Donald Trump ‘was the firestarter’ when he called for the death penalty in the 1989 Central Park jogger case, says Yusef Salaam, one of the wrongfully convicted Central Park Five: ‘To see that he has not changed his position of being a hateful person … what would this country look like with Donald Trump being the president? I can’t even imagine’
The Scottsboro Boys were nine young black men, falsely accused of raping two white women on board a train near Scottsboro, Alabama in 1931. Convicted and facing execution, the case of Charlie Weems, Ozie Powell, Clarence Norris, Olen Montgomery, Willie Roberson, Haywood Patterson, Eugene Williams, and Andrew and Leroy Wright sparked international demonstrations and succeeded in both highlighting the racism of the American legal system and in overturning the conviction.
When Justice Fails: Patterns of Injustice Across Time
English
Dutch
English
Throughout history, certain cases have exposed the fundamental flaws in justice systems. These cases, from the wrongful convictions of the Scottsboro Boys to the devastating ordeal of the Central Park Five, serve as stark reminders of how prejudice, corruption, and systemic failures can derail lives.
This page brings together powerful images, videos, and discussions that challenge our understanding of justice. From legal battles to public deception, each example raises urgent questions: What does it take to recognize injustice? How often do institutions fail the very people they are meant to protect? And what is the true cost when justice is denied?
Dutch
Wanneer Justitie Faalt: Patronen van Onrecht Door de Tijd Heen
Door de geschiedenis heen hebben bepaalde zaken de fundamentele gebreken in rechtssystemen blootgelegd. Van de onterechte veroordelingen van de Scottsboro Boys tot de aangrijpende beproeving van de Central Park Five – deze gevallen herinneren ons eraan hoe vooroordelen, corruptie en systemische fouten levens kunnen verwoesten.
Deze pagina brengt krachtige beelden, video’s en discussies samen die onze kijk op gerechtigheid uitdagen. Van juridische gevechten tot publieke misleiding, elk voorbeeld roept dringende vragen op: Hoe herkennen we onrecht? Hoe vaak falen instituties die juist bescherming zouden moeten bieden? En wat is de werkelijke prijs wanneer gerechtigheid wordt ontzegd?
They were looking at the case as a litmus test for justice The quote above a litmus test: minute 1:25 in the video below
1 Central Park Five member recalls Trump ‘He has not changed’
17 feb. 2016
Litmus test: someone’s decision or opinion about something that suggests what they think about a wider range of related things:
The president’s policy on abortion is regarded as a litmus test of his views on women’s rights.
Cambridge Dictionary
Lakmoesproef 1 scheikundige proef met lakmoes 2 onweerlegbaar bewijs – Van Dale
Litmus Test
English
Dutch
English
The phrase “litmus test” is a metaphor borrowed from chemistry. In science, a litmus test is used to determine if a substance is acidic or basic. The test gives a clear and immediate result.
In everyday language, a litmus test refers to a decisive test that determines whether something meets a certain standard.
It is often used in politics, law, or ethics to describe a situation where a specific case, event, or decision serves as a clear measure of fairness, justice, or principles.
In this example:
“They were looking at the case as a litmus test for justice”
🔹 This means they saw the case as a key test to determine whether justice would be served.
If the case was handled fairly, it would prove that the justice system was working correctly.
f not, it would show that the system was failing.
Dutch
De uitdrukking ‘litmus test’ is een metafoor die afkomstig is uit de scheikunde. In de wetenschap wordt een litmus test gebruikt om te bepalen of een stof zuur of basisch is. De test geeft een duidelijk en onmiddellijk resultaat.
In de dagelijkse taal verwijst een litmus test naar een beslissende test die bepaalt of iets aan een bepaalde standaard voldoet.
Het wordt vaak gebruikt in politiek, recht of ethiek