkomen dat justitie plotseling, zonder reden, aanleiding of oorzaak, je leven bepaalt, ondanks dat er niets op je is aan te merken.
Dit is wat de 19-jarige Liam Allan plotseling overkwam als universiteitsstudent. Een minuut voor twaalf ontsnapte hij ternauwernood aan een 10 jaar durende gevangenisstraf en een leven lang gebrandmerkt te worden als gevaarlijke seksuele delinquent.
De website schetst een beeld van een soort justitie als een kunstmatige context waarin onschuldigen bewust worden verbrijzeld door hen zonder het minste eerlijke verloop van justitie op te sluiten, zonder hoop om ooit nog vrij te komen.
It is revolting;
in all cases,
there is absolutely nothing,
no data whatsoever,
no matter how you look at it,
no connection or indication whatsoever.
It is clearly wrong,
and yet the blame is placed on you,
even though everyone knows how it all fits together
or what the cause is.
According to a specific pattern,
deceptive methods are used
to create a false impression.
The flawed technology of the Horizon IT project
in The Post Office Wrongful Conviction Scandal
is a prime example of
how justice can be wrongly employed
to crush the innocent.
The layers of complexity
There is nothing wrong,
but you find yourself in an artificial legal context.
Taken for a ride by the justice system
In the listed examples, a photo is used, but you are not the person in the photo.
(The case of Sheldon Thomas, who was sentenced to 19 years in prison at the age of 16).
You were not at the crime scene but at a sports event with more than 50,000 spectators
and your phone conversation is intercepted in the vicinity of the stadium.
Yet, you get into trouble until coincidental film footage emerges, taken at the actual location where you were.
(The case of Juan Catalan: Saved from Crooked Cops and a Lying Prosecutor).
Another example involves a so-called witness being pressured.
However, the perpetrator could not be identified because he was masked.
Therefore, claiming that the perpetrator was recognized is pointless.
(The case of Lamar Johnson, a 21-year-old who was locked up for 28 years).
This is what happened to John Bunn.
He was at home sleeping at 4 o’clock in the morning,
and, knowing he was innocent,
he was imprisoned for 17 years due to corrupt cop Louis Scarcella
(see the link to the first video: Top 7 Reactions Of INNOCENT Convicts Set Free).
Similar incidents happened to the other 6 people in the video.
On the other hand, a decision cannot be made based on something one does not know,
or creating an image of a person with an attitude and behavior that is not at all consistent with the person you are.
“Taken for a ride by the justice system”
conveys the idea that someone feels deceived or mistreated by the legal system.
It suggests a sense of being manipulated or experiencing unfair treatment
within the context of the justice system.
The Dutch expression
“Erin geluisd worden”
can be roughly translated to English as
“to be taken for a ride“
or “to be fooled“.
It implies being deceived or
tricked into something without being aware of it.
(iemand) slecht behandelen of misleiden waardoor hij of zij in de problemen komt informeel
Voorbeeld: ‘Wat een waardeloos product..
“Unsafe conviction” is a suitable expression to describe a conviction that is questionable or doubtful
due to issues such as errors in the legal process, insufficient evidence,
or other factors that may have led to an incorrect judgment.
It implies that the conviction may not be secure or reliable.
The term ‘unsafe conviction’ is often used in discussions about wrongful convictions
or cases where doubts arise about the fairness and accuracy of the legal outcome.
N. A cock-and-bull story
A fictitious cock seeking advice from a bull – A cock-and-bull story. Lord Justice Fraser makes a comparison, namely that despite the 29 bugs and errors being known since the beginning,
it was an absurdity to insist that Horizon was the Gold standard.
Just as one would claim in the 21st century that the Earth is flat.
Using such a paradox and blatant lie as a cover-up underscores how questionable things sometimes are within the justice system, accusing flawlessly innocent people without mercy of something they haven’t done. When it comes down to it, Paul Patterson, a Fujitsu boss, said: Shameful and Appailling
In the Britisch Post Office scandal it’s clear that in the context of the Horizon scandal, there were deliberate actions and decisions that unjustly harmed innocent people.
The deliberate scapegoating of individual postmasters and mistresses, knowing the issues lay within the Horizon system, can be seen as a purposeful disregard for the well-being of these individuals. The impact on their lives, including financial ruin, loss of employment, and in some cases imprisonment, is a grave injustice.
It is a stark example of the potential harm that can be caused when organizations prioritize protecting their reputation over the well-being of individuals and the integrity of the justice system.
9 Mr Bates vs The Post Office – The Real Story
Back to menu IMPORTANT CONTENT Listening recommended Must ***
het komt erop neer dat de 21e eeuw het equivalent is van volhouden dat de aarde plat is
Viewers watching the new ITV drama about the Post Office scandal will have noticed a well-dressed and bespectacled High Court judge presiding over affairs
The verdict of the real-life Lord Justice Fraser KC in Bates and Others versus Post Office Ltd saw 550 sub-postmasters win £58 million.
Lord Fraser ruled that the fault was with the computer system, and identified almost 30 glitches.
He sent a letter in January 2020 to Sir Max Hill KC, the former director of public prosecutions (DPP),
stating that the trial found evidence that Fujitsu knew about the existence of bugs, errors and defects in Horizon software…
When you read Nick Wallis’ book, ‘The Great Post Office Scandal,’ you find yourself rooted to the ground in certain passages; your mind comes to a standstill.
What people who have done nothing wrong have had to endure is indescribable in words.
If you haven’t read the book (562 pages), you don’t have a detailed overview of the entirety of what is so shocking about the whole situation.
Justice Fraser delivered a 330-page judgment outlining his findings on the Horizon.
On the day the judgment was handed down, our side was totally crammed with people. On the other side of the court, there were just two people. They knew what was going to happen; they knew which way this judgment was going to land, and it did. Mr. Fraser’s Horizon issues judgment.
This approach by the Post Office has amounted, in reality, to baseless assertions and denials that ignore what has actually occurred.
It amounts to the 21st-century equivalent of maintaining that the Earth is flat.
Wanneer je het boek leest van Nick Wallis, ‘The Great Post Office Scandal,’ ben je aan de grond genageld in bepaalde passages; je verstand staat stil. Wat mensen die niets misdaan hebben, hebben moeten meemaken, is met woorden niet uit te drukken.
Wanneer je het boek niet gelezen hebt (562 pagina’s) heb je geen overzicht in detail van het geheel van wat zo schokkend is aan het gehele gebeuren.
Rechter Fraser heeft een uitspraak van 330 pagina’s geleverd waarin hij zijn bevindingen over de Horizon uiteenzet.
Op de dag dat het vonnis werd uitgesproken, zat onze kant vol met mensen. Aan de andere kant van de rechtbank waren er slechts twee mensen. Ze wisten wat er zou gaan gebeuren; ze wisten welke kant dit vonnis op zou gaan, en dat gebeurde ook. De Horizon-zaak van de heer Fraser.
Deze benadering door het postkantoor heeft in werkelijkheid geleid tot ongefundeerde beweringen en ontkenningen die negeren wat er daadwerkelijk is gebeurd.
Het komt neer op het 21e-eeuwse equivalent van beweren dat de aarde plat is.
It amounts to the 21st-century equivalent of maintaining that the Earth is flat.
O. The aura of perfection
There is something profoundly unsettling about the way thousands of people can be prosecuted,
convicted, and possibly sentenced to endless prison terms, either due to flaws in the justice system
or the unfortunate choice of some to plead guilty to avoid wrongful imprisonment.
The question remains:
how can someone be deemed guilty
of something they didn’t do?
10 An inside look into the biggest miscarriage of justice in U.K history | 7 News Australia
Back to menu IMPORTANT CONTENT Listening recommended Must ***
13 feb 2024
The victims of the infamous UK post-office scandal have fresh hope and support, after a new docu-drama, airing on Channel 7 tomorrow, has thrown the scandal back into spotlight and public discourse. Patrick Spence, the show’s Executive Producer, joins us to discuss the response so far.
7NEWS combines the trusted and powerful news brands including Sunrise, The Morning Show, The Latest, and 7NEWS.com.au, delivering unique, engaging and continuous coverage on the issues that matter most to Australians. Watch 7 News Australia full broadcasts and full episodes nightly at 6pm and weekdays at 11:30am and 4pm on Channel 7 and 7plus.
11 Post Office scandal investigators accused of ‘Mafia-style’ bullying of subpostmasters
Back to menu IMPORTANT CONTENT Listening recommended Must ***
11 jan 2024
A former Post Office investigator has told the public inquiry into the Horizon scandal that he and his colleagues did not “behave like mafia gangsters”.
Stephen Bradshaw admitted he had been aware of problems with the IT software, but claimed he was “not technically minded” and was just “a liaison”.
Warning: This report contains some offensive language
At minute 2: Mafia tactics
At minute 2;50: Malevolence
At minute 5: There is no perfect way of doing that
At minute 6:30 Alan Bates went to court
At minute 7: Malevolence: the quality of causing or wanting to cause harm or evil
At minute: 8 More then Malevolence
Post Office scandal investigators accused of ‘Mafia-style’ bullying of subpostmasters
Webpagina: Post Office Scandal: Fetter Lane is where they used to hang people out to dry
MPs wipe floor with disgraceful Post Office in House of Commons
Justice can be used in a disgusting and reprehensible manner.
Someone can, due to a deceptive context, such as in numerous examples on the website, innocently end up in serious trouble in an unthinkable way, be convicted, and even end up in prison, as in the British Post Office scandal.
The Post Office Scandal is, at its core, inflicting harm on persons who have done nothing wrong.
People with a ‘Spotless Reputation’
Malevolence: the quality of causing or wanting to cause harm or evil (Cambridge Dictionary).
‘This approach by the Post Office has amounted, in reality, to baseless assertions and denials that ignore what has actually occurred.
The Horizon IT system never worked and it ended up causing massive holes in sub-postmasters’ account for which thet were blamed.
Justitie kan op een weerzinwekkende en verwerpelijke manier gebruikt worden.
Iemand kan door een bedrieglijke context, zoals in talrijke voorbeelden op de website, op ondenkbare manier onschuldig in ernstige moeilijkheden komen, veroordeeld worden en zelfs in de gevangenis belanden, zoals in het Britse Post Office-schandaal.
The Post Office Scandal is in de kern kwaad berokkenen aan personen die niets misdaan hebben.
Mensen met een ‘vlekkeloze reputatie.
Kwaadaardigheid: de eigenschap kwaad of kwaad te veroorzaken of te willen veroorzaken (Cambridge Dictionary).
Deze aanpak van het postkantoor komt in werkelijkheid neer op ongefundeerde beweringen en ontkenningen die voorbijgaan aan wat er werkelijk is gebeurd.
Het Horizon IT-systeem heeft nooit gewerkt en veroorzaakte uiteindelijk enorme gaten in de rekeningen van subpostmeesters, waarvoor zij de schuld kregen.
I think this drama will bring the story of what happened to hundreds of subpostmasters to a whole new audience, and they will be shocked and appalled by what they see.
The Post Office destroyed lives. Even now, with evidence being heard at the Public Inquiry, I sit and think ‘how on earth could someone do that to people and then go home and sleep at night’.
I think many people will have heard of the Post Office scandal and perhaps think only a few were affected.
What this drama shows is how it destroyed so many lives, and the battle we faced to take on the Post Office, and ultimately prove our innocence and win.
Transcrip: part of video ‘Post Office scandal investigators accused of ‘Mafia-style’ bullying of subpostmasters’
It has been going on for so long now, with so many different people failing the sub-postmasters—failed by the courts, which didn’t demand that the Post Office should provide proper disclosure of evidence; failed by the Post Office itself; obviously failed by Fujitsu; and failed by the politicians, including ourselves. If you watch the drama, you’ll see that I actually achieved nothing. It was only Alan Bates getting 555 people together to take it to court and to get funding for that, that achieved this incredible result.
So, Hartley Alan Bates’s lawyer, who spoke to Alex Thompson earlier today, says Fujitsu, for instance, should be paying millions of pounds right now into a fund that could be used later on. That would be one element of the justice that has not yet been achieved in all this. Do you agree with him? I agree with him, except that I think it should be hundreds of millions of pounds because Fujitsu was the company that was interfering in Subpostmasters’ accounts, not keeping a record of what it was doing, denying that it could do that, and doing all of that while it knew that people were being prosecuted and sent to prison for altered accounts. It is an awful, shocking story. Shocking also because this isn’t about corporate negligence; this is about malevolence—incentivized by bonuses, absolutely right.
What the Post Office did was it installed a program that it knew was faulty and then prosecuted the subpostmasters and demanded money from the sub-postmasters on the basis that the program was not faulty. In itself, it seems to me to be a simple matter of perversion of the course of justice, as well as probably theft, fraud, and various misuse act offenses all over the place. So yes, malevolence is the right word. Maybe it should be stronger than that. Well, given that, it might be stronger than that. Or do you say it should be stronger than that?
What does justice in all this look like? I mean, justice is the one thing that these poor people haven’t seen yet. Yes, justice means a number of things: overturning these convictions that should never have taken place, redress for those victims that had money taken away from them and their lives ruined, their marriages broken up, their houses repossessed, and bankrupted. Some of them took their own lives. It means holding to account the people who are responsible for this, which includes obviously the Post Office management, Post Office investigators, maybe the civil servants who were overseeing in theory what the Post Office was doing, maybe even the ministers, but also Fujitsu, which was doing these appalling things.
Are you talking about criminal charges then against those responsible? Certainly criminal charges. I can’t say against whom or for precisely what crimes. That’s a matter for the prosecuting authorities. But it would be awful if there weren’t some form of prosecution campaign beginning now. Lord Arbuthnot, thank you very much indeed.
The term “surreal” refers to something that is bizarre, dreamlike, or seemingly unreal in a way that challenges one’s sense of reality. It often describes situations or events that are so unusual or unexpected that they feel like a strange or distorted dream.
In the context of the British wrongful Post Office scandal, if someone describes it as surreal, they are likely expressing astonishment at the extraordinary and perhaps absurd nature of the events.
De term “surrealistisch” verwijst naar iets dat bizar, droomachtig of schijnbaar onwerkelijk is op een manier die iemands gevoel van realiteit uitdaagt. Het beschrijft vaak situaties of gebeurtenissen die zo ongebruikelijk of onverwacht zijn dat ze aanvoelen als een vreemde of vervormde droom.
In de context van het Britse schandaal met het onrechtmatig handelen van de posterijen, als iemand het als surrealistisch omschrijft, drukt diegene waarschijnlijk verbazing uit over de buitengewone en misschien absurde aard van de gebeurtenissen.
P. A mirror of madness
Postmasters accused of theft have convictions overturned | ITV News
24 apr 2021
Thirty-nine former sub-postmasters who were convicted of theft, fraud and false accounting due to the Post Office’s defective Horizon accounting system have had their names cleared by the Court of Appeal.
The Post Office prosecutions “irreparably ruined” the lives of scores of sub-postmasters causing them to lose their jobs, homes and marriages, the Court of Appeal heard last month.
He was formerly an MP, first for Wanstead and Woodford between 1987 and 1997, and then for North East Hampshire between 1997 and 2015.
While still an MP, Arbuthnot got involved in the campaign for exposure and justice surrounding the Post Office scandal, in which hundred were wrongly accused and convicted of theft, fraud and false accounting, due to a faulty computer system.
This was after it was brought to his attention by his constituent, Jo Hamilton, who was charged. He went on to lead the cross-party parliamentary group of MPs who came together after their constituencies asked them for help.
In 2015, Arbuthnot called for a judge-led investigation into the Post Office’s handling of the issue, saying: “These are people who have been pillars of the community and have their reputations dragged through the mud. The way they have been treated is an utter disgrace.”
In December 2019, a High Court judge ruled that Horizon contained a number of “bugs, errors and defects” and there was a “material risk” that this caused shortfalls in accounts.
The British Post Office has existed since 1660, which is 47 years before the establishment of the United Kingdom (in other words, it is more than 3 centuries old). It is considered the most trusted brand.
Since 2000, over a period of 14 years, like a devil in a holy water font, everything has been done to accuse innocent employees of this organization, highly regarded, of theft, and so on.
This occurred at a rate of more than 1 postmaster per week, knowing that the 736 employees directly prosecuted by The British Post Office have absolutely done nothing wrong. A form of unabashed modern-day slavery, with a devastating impact comparable to hell. The video in this section describes the reprehensible events.
One creates a context unrelated to justice. The word justice is used to create a deceptive context and to have free rein to act ruthlessly, to do what one cannot imagine.
The behavior resembles that of a psychopath who knows the tricks of ultimate deception and, in this way, without reason, cause, or origin, creates an image that does not correspond to reality.
One should read Nick Wallis’s book, “The Great Post Office Scandal – The Fight to Expose a Million Pound IT Disaster which Put Innocent People in Jail,” chapter by chapter, as it clearly illustrates the shocking way a law firm, having received over £35 million, in collaboration with others, has gone to great lengths to plunge people’s lives into the abyss on a large scale.
The British Post Office bestaat sinds 1660, wat 47 jaar vóór de oprichting van het Verenigd Koninkrijk is (met andere woorden, het is meer dan 3 eeuwen oud). Het wordt beschouwd als het meest vertrouwde merk.
Sinds 2000 is er gedurende een periode van 14 jaar, als een duivel in een wijwatervat, alles in het werk gesteld om onschuldige medewerkers van deze organisatie, die hoog in aanzien staat, te beschuldigen van diefstal enzovoort.
Dit gebeurde met een ritme van meer dan 1 postmeester per week, wetende dat de 736 medewerkers die direct door The British Post Office werden vervolgd, absoluut niets verkeerd hebben gedaan. Een vorm van onvervalste moderne slavernij, met een ontluisterende impact vergelijkbaar met de hel. De video in deze sectie beschrijft het weerzinwekkend gebeuren.
Men creëert een context die niets met justitie te maken heeft. Men gebruikt het woord justitie om een bedrieglijke context te creëren en vrij spel te krijgen om meedogenloos te handelen, om te doen wat men niet voor mogelijk houdt.
Het gedrag lijkt op dat van een psychopaat die de trukendoos kent van ultieme misleiding en op die manier, zonder reden, aanleiding of oorzaak, een beeld creëert dat niet overeenkomt met de werkelijkheid.
Men dient het boek van Nick Wallis, “The Great Post Office Scandal – The Fight to Expose a Million Pound IT Disaster which Put Innocent People in Jail,” – hoofdstuk na hoofdstuk te lezen, omdat het duidelijk maakt op welke schokkende manier een advocatenkantoor, dat meer dan 35 miljoen pond heeft ontvangen, in samenwerking met anderen, alles in het werk heeft gesteld om op grootschalige wijze het leven van mensen in de afgrond te storten.
We cannot minimize what is happening, the devastating impact on the lives of perfectly innocent people.
It is described in strong language.
- Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom calls The Post Office a very dangerous dog and monsterous injustice
- Lord Justice Fraser compares the baseless assertions and denials of the Post Office that ignore what has actually occurred. It amounts to the 21st-century equivalent of maintaining that the Earth is flat.
Lord Arbuthnot states that more than 900 individuals were unjustly convicted, actions that should never have occurred. They experienced financial losses, life ruin, marital breakdowns, home repossessions, and bankruptcy. Regrettably, some individuals took their own lives.
The scandal saw a faulty computer system, Horizon, lead to errors in financial reporting, leading to hundred of subpostmasters and mistresses being wrongly accused and convicted of theft, fraud and false accounting.
Lord Arbuthnot geeft aan dat meer dan 900 personen onterecht veroordeeld zijn, wat nooit had mogen gebeuren. Ze hebben financiële verliezen geleden, hun levens zijn verwoest, huwelijken zijn stukgelopen, huizen zijn in beslag genomen en sommigen zijn failliet gegaan. Helaas hebben enkelen van hen hun eigen leven genomen.
Tijdens het schandaal leidde een gebrekkig computersysteem, Horizon, tot fouten in de financiële rapportage, waardoor honderden onderpostmeesters en maîtresses ten onrechte werden beschuldigd en veroordeeld voor diefstal, fraude en valse boekhouding.
1 The Liam Allan case
- Liam Allan: a 19-year-old criminology student (January 2016) about whom there was no doubt – not the slightest doubt – is the template of the website (second item menu bar).
- It is beyond comprehension that Liam Allan was falsely accused!
- Liam Allan is the textbook example of how effortlessly one can turn something that doesn’t exist into a justice issue, just for the fun of fooling everyone – including Justice.
- In a state of foolishness, like ‘the blind leading the blind’, justice falls into the trap!
- The punchline of the website is getting entangled in the web of a false accusation, just like Liam Allan, who lived in fear for two years, all for nothing; this is emphasized in the following shocking video:
“She Should Get Life in Jail” – Man Falsely Accused.
It shows how far someone can go with disturbed behavior to disrupt justice. It’s not normal for someone to buy a hammer to inflict harm upon themselves in order to falsely accuse someone else in the most terrible way. - Making a mistake cannot go unnoticed, especially in a simple case. Thereby the proof of innocence was present from the start on the DVD with the full download of the phone. There was no case against Liam Allan, the false accusation was nonsense.
- Please compare with
Brian Banks Wrongfully Jailed For Rape As A Teen
An incomprehensible false accusation is a millstone around the neck for Brian Banks, who is ultimately exonerated after the confession regarding the false accusation and the work of an Innocent Project. - Cfr. Not everyone is honest – Not everyone is fair:
The making of
De casus Liam Allan
- Liam Allan: een 19 jarige criminologie student (januari 2016) waarover geen twijfel – niet de minste twijfel – mogelijk was! is de template van de website (tweede item menubalk).
- Het is niet te begrijpen, dat Liam Allan vals beschuldigd werd!
- Liam Allan is het schoolboekvoorbeeld van hoe men moeiteloos van iets die niet bestaat een justitie kwestie kan maken, om voor de sport iedereen – inclusief Justitie – voor de gek te houden.
- In een geest van verdwazing; als ‘the blind leading the blind’, trapt justitie in de valstrik!
- De clou van de website is, verstrikt geraken in het web van een valse beschuldiging, net als Liam Allan, die twee jaar lang in angst heeft geleefd, en dat allemaal voor niets, dit wordt benadrukt in de volgende schokkende video:
“She Should Get Life in Jail” – Man Falsely Accused.
Het toont hoever iemand gaan met gestoord gedrag om justitie te ontwrichten. Het is niet normaal dat iemand een hamer koopt om zichzelf toe te takelen, om vervolgens iemand anders op een zich niet voor te stellen manier valselijk te beschuldigen. - Het maken van een fout kan niet onopgemerkt blijven, in het bijzonder in een eenvoudige zaak. Daarbij het bewijs van onschuld was van bij de aanvang aanwezig op de dvd met de volledig download van de telefoon. Er was geen zaak tegen Liam Allan, de valse beschuldiging was onzin.
- Vergelijk met
Brian Banks Wrongfully Jailed For Rape As A Teen
Een niet te begrijpen valse beschuldiging is een blok aan het been van Brian Banks, die uiteindelijk geexonereerd wordt na de bekentenis nopens de valse beschuldiging en het werk van een Innocent Project. - Cfr. Niet iedereen is eerlijk – Niet iedereen is fair:
The making of
It’s not normal for someone to buy a hammer to inflict harm upon themselves in order to falsely accuse someone else in the most terrible way.
You can’t believe it…
it was 1 minute to 12,
Liam Allan was virtually unjustly sentenced to 10 years in prison
and lifelong registration as a sex offender.
Please click this link
An ordinary university student turned into a high-profile case:
The Times, the BBC, even a question in The House of Commons to Prime Minister Theresa May.
Prosecutor Jerry Hayes: “It’s just sheer incompetence.”
This is ‘The End of Normal’.
Justice and reality come face to face!
It cannot be explained or justified.
Unforgivable acts.
it’s too late to fill the well when the calf has drowned.
Mission Impossible
In the end, it became ‘the feel-good story of the year’
- What was impossible was made possible.
How the world came together to save 12 boys trapped in a Thai cave for 18 days – Age 11 to 16. (2018) The Thai Cave Rescue
Doctor Richard Harris says he had “zero confidence” the rescue plan would work.
The theme of the website
To feel the hair-raising impact on individuals who have suffered the shocking consequences of injustice, just like you are moved by what happened to those children in
2 A Devilish Construction
Transcript of video 1 at minute 1:53
“The night of the Pioneer hotel fire 16 year-old Louis Taylor was helping people escape.
You were considered a hero that night.
Yeah but they changed it all because of the colour of my skin.
You know I hate to say that, you know especially
it was a little coloured boy,
that Negro boy and they singled me out.
How does that happen in America and we were supposed to have the best justice system in the world.
Can someone explain that to me? Nobody explained that to me.”
What Louis Taylor tells goes through the heart.
The patterns of injustice imbedded in the justice system.
Unjustly convicted as a 16-year-old child
and imprisoned for 41 years without reason.
“Taylor says he intends to spend the rest of his days
just living and doing good things.”
Notice: Liam Allan escaped from a 10-year prison sentence
thanks to Prosecutor Jerry Hayes,
who stated, ‘It’s just sheer incompetence.’
In human language ‘it was botched justice’.
Using justice to create a false image.
The gateway to a deceitful society.
Arizona’s Pioneer Hotel fire in 1970 and the 16 year old Louis Taylor
10 Innocent Man Convicted for 42 Years In Prison – Louis Taylor Victim of the System
11 Arizona’s Pioneer Hotel fire re-examined
The way in which 16-year-old Louis Taylor ends up
in prison for 41 years…
Putting the blame on someone who has done nothing wrong.
When you closely examine the many times that justice does very wrong things, your perception of justice shifts.
You sense very well that you are dealing with contradictions and that what is happening within the judiciary, doesn’t align.
Wanneer je de vele keren dat justitie heel erg foute dingen doet beter bekijkt dan kantelt je beeld van justitie.
Je voelt heel goed aan dat je met tegenstrijdigheden te maken hebt en dat wat er gebeurt bij justitie, dat dit niet klopt.
Justice is a paradox
(Liam Allan 19, Louis Taylor 16, Ricky Jakson 18, Brian Banks 16, Ryan Ferguson 17, The Central Park Five 14, 15 and 16, The Scottsboro Boys 13 to 17, George Stinney 14, Kevin Strickland 18, John Bunn 14)
The reality surpasses fiction
De realiteit overtreft de fictie
Throughout the website, we need a much more grown-up approach
to the pain carried by all these human beings when we learn their stories.
Truth be told
They knew about its flaws but continued a campaign
of hounding Post Office Masters and Mistresses.
Please click the link:
3 It was abhorrant and it shouldn’t have happened that these people were innocent behind bars:
Innocent behind bars is
Horrible
Inconceivable
Inconprehensible
Unthinkable
Those innocent people have been through a
living hell
being in prison for something they did not do.
In other words:
it is a legal system that is decidedly wrong.
This is no longer justice
Other forces are at play
This is nonsense
Something is wrong
This list of 9 examples is not an exception.
The National Registry of Exonerations,
which tracks known exonerations in the United States, lists
3,488 individuals who have been exonerated since 1989.
- We see that the number of acquittals is on the rise.
- The way people were convicted is disturbing. It is beyond rational comprehension. It is a pressing question:
- how can you convict people, considering that they were not present?
- It shows that justice is not making the right decisions.
- An unfavourable view on justice. Looking with other eyes.
- “They covered up the truth and the facts”
The number of cases that go wrong is not exceptional.
5% of 2 million people in prison in the USA is 100,000 individuals who experience the nightmare of their lives on a daily basis, for many for the rest of their lives. (KU Leuven May 2023)
Het aantal zaken die foutlopen zijn geen uitzonderingen.
5 % op 2 miljoen in de gevangenis in de USA is 100 000 mensen die dagelijks de nachtmerrie van hun leven beleven, voor velen voor de rest van hun leven. (KU Leuven May 2023)
It is a story one in a million.
It is unbelievable how justice puts Valentino in jail for 27 years!
You can feel the pain John Bunn has had to endure all these years.
The justice paradox on the shoulders of such a young boy of only 14.
27 years long, day after day, unbearable pain.
Possibly, this dozen of cases makes you think twice,
and you come to realize
what children and people experience to control
something they are not to blame for and does not apply to them,
in similar situations.
The way in which people who have done nothing wrong
end up in prison is revolting
e.g. fabricated evidence.
It is mind-boggling what justice does
to put together what is not applicable…
The data from so many cases are evidence of such practices
e.g. Investigative misconduct – NYPD Detective Louis Scarcella
A never-ending long list of cases is living proof of the disruption of justice.
The case of Andrew Makinson who spent 17 years wrongfully imprisoned.
Justice is not served,
according to the most important metric, reality.
This hits the core of the website
The fine line between justice and injustice
Please click on the link
The template is a part that exists within the justice system
– a type of justice – a justice gap –
where one can do what a person of conscience cannot do…
Het patroon is een onderdeel die bestaat binnen justitie
– een soort justitie – een justitie leemte –
waar men kan doen wat een mens met een geweten niet kan doen …
The law has been carried out wrongly.
There was obstruction to the course of justice.
(= preventing the law being put into action).
In the early nineties American criminal defence attorneys created a network of international associations
called the Innocence Network. It’s been 30 years their mission to fight injustice by exonerating innocent people
and helping the justice system correct its mistakes. It a worldwide human rights movement.
Anybody can be mistakenly identified and how many times do we have to see this.
There are so many more innocent people in prison than people realize – Barry Scheck
Behind every example lies a gruesome truth.
A weak system that has failed is not a marginal thing.
People will realize that people are wrongly convicted.
4 A peculiar paradox
- When someone is wrongfully convicted, even though it is known that the person has nothing to do with it, and then in prison, they are unable to escape from this dire situation, it is a reality that should never be allowed to happen.
- It is an event that shatters a person’s life.
- It is a hopeless, indescribable pain for someone who is unfamiliar with and experiencing this burden.
- One cannot deny that the justice system sometimes makes a mess of things and that this happens very consciously. Click one or several of the above links and listen to some videos of those who were framed and ended up in prison.
- If you do something like that, consciously ruining the lives of people who have done nothing wrong, how much respect do you have for society?
4 Een eigenaardige paradox
- Wanneer iemand onterecht veroordeeld wordt hoewel men weet dat de persoon er niets mee te maken heeft, en dan in de gevangenis het onmogelijk doet om uit deze benarde situatie onderuit te geraken, het is de werkelijkheid die nooit mag kunnen gebeuren.
- Het is een gebeurtenis die het leven van een mens kapot maakt.
- Het is een uitzichtloze niet te beschrijven pijn voor iemand die de last niet kent en draagt.
- Men kan niet ontkennen dat justitie er soms een puinhoop van maakt en dat dit heel bewust gebeurt. Klik één of enkele van bovenstaande links en beluister enkele video’s van mensen die geframed in de gevangenis terecht kwamen.
- Als je bewust mensen die niets verkeerds hebben gedaan, hun leven kapotmaakt, hoeveel respect heb je dan voor de samenleving?
Of course, it is deliberate and intentional that a case is mishandled.
Rowing harder doesn’t help if the boat
is headed in the wrong direction.
KENICHI OHMAE
The justice system throws the door wide open to fraud.
It contradicts due process. A fair trial.
A legal process can easily derail, resulting in not getting what one deserves,
with the horrific outcome as seen in the examples on this webpage and on the website.
As a human being, you cannot be insensitive to this kind of abuse of power.
Do you realize how much suffering one inflicts upon a person in such a situation of extreme injustice?
You need to feel the pain that those young people have had to endure
in order to realize the impact on their lives.
The statement is highlighting two perspectives on fairness and justice.
“Fairness is what justice really is”: This suggests that true justice is synonymous with fairness. In an ideal situation, when justice is served, it is fair to all parties involved. It implies that the outcome of a just process should be equitable and unbiased.
“Fairness by the time justice is done”: This part is pointing out a potential issue. It suggests that in reality, the time it takes to achieve justice might be so long that the concept of fairness gets compromised. Delays in the legal system or other factors may mean that by the time justice is finally delivered, the damage caused by injustice may already be irreversible.
In summary, the statement is emphasizing the importance of not only achieving justice but also doing so in a timely manner. Delayed justice might result in permanent harm, and true justice should inherently be fair.
“The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law – Aristotle”
Aristotle is expressing the idea that a society is most stable when all people are treated equally under the law. In simpler terms, it means that for a community or a country to be balanced and secure, everyone should be subject to the same rules and laws, without any special privileges or discrimination. This principle suggests that fairness and equality in legal treatment contribute to a stable and harmonious society.
[
Aristotle
Plato
Socrates
Immanuel Kant
Michael Sandel
Virtue Ethics
Philosophy
Wise Quotes
Professor dr. Dirk De Wachter
Professor dr. Jonathan Holslag
Gandhi
Dr. Martin Luther King jr.
Malcolm X
Yuval Noah Harari
Dr. Jane Goodall
Boudewijn – To the Heart of the King
Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands
Nikola Tesla
Thomas Alva Edison
Let’s break down these two sentences:
“Justice dies when truth is buried under the infinite layers of lies…” – Akanksha Dudpuri:
This sentence suggests that when the truth is concealed beneath numerous layers of lies, justice becomes ineffective or even nonexistent. The metaphorical idea here is that lies can create a barrier, making it difficult for the truth to surface and, as a result, justice cannot prevail.
“Multi-layered means here destructive justice versus Justice is truth in action.
In this sentence, the term “multi-layered” used in the first sentence. “Multi-layered” refers to a situation where justice becomes destructive, presumably due to the layers of lies obstructing the truth. Then, the contrast with your the perspective that true justice is when the legal system operates based on the truth – “Justice is truth in action.” This implies that real justice is achieved when the truth is actively pursued and acknowledged in legal proceedings.
In summary, both sentences convey the idea that justice relies on the truth and that when lies obscure the truth, justice is compromised, potentially leading to destructive outcomes. The second sentence clarifies the meaning of “multi-layered” by contrasting it with the concept of justice as the embodiment of truth.
5 Justice being fooled as in a candid camera
12 Most Disgusting Wine Tasting Prank
17 jul. 2012.
When there are hiccups due to deception – being fooled like in a candid camera – this is the lever, the means to disrupt a justice system and cause a crazy verdict that shatters a person’s life from one moment to the next, without reason, cause, or motive.
Wanneer er haperingen ontstaan door misleiding – gefopt worden zoals in een candid camera – dit is de hefboom, het middel om een justitie systeem te ontwrichten en een gek vonnis te veroorzaken die het leven van een mens van het ene moment op het andere verbrijzelt, zonder reden, aanleiding of oorzaak.
It looks like Candid Camera, justice has fallen into an inconvenient trap
Barry Gibbs does not understand the conviction or how he came to be involved in the case at all.
It’s the same for Anthony Ray Hinton, they knew he was innocent
Exonerated death row inmate tells his story at Legacy Museum
“Out of all the Innocence Project cases, I think that Barry Gibbs is the one instance
where a police officer just literally picked out somebody
and said, ‘We have to frame him.’
It’s one of the things that you have to understand about Barry,
as opposed to so many other people.
It’s completely crazy and irrational you could be framed for this murder
out of nowhere. It’s terrible, terrible.”
Barry Scheck at minute 22 of the video
When you end up in the wrong hands
with the justice system, your life is over.
Something seemingly fairly straightforward but going very wrong,
turns out to have a very strange cause.
The history is replete with people who are benevolent towards some and cruel towards others.
One can easily create a false image and use it
to deliberately destroy the lives of ordinary people and children.
The mind-boggling examples on this webpage is proof of that.
It is a shameful justice system.
A joke like candid camera.
Iets dat op het eerste gezicht vrij eenvoudig lijkt te zijn
maar weerzinwekkend verkeerd loopt bij justitie,
blijkt een vreemde oorzaak te hebben.
De geschiedenis loopt over met mensen die goedwils zijn richting sommigen
en wreed richting anderen.
Men kan makkelijk een verkeerd beeld creëren en dit gebruiken
om het leven van doodgewone mensen en kinderen bewust kapot te maken.
De extreme voorbeelden in deze webpagina zijn daarvan het bewijs.
Het is een schandelijk rechtssysteem.
Een grap zoals candid camera.
A justice system visibly painfully used as a game,
without any conscience
(as clarified on following pages, button Part 2 to Part 7).
‘Justice is a jungle’.
No shame whatsoever, no sense of guilt, no humanity, no morals and no principes.
Abject unscrupulous as a dictator.
There are plenty more mind-boggling examples throughout the website.
It is like the metaphorical Magdeburg hemispheres.
You either acknowledge the reality of life or you persevere in wickedness.
That moment that everything fits together and makes sense.
Conscience must respect truth.
The conscience will make false judgments when it fails to acknowledge the truth about things.
The question is
how is it possible for someone with malicious intent to do something like this,
causing an innocent child to end up in prison for endless years?
It’s a defining moment
The moment they realise something ‘unthinkable’ was going on.
When you listen attentively to the videos and when it sinks in what justice inflicts on people, you come to the surprising and bizarre realization that one cannot imagine that such a thing is possible.
Justice doesn’t have a proper case, and they proceed in an artificial manner to convict someone.
The same thing that happens to Liam Allan repeats itself every time.
Justice simply doesn’t do what it’s supposed to, as explained and as you can observe in the link below:
Wanneer je met aandacht luistert naar de video’s en wanneer het tot je doordringt wat justitie aanricht aan mensen kom je tot de verrassende en bizarre vaststelling dat men het zich niet kan voorstellen dat zoiets mogelijk is.
Justitie heeft helemaal geen dossier en dan gaat men op een kunstmatige manier te werk om iemand te veroordelen.
Hetzelfde wat Liam Allan overkomt, herhaalt zich iedere keer.
Justitie doet doodgewoon niet wat ze hoort te doen, zoals uitgelegd en zoals je kunt vaststellen op onderstaande link:
6 A Battle-Hardened Society
13 The Secret Princess: King’s love child in court battle for recognition | 60 Minutes Australia
11 okt. 2020
Battle-Hardend
Toughened by the experience of battle
Collins English Dictionary.
Hard-fought
Achieved after a lot of difficulty or fighting
A hard-fought victory
Cambridge Dictionary
King Albert II was able to string along the justice system with his lawyers for 7 long years until he was eventually punished by the justice system with a fine of 5000 euros per day for refusing to provide his DNA. It immediately became clear that he is the father of Delphine, something that he himself and all of Belgium eventually knew. Please enjoy the video: The Secret Princess: King’s love child in court battle for recognition.
Pushed to my last resort
I took my father to court
It was all over the news
The family was not amused
…
Justice is a nonsense word
That does not exist in this world
Delphine Boël
Born on 22 February 1968
Be your last resort
idiom
To be the only person or thing that might be able to help you, when every other person or possibility has failed:
You have to help me – you’re my last resort.
Cambridge Dictionary
Trials are about Truth,
it is not a Contest
What Albert II has done to Delphine is not the royal way.
People say he has caused her a lot of pain.
The mud on someone else’s carpet is not the soap on your own carpet.
That King Albert II did not arrive at an easy solution behind closed doors
and defended himself by ‘Hiding in Plain Sight‘ is
an example of a vexatious and reckless lawsuit.
Dat koning Albert II niet binnenkamers tot een makkelijke oplossing is gekomen
en zich ‘Hiding in Plain Sight‘ verweerde is
een voorbeeld van een tergend en roekeloos geding.
Princess Delphine had to wage a battle
against her father to be acknowledged.
After a seven-year struggle a court ruled Delphine and her children had won the right to Royal tiltes.
Delphine has been officially anointed as a Princess of Belgium.
Princess Delphine adds at minute 14 in the video 6 above:
“Albert’s side and his lawyers were horrible.”
It is an emotional victory.
For the former king a humiliating defeat.
A battle fought not for money or for fame,
but on the principle that a father should always look out for his kids.
Dephine says: “I am pround of myself because it was difficult and I had to fight for something that really belongs to me and belongs to my children and I hope that by what I’ve done, it can help other people not to give up and that’s very special for me. I feel very proud because I know how important it is. It really is important to know you know where you come from.”
‘There, he completely ruined it for himself.’
This is the expression as it appeared in the newspaper about Albert II.
“Daar heeft hij het voor zichzelf helemaal kapot gemaakt”
This is the original Dutch text.
7 Despite knowing the facts, wrong decisions were made or the event was not stopped
You can only call it an accident if it is an accident.
The tragic outcome in the case of Sanda Dia is not an accident,
as wrongly stated in the verdict.
He couldn’t even walk in the morning – as we can see in the footage –
due to the forced consumption of alcohol the previous day,
by the members of Reuzegom. And so on,
such as the torture practices that followed throughout the night and the entire day.
It was a broken system, as explained in detail in the website.
People were completely blinded and derailed like the conman Diederik Stapel in Part 2 of the website.
Conmen Jimmy Savile,
Bernie Madoff and
BBC journalist Marten Bashir
knew how to use deceitful tactics.
It is not a pretty picture what happened to princes Diana by the BBC journalist Marten Bashir
in a deceitful way to have the interview in 1995 by using false bank statements.
What Sanda Dia had to endure for days is downright criminal, being tortured to death.
The verdict is a slap in the face. It is a game of words. It is a missed opportunity.
His death is not an accident
In such situations, the system loses all credibility and you get worthless conclusions.
Choosing
towards the injustices happening in your own backyard
because they’re not happening to you
is the same as being an accomplice to it.
We fail as a society
when we can give more excuses towards our failings,
and less examples of our accomplishments.
The points ‘A Battle-Hardened Society’
and the examples in ‘Despite knowing the facts’
illustrate that other forces are at play.
8 Other forces are at play
14 DSK Released From House Arrest
Dominique Strauss-Kahn has been released from house arrest, amid doubts over the credibility of the woman who accused him of rape.
The saying goes:
“The guilty rich go free, and
the innocent poor are convicted.”
It is like ‘To see the speck in another’s eye, but not the beam in one’s own’. A biblical passage found in the Bible, specifically Matthew 7:3-5 (King James Version).
To see the speck in another’s eye, but not the beam in one’s own
Please click the link above
15 Inside DSK’s Indictment
16 Who is Dominique Strauss-Kahn? | Guardian Explainers
Back to menu IMPORTENT CONTENT Listening recommended Must
16 feb. 2015
Isn’t the case of DSK and the chambermaid at the Sofitel hotel in New York
the living proof that justice can be used as a deus ex machina?
In other words, justice can serve as an unexpected or dramatic solution,
much like the literary device “deus ex machina”.
The Scandal that Brought Down DSK
Please visite this web page about this subject
When you go through the examples on this home page and examples throughout the website, and
carefully listen to videos in which those who were wrongly convicted speak, and
when you sense the impossible ordeal these young people and individuals had to endure,
it’s like ‘rowing with the oars you have‘ in
impossible circumstances of abuse of power,
‘it’s throwing someone to the wolves’.
Even a young child in all its innocence.
The worst form of injustice.
It’s enough to make you fall off your chair
when so many pillars in society are aware
of something that can be easily resolved,
and yet it still goes wrong.
Other forces are at play.
17 MY FATHER LEFT❗WHEN I WAS 2 YEARS OLD❗❗- BARACK OBAMA ( MOTIVATIONAL SPEECH)
speaker :
Danzel Washington
Steve Harvey
Les Brown
Jim Rohn
Matthew McConaughey
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Barack Obama
footage :
all video footage used from various stock footage websites
18 Barack Obama’s Inspirational Speech with Subtitles || One of the best English speeches ever 2023
Back to menu IMPORTANT CONTENT Listening recommended Must
Barack Obama’s Inspirational Speech with Subtitles || One of the best English speeches ever 2023
Barack Hussein Obama II is an American retired politician who served as the 44th president of the United States from 2009 to 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, Obama was the first African-American president of the United States.
19 One of The Greatest Speeches Ever by President Obama | Best Eye Opening Speech
26 aug 2022
Barack Obama the 44th president of the United States. Listen to the end of this video where President Obama shares his most valuable piece of advice for How To Succeed In Life by overcoming all barriers. His GREATEST Life Advice will Eventually Change Your view about Life.
Composer: Whitesand (Martynas Lau)
Year: 2020
Title: The Dark Knight
20 J.K. Rowling’s Ultimate Advice For Every 20 Year Old | One of the Best Motivational Speeches Ever
J.K. Rowling, Author of the Best-selling Book Series In History, Harry Potter, Shares Her Ultimate Advice For Every 20-Year Old. ►Get the Harry Potter Series (book or audio): https://amzn.to/3CqSzt7
Please enjoy more about Barack Obama: some 15 web pages J.K. Rowling Speaks at Harvard Commencement
A Congolese man, Nsala Wala, witnessed the mutilation and alleged cannibalization of his five-year-old daughter, Boali, by members of the militia of the Abir Congo Rubber Company in 1904. The passage recounts that because Nsala did not meet his rubber harvesting quotas for the day, overseers appointed by the company amputated Boali’s hands and feet. Additionally, they killed his wife and, in a gruesome act, cannibalized both Boali and her mother.
The writer reflects that this image represents the most powerful depiction of human evil in its most reprehensible form.
They emphasize that the events in Belgian Congo during the early 20th century were an unspeakable horror.
This must not be forgotten.
“Een Congolese man kijkt naar de afgehakte hand en voet van zijn vijfjarige dochter, die naar verluidt werd gekannibaliseerd door leden van de militie van de Abir Congo Rubber Company in 1904. De naam van de man is Nsala Wala. Het verhaal gaat dat hij zijn latexoogstquota voor de dag niet haalde, dus de door het bedrijf aangestelde voormannen hakten de handen en voeten van zijn dochter Boali af. Maar dat was niet alles, ze doodden ook zijn vrouw. En alsof dat nog niet wreed genoeg was, kannibaliseerden ze Boali en haar moeder.”
Het is het krachtigste beeld dat ik me herinner te hebben gezien, omdat het menselijk kwaad in zijn meest verwerpelijke vorm toont.
Wat er in de Belgische Congo is gebeurd, is een onuitsprekelijke horror en het gebeurde aan het begin van de 20e eeuw!
Dit mag niet worden vergeten.
The website is about something beyond anyone’s imagination.
De website gaat over iets die ieders voorstellingsvermogen te boven
gaat.
It’s about collective madness; people are willing to construct and participate in it.
Anything goes; there’s a lack of any sense of reality. Standing there without conscience, facing the glow of a child’s life, a consciously thinking, highly educated individual with intrinsic responsibilities decides to deprive this child of the essence of life.
While one person with the slightest gesture could prevent and/or stop this immediately.
When you operate like this are you still a human being? Is this still a society?
They are existential questions one can ask oneself when it dawns on you what is happening in the examples on the homepage and throughout the website.
It’s something of which it’s sometimes said in a forgiving tone, best that we don’t all know about it.
It’s a kind of culture one finds themselves in, that is inherent to this type of event; it’s the environmental conditions and the vicious cycle, despite the red flags, that make the not imaginary perverse occurrence possible.
If you don’t have all the data in such a situation, one can easily portray a completely different image. This is the trick box through which one can sprinkle sand in the eyes without shame and lead to a deceptive happening. Sorry for the word.
Het gaat over de collectieve verdwazing waarbij men bereid is een constructie in elkaar te steken en er aan mee te werken.
Alles is toegelaten, elk werkelijkheidsbesef ontbreekt, zonder geweten sta je tegenover de glans van het leven van een kind en je beslist bewust als weldenkend hoog opgeleid mens met intrinsieke verantwoordelijkheden dit kind de essentie van het leven te ontnemen.
Terwijl één iemand met het minste gebaar dit onmiddellijk kan voorkomen en/of doen ophouden.
Wanneer je zo tewerk gaat ben je dan nog mens? Is dit nog een samenleving?
Het zijn levensvragen die men zich kan stellen wanneer het tot je doordringt wat er zich voordoet bij de voorbeelden op de home pagina en doorheen de website.
Het is zoiets waarvan soms vergoelijkend wordt gezegd, best dat we het niet allemaal weten.
Het is een soort cultuur waarin men terecht komt, die aan dit soort gebeuren eigen is, het zijn de omgevingsomstandigheden en de viceuze cirkel ondanks, de red flags die het niet denkbeeldig pervers gebeuren mogelijk maakt.
Als je in zo’n situatie niet alle gegevens kent, kan men makkelijk een totaal ander beeld voorspiegelen. Dit is de truckendoos waardoor men zonder schaamte kan zand in de ogen strooien en kom je tot een bedriegelijke gebeuren. Sorry voor het woord.
The John Bunn Story, wrongfully jailed at 14
Please watch video 1 “At 14, he was convicted of a murder he didn’t commit“ on this link
John Bunn very appropriately names it “a crime I had no knowledge of, I had nothin’ to do with”.
9 It is a very bad thing for justice
Justice enters unknown territory, one does not know the reality, bias can arise, framing can occur, elements can be ignored, and a deceptive image can be created.
A dossier is not reality; it’s a rational representation, it’s fragmentary, it doesn’t fully penetrate, it’s at a distance, you can put it in perspective, and it becomes a means to not engage with how wrong the actual events are. Someone else can view something in a different way, and so on.
Initially, the justice system can make a mistake in a particular case, but later you see clues and realize that something is not right, and the person facing difficulties due to the legal process has nothing to do with it, and no blame can be pinned on them.
Sometimes it’s something very simple and straightforward and can be easily resolved.
Like with a bag someone forgets next to a bench at a railway station; it’s immediately taken to lost and found by someone arriving. A few moments later, Securail comes to check because they received a call from the person who later realized they forgot a bag. Meanwhile, it’s announced on the platform by the person who found the bag to Securail, that the bag is already at the lost and found, and everything is immediately resolved.
Of course, it’s different when dealing with a rigid system or a difficult person who is entangled in strange twists or is not suitable or competent to handle something.
The risk inherent in justice is that it can be used in a wrong way:
Justice is crumbling into an artificial happening, used for appearances.
The consequences for the person caught up in something like this are dramatic.
It is a kind of justice that is noticeably pieced together with malicious intent, and this is very evident in everything.
When nonsense is used, for example, there is no file, and that’s why one resorts to something deceptively put together.
This is clearly reflected in an abundance of examples on the homepage and throughout the website. The line has been crossed, it’s criminal behavior.
The purpose of the website is to make this risk clear.
It is alarming that justice can derail in this way and it is astonishing that this happens so ruthlessly internally.
Justice is being framed, from within by
untrustworthy entities
Justitie wordt erin geluisd, van binnenin door
onbetrouwbare entiteiten
21 – Top 7 Reactions Of INNOCENT Convicts Set Free
22 Man wrongly jailed for murder as teen in 1991 is exonerated
Summary of 7 innocent convicts set free
1 John Bunn:
2 David Ranta:
3 Susan Mellen:
4 Luis Vargas:
5 Daniel Villegas:
6 Ricky Jackson:
7 Kistin Lobato:
served 16 years + 11 year out on parole, was only 14 years old. Corupt cop Louis Scarcella. No possible cause to arrest
spend 22 years on fabricated evidence, Corupt cop Louis Scarcella, he was 35
served 17 years was 42 years old, conviction solely on informant who was a pathological lier and unreliable witness!
spend 16 years, he was 29, free on DNA
served 18 years when he was 16 years, signed a confession under force, tried to retract it 2 hours later but it was to late
served over 39 years when he was 18 years, witness came forward, he never saw the murder, he was 12 year, overturned in 2014
served 16 year when she was 18 years, was 3 hours away and couldn’t have committed the murder
It’s just unimaginable
that someone is innocently in prison
in such a way and then for such a terribly long period.
A failing justice system has far-reaching,
incomprehensible, and uncertain consequences.
Wouldn’t you be shocked about the functioning of justice?
23 Court Cam: Crowd Cheers for Wrongfully Convicted Man Found NOT Guilty (Season 1) | A&E
Back to menu IMPORTENT CONTENT Listening recommended Must
18 mrt 2020
After spending the majority of his life behind bars for a wrongful conviction, Daniel Villegas is found not guilty and the courtroom goes wild in this clip from Season 1, Episode 2 “Court Cam (#102)”. #CourtCam
Subscribe for more from Court Cam and other great A&E shows: http://aetv.us/subscribe-ae
From frightening outbursts to furious judges, “Court Cam” gives viewers an in-depth examination of some of the most stunning and emotional courtroom moments caught on camera. Hosted by Dan Abrams, each episode includes interviews with judges, witnesses, and victims who give a first-hand account of what really happened during these intense courtroom moments. This comprehensive look at how the action unfolds allows viewers to sit in the courtroom as they witness crazy courtroom moments from the most high-profile trials to minor court proceedings.
A&E leads the cultural conversation through high-quality, thought provoking original programming with a unique point of view. Whether it’s the network’s distinctive brand of award-winning disruptive reality or groundbreaking documentary, A&E makes entertainment an art form. Visit us at aetv.com for more info.
For the first time since he was 16 years old
25 years ago, Daniel Villegas is a free man.
if you watch this 9-minute video – a compilation of 7 examples of wrongly convicted individuals.
Take the case of Ricky Jakson, an 18-year-old boy who has been behind bars for over 39 years based on a coerced statement from a 12-year-old!
This is just one example of the many thousands who are released from prison after being exonerated. Free from all guilt after years of imprisonment, during which it was known that the person was innocent!
Currently 3,400 person are exonerated since 1989 in the USA alone. The link above to The National Registry of Exonerations in point 3 on this webpage.
Ex‧on‧e‧rate: to state officially that someone who has been blamed for something is not guilty
Exonerate somebody from/of something. He was totally exonerated of any blame. Longman Dictionary
In 2018, heaven and earth were moved to rescue 12 teenagers of the same age (11 to 16 years old) and their 25-year-old coach in an almost impossible manner during the monsoon from a cave in Thailand (as mentioned higher in point 1 for comparison).
In the realm of justice, they do exactly the opposite.
It is apparently child’s play to disrupt the system and shatter the lives of children and people, as one can observe based on thousands of examples.
Point ‘9 It is a very bad thing for justice’. The text under this title above explains, what is going on.
Below, 5 lines, both in English and Dutch, questioning the attention wrongly convicted individuals deserve when the justice system fails.
What happens to those children at such a young age is so extreme – as a human, you must have experienced something very terrible yourself – to feel the pain that they endure in the 7 examples, something that could never have happened to them at all.
Can you be indifferent as a human when you cause so much pain to another person and put them in such a humiliating situation by associating them with something they have nothing to do with, especially when this is consciously done by entities within the justice system?
The intention is to have a clear view of what is happening in the justice system.
In particular, as mentioned in the subtitle on each webpage,
you will notice that the justice system is failing.
In other words, the erroneous judgment of justice is not based on reality
– which is the ultimate goal – but it is the factor of ‘distorted perception‘
(that has arisen or has been deliberately created)
that was decisive in the decision of justice.
A case that didn’t need to be pursued.
As stated after exoneration, yet the justice system fails,
and the individual in question spends endless years in prison,
in the most horrible conditions. How can one explain this?
Kun je als mens onverschillig zijn als je een mens zoveel pijn berokkent en in zo’n onterende situatie brengt door hem in verband te brengen met iets waar hij niets mee te maken heeft, in het bijzonder wanneer dit bewust gebeurt door entiteiten binnen justitie?
Het is de bedoeling een klare kijk te hebben op wat er gebeurt bij justitie.
In het bijzonder, zoals vermeldt in de subtitel op elke webpagina,
dat je merkt dat het justitie systeem faalt.
M.a.w. het foute oordeel van justitie is niet gebaseerd op de werkelijkheid
– wat uiteraard de bedoeling is – doch het is de factor ‘de vertekende beeldvorming‘
(die ontstaan is of die bewust gecreëerd werd)
die was doorslaggevend bij de beslissing van justitie.
Een zaak die niet hoefde vervolgt te worden.
Zoals na exoneration wordt verklaard,
maar het justitie systeem faalt en de betreffende persoon zit eindeloos veel jaren in de gevangenis,
in de meest horrible omstandigheden. Hoe kun je zoals verklaren?
24 Football Star Exonerated After 10-Year Wrongful Conviction | NowThis
Football star Brian Banks spent 5 years in prison and another 5 years on probation after being falsely accused of rape — but he doesn’t want his story to diminish survivors’ stories.
In US news and current events today, Brian Banks sat down with NowThis News to talk about being one of many exonerated prisoners found to be innocence by the Innocence Project and other organizations like it. The Brian Banks story as explained by Banks is that he was at the top of high school football and had a promising career, but was derailed after being falsely accused of rape and then caught in a wrongful conviction. Documentary shorts like this highlight the innocence project cases that could help change the criminal justice system. A new film about Brian Banks highlights his story.
The Brian Banks story as explained by Banks is that he was at the top of high school football
and had a promising career, but was derailed after being falsely accused of rape
and then caught in a wrongful conviction.
I was also questioning, why? Why did this have to happen?
Why did it take so long for people to finally begin to listen?
What happens to 16-year-old Brian Banks is beyond imagination.
There is nothing wrong, this was very clear.
Nevertheless, the teenager spends 6 years in prison and
is then released with an ankle monitor.
It is shocking that something like this is possible.
Furthermore, the university is condemned,
and the person who made the false accusation receives a substantial compensation.
How is it possible for the justice system to spiral into such negativity?
Ultimately, by chance, being vigilant, and with some luck,
the truth comes to the surface, and Brian Banks is exonerated.
It is a compelling example.
It is essential to pay attention to the horrific failure of the justice system.
What de 16 jarige Brian Banks overkomt, kan men zich niet voorstellen.
Er is niets aan de hand, dit was erg duidelijk.
Desondanks zit de tiener 6 jaar in de gevangenis en dan vrij met een enkelband.
Het stoot tegen de borst dat zoiets mogelijk is.
Daarbij, de universiteit wordt veroordeeld waardoor de persoon die de valse beschuldiging uit,
een enorme schadevergoeding krijgt.
Hoe is het mogelijk dat justitie in zo een negatieve spiraal terecht komt?
Uiteindelijk bij toeval, bij de pinken zijn en met geluk komt de werkelijkheid aan de oppervlakte en wordt Brian Banks geëxonereerd.
Het is een sprekend voorbeeld.
Het relevant aandacht te hebben voor het verschrikkelijk falen van justitie.
10 The justice system has been hit by the windmill
25 Post Office used ‘unacceptable’ racist slur to describe Horizon scandal suspects
As if wrongly prosecuting hundreds of people wasn’t enough – now the Post Office has been forced to apologise for using racist terms to describe postmasters caught up in the Horizon computer scandal.
A newly revealed internal document shows fraud investigators were asked to group people based on their racial features – using language the Post Office has now admitted was “unacceptable”.
‘The Post Office Wrongful Convictions Scandal’ is living proof that something can happen to a person that should never happen.
It’s just one of the countless examples throughout the website.
In this case, however, it is a large-scale event and with deceptive intent.
It is distressing that a person can find themselves in such a situation.
This has nothing to do with justice anymore.
‘It’s a mess.’
In the Dutch language it is called
‘een foute boel’.
Outgoing Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte is “ashamed to the core” that he and his government could not prevent tens of thousands of people from falling into financial distress due to the allowances affair. This was caused by the Tax Administration, which had opened the hunt for alleged fraudsters. He said this after a lengthy interrogation by the parliamentary inquiry committee delving into the fraud approach of Rutte’s cabinets.
“I consider it a disgrace that we were not able to establish together before 2019 that a tragedy was unfolding,” Rutte said. He also specifically responded to Milton Moreira Moreno, the son of an affected mother. In a “very impressive” interrogation, Moreira Moreno revealed how the allowances scandal has permanently scarred his life. His youth was essentially taken away, said the now-adult victim to the inquiry committee.
Rutte acknowledges that it is “one of many” stories. In his interrogation, it once again became clear how the relentless approach of the Tax Administration bypassed the top of the government. Rutte himself also missed signals, he admitted, although he emphasized again that the fraud hunt was happening “deep within the Tax Administration.” The harsh report from the National Ombudsman in 2017 was an alarm bell that passed him by, Rutte admitted.
Aftredend Nederlands premier Mark Rutte schaamt zich “de ogen uit de kop” dat hij en zijn regering niet hebben kunnen voorkomen dat tienduizenden mensen in de financiële ellende zijn gestort door de toeslagenaffaire. Dat kwam door de Belastingdienst, die de jacht op vermeende fraudeurs had geopend. Dat zei hij na een lang verhoor door de parlementaire enquêtecommissie die in de fraudeaanpak van onder meer Ruttes kabinetten duikt.
“Ik vind het een schande dat we er niet in geslaagd zijn om met elkaar vóór 2019 vast te stellen dat er zich een drama aan het voltrekken was”, zegt Rutte. Hij reageerde ook specifiek op Milton Moreira Moreno, de zoon van een gedupeerde moeder. In een “zeer indrukwekkend” verhoor deed Moreira Moreno uit de doeken hoe het toeslagenschandaal zijn leven voor altijd heeft getekend. Zijn jeugd is in feite afgepakt, zei de inmiddels volwassen gedupeerde tegen de enquêtecommissie.
Rutte erkent dat het een verhaal “uit vele” is. In zijn verhoor kwam andermaal naar voren hoe de nietsontziende aanpak van de Belastingdienst voorbij ging aan de top van de regering. Rutte zelf miste ook signalen, erkende hij, hoewel hij opnieuw benadrukte dat de fraudejacht zich “diep in de Belastingdienst” afspeelde. Het harde rapport van de Nationale Ombudsman uit 2017 was een alarmbel die aan hem voorbijging, gaf Rutte toe.
It raises eyebrows, in such a large-scale event involving tens of thousands of people and children, whose lives are made completely impossible, including the harsh report from the National Ombudsman. And then to claim that one did not know about such a thing and that the reality had not come to the surface here and there. Making such a claim does not sound credible for the outgoing Prime Minister Mark Rutte.
It seems like throwing sand in the eyes.
The Dutch childcare allowance scandal has similarities to the ‘The Post Office Wrongful Convictions Scandal’ in the UK, where postmasters were accused of something that wasn’t true. They knew exactly what was going on since 2007. Nevertheless, they persisted in their wrongdoing, with all the consequences that even led some people to take their own lives.
Het doet de wenkbrouwen fronsen, bij zo’n grootschalig gebeuren van tienduizenden. Mensen en kinderen, wiens leven compleet onmogelijk wordt gemaakt, inclusief het harde rapport van de Narionale Ombudsman. En dan zeggen dat men zoiets niet wist en dat de werkelijkheid niet her en der aan de oppervlakte zou gekomen zijn. Zoiets beweren klinkt niet geloofwaardig van de aftredende eerste minister Mark Rutte.
Het lijkt erop dat dit zand in de ogen strooien is.
De toeslagenaffaire in Nederland heeft raakpunten met de ‘The Post Office Wrongful Convictions Scandal’ in Groot-Brittannië, waarbij postmeester werden beschuldigd van iets die er niet was. Men wist sinds 2007 exact wat er aan de hand was. Des ondanks bleef men volharden in de boosheid, met alle gevolgen van dien, dat zelfs mensen uit het leven stapten.
11 The Environmental factors
The term “environmental factors” is here used in the sense of “external factors” or “external influences”.
The Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal
The Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal consists of the organised child sexual abuse that occurred in the town of Rotherham, South Yorkshire, Northern England from the late 1980s.
1,400 children were abused in Rotherham over a 16-year period. Victims as young as 11 were trafficked, beaten and raped. One girl said gang rape was ‘a way of life’ where she lived. But council staff did nothing for fear of being labelled racist.
A number of shortcomings in the Dutroux investigation caused widespread discontent in Belgium with the country’s criminal justice system, and the ensuing scandal was one of the reasons for the reorganization of Belgium’s law enforcement agencies and widespread allegations of corruption and infiltration of the Belgian justice system by a criminal enterprise. In the White March, 300,000 Belgian citizens protested the mishandling of the case. Michelle Martin was freed on parole in 2012 after 16 years in prison. Michel Nihoul died in 2019.
Sadly, this evil is still going strong this very day, even more so. You will be baffled about what is going on in our world if you just take your time to truly research things. Perhaps one of the most shocking elements of pedophilia and human trafficking is the fact that there are so many people who live in denial and shout “fake news”. It is our duty to unite and raise awareness.
Van Buitenen discovered that both the official investigation and its conclusions aimed solely at exonerating the government, its regulations, and supervision from any blame. The focus was not on discovering the truth but on steering toward a desired investigation outcome. This was to prevent billion-dollar claims. For this reason, the owners were put on the pillory with false statements and tampering with witness testimonies.
Please see more click the link
It all began on Saturday afternoon, when 22-year-old Mamoudou Gassama was walking home from the famous Gare du Nord station. He came upon a crowd of panicked people, staring in terror at a 4-year-old boy who was suspended in mid-air from a fourth-floor balcony. With no thought for his personal safety, Mamoudou leapt up and began to scale the building with exceptional ease, earning himself the nickname “Spider-Man”.
French President Emmanuel Macron (L) speaks with Mamoudou Gassama, 22, from Mali, at the presidential Elysee Palace in Paris, on May, 28, 2018. – Mamoudou Gassama living illegally in France is being honored by Macron for scaling an apartment building over the weekend to save a 4-year-old child dangling from a fourth-floor balcony.
Below are four videos in the English language. In the second video ‘Malian migrant is man of the hour’, there’s a studio discussion with Mamoudou. Globally, across all television channels, the event was world news. Listen to the wisdom of the 22-year-old in the second video. The wisdom of a boy who has never been to school. These are words that cannot be heard with dry eyes when he talks about his attitude and behavior towards a 4-year-old child in a life-threatening situation, which also changes his life in 30 seconds from a migrant without residency rights, who has undergone an unbearably difficult journey through the desert. No one knew where he was or if he was still alive. He is received by the president, receives the French identity card, and work…
12 In a nutshell
It’s not going well in the justice system, there is a structural problem. It is incomprehensible that someone who is completely out of line with a profile of wrongdoing can be brought into trouble, even if that person, however you look at it, is incompatible with an event. Nevertheless, the justice system can act completely arbitrarily without any hindrance.
It is incomprehensible that people come to stand against each other when there is absolutely nothing wrong.
This is what this first page of the website makes clear in numerous examples, in various circumstances.
The pain and damage caused by something that should never have arisen are irreversible.
As mentioned in the first words of point 1, ‘The Liam Allan case,’ it is the madness, the irrationallity, the nonsense that is the cause of such an uncomfortable, destructive, perverse occurrence.
A misguided or irrational state of mind.
How deranged must you be to falsely accuse someone out of the blue, and even go so far as to buy a hammer to harm yourself in order to falsely accuse someone? It’s just unimaginable.
Can justice really be abused so easily?
How is it possible that Liam Allan barely escaped at the very last moment, even though no prosecution was necessary? It’s incomprehensible in such a straightforward black and white case, especially considering that the police had the evidence in their hands… Prosecutor Jerry Hayes calls it sheer incompetence.
A failing justice system (a fault or weakness: Cambridge Dictionarty)
It can happen to anyone. The examples are numerous. It’s a kind of occurrence like Diederik Stapel (Part 2 of the website), Bernard L. Madoff, and countless others who create a mess. The religions have done this, as well as various authorities and trust figures who go wrong. It is inherently linked to a weak justice system that can easily be disrupted. Trust is a paradox, isn’t it? The website makes it clear, as in the more than 650 candid camera clips of about one and a half minutes each (generally at the bottom of each webpage). This first webpage provides a selection of such examples, it’s like history that was sometimes presented unvarnished.
People couldn’t believe it was possible, the ‘Mission Impossible’ for those 12 boys and their soccer coach in that cave in Thailand in 2018 during the monsoon season. Thousands worldwide did the impossible with success; the boys were sedated and wearing masks underwater, with the sedation needing to be repeated, in a race against time. After 18 days, they all made it out successfully. When you know the details of this ‘Mission Impossible,’ it deeply affects a person. It involved 3 hours of swimming with two divers over 2.5 km in challenging conditions.
In comparison, on the other hand, within the entities of justice and police, there are individuals who go to great lengths to knowingly and willingly accuse innocent people who were not even at the crime scene, falsely accusing them of something they have no involvement in and no knowledge of. These innocents endure the unimaginable suffering of years in prison, with exoneration being a rare occurrence.
Justice has a dark chapter, as becomes evident when you watch and listen to the endless series of videos on this website.
13 Justice is a kind of modern-day slavery
When you go through all those well-known examples on the website and when you realize what has been done with those people, through
a representation on paper, of which it is well known and was known that it has nothing to do with reality, and in this way tears these people away from the harmony of their lives.
It is chilling when the data from the examples run through your mind. It is a very bizarre behavior of those who are in control.
No clue, no piece of information, and no element can explain why those people end up in prison. It is the extreme situations of fraudulent justice or ‘a pervertion of justice’.
One of the fundamental purposes of a justice system is to protect people from others violating their legal interests. In cases that turn out to have resulted in wrongful convictions, it is the criminal system itself that victimizes persons who have not committed any crime but are punished nonetheless. “Deely concerning”
Fooled by the system
This is not justice
It is deeply reprehensible
It is modern-day slavery
Half Has Never Been Told
On Thursday, May 24, 2012 the Los Angeles Superior Court reversed Banks’ conviction and ended his nightmare of wrongful conviction.
When it comes to children, and you are confronted with what painfully happens to them, the issue is very clear and black-and-white. You cannot allow a child to be in a situation that deeply impacts their life. Furthermore, there is a societal responsibility to do what is necessary to return a child to a normal situation.
Moreover, when one has used the bag of tricks to disrupt justice, and you are dealing with fraudulent justice, there is an imperative duty to do everything necessary to resolve this.
27 Death Before Dying: Death Row Exoneree on Solitary Confinement
Back to menu IMPORTANT CONTENT Listening recommended Must
23 jul 2013
http://www.aclu.org/solitaryondeathrow
From 1994 to 2006, Anthony Graves spent at least 22 hours a day locked alone in a small cell waiting to die — all for a crime he did not commit. During those years, 400 other prisoners were also locked alone on Texas’ death row. Watch this video to hear Anthony’s story.
Transcript:
– Solitary confinement is driving men crazy. I don’t understand how someone can subject another human being to this type of punishment and think that it’s justified. It is totally inhumane. There’s no way around it. You know, you really don’t truly understand the impact of removing someone from human contact for years. It can even be for weeks, but it has a– it has a negative effect on that person. So the human contact, as I said, we’re built for that, and it’s so important. And it’s like– it’s like totally removing someone from society and putting them in a dark hole, right? And everybody’s walking over it, and he’s shouting from the bottom of that hole, but nobody hears him, you know? And it’s dark down there. It just drives you crazy. And I experienced that so many times, where I’m shouting; I’m there. I want– I want somebody to just, you know, come talk to me, you know, just shake my hand. Something, you know, because you urge for that. And I couldn’t get it. You know, so you have to start playing tricks with your own mind, you know, just to try to survive this here thing. I feel that I went through this to be here to share it with you all and let you all know that what we’re doing to prisoners and to guys in solitary confinement is totally inhumane. We’re driving people crazy. And this is our criminal justice system that’s supposed to serve and protect us. But we are literally driving men insane. And those that are already insane, we’re just putting them in the casket. That’s all we’re doing. There’s no rehabilitation. There’s no such thing as justice in an injust environment. You can’t get that.
28 What’s life like in solitary confinement? – BBC News
4 apr 2021 #BBCNews
What would it be like to spend years locked in a room the size of your bathroom?
Is the prolonged solitary confinement of thousands of Americans ‘torture’, or an essential tool to keep prisons safe?
The BBC’s Hilary Andersson meets prisoners who have spent years in solitary confinement in the US.
The metaphor of a millstone and the depths of the sea
The Bible contains a well-known passage that mentions the consequences of harming children, using the metaphor of a millstone and the depths of the sea. This passage can be found in the New Testament, specifically in the book of Matthew, chapter 18, verses 6-7 (Matthew 18:6-7):
But if anyone causes a young, believing person to sin, it’s better for them to have a heavy stone tied around their neck and be drowned in the sea. It’s a terrible thing for the world when people lead others into sin. Temptations will come, but it’s a terrible thing for the person who causes others to sin.
This passage emphasizes the seriousness of causing harm or offenses to children and the severe consequences that would befall those who do so, symbolized by the imagery of a millstone tied around the offender’s neck and being cast into the depths of the sea. It highlights the importance of protecting and nurturing the faith and well-being of children.
In simpler terms, it is saying that while wrongdoing is a part of life,
those who actively cause harm or lead others into sin will face severe consequences.
It’s a warning about the seriousness of leading astray or causing harm to those who are considered innocent, trusting, or vulnerable – such as children, but not limited to them. It’s an illustration of the severe consequences that should be faced by those who cause such harm, symbolized by the metaphor of having a millstone tied around one’s neck and being cast into the sea.
“A young, believing person” in scripture Matthew 18:6-7. This belief isn’t necessarily confined to a theological context but can extend to any situation where there’s a vulnerable trust or reliance on someone or something for guidance, support, or protection.
Protecting and nurturing this childlike trust or belief is emphasized in this verse, indicating the seriousness of safeguarding the innocence and vulnerability of those who trust in such a manner.
29 An appearance of reality, jaded, bewildering and surreal.
31 Exonerated member of ‘Central Park Five’ on his historic city council primary win
In 1989, Yusef Salaam was one of five teenagers arrested and wrongly imprisoned after the brutal rape of a jogger in New York’s Central Park. They were exonerated in 2002 when DNA evidence linked another person to the crime.
Now, some three decades later, Salaam has declared victory in a race for a New York City Council seat. Salaam joined Geoff Bennett to discuss the win.
30 Obama on AI, free speech, and the future of the internet
Back to menu IMPORTANT CONTENT
7 nov 2023 Decoder – The Verge
Former President Barack Obama sat down with The Verge’s editor-in-chief and Decoder host Nilay Patel to talk about AI, social networks, and how to think about democracy as both of those things collide.
The conversation, which took place just hours after President Joe Biden signed his executive order on AI, covers some of today’s biggest issues in tech and policy. Of course, we also had to ask Obama what apps he has on his homescreen. #AI #Technology #Podcast
Read more: https://www.theverge.com/e/23712912
0:00 Intro
0:30 Biden’s executive order on AI
05:38 Tech regulation & avoiding mistakes of social media
11:30 Why AI companies are asking for regulating
14:52 Silicon Valley’s pushback against regulation
17:35 AI rules and who’s responsible for following them
19:43 Should tech platforms be treated as common carriers?
22:57 Regulating around the First Amendment; copyright law
25:08 Red Lion v. FCC & the Fairness Doctrine
28:26 The rise of AI-generated social feeds
33:41 AI copyright lawsuits & labor effects
39:47 Obama’s experience using AI chatbots
41:39 Obama’s homescreen apps
IMPORTENT CONTENT Listening recommended
Prof Yuval Noah Harari about A.I.
Open A.I. Founder Sam Altman on Artificial Intelligence’s Future
Doctor Yusef Salaam – The Central Park Five
“Those who have been close to the pain have to have a seat at the table.”
A quick overview of the website
Baffling examples of extraordinary fraud
Living a lie – The Con Man – Truth and misinformation – No Conscience
The Birmingham Six – 1974 – Who cares?
The Church In Tatters The Nuremberg Trials
Jimmy Savile, Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein DSK…
Evil does exist – Cart before the horse – Bury your head in the sand
The desperate journey Manuel Mauro – 2011
Keeping up appearances Beat around the bush Magdeburg hemispheres
Life as it is Money makes the world goes round
Objective truth Go the extra mile That’s the last straw
Dictatorship The invasion of Ukraine by vladimir Putin
Innocent Project A perversion of justice
Wrongful convictions in the Netherlands
Justice delayed is justice denied: Princess Delphine van Saksen-Coburg
Toby the Devil – The Blue Wall of Silence That’s the last straw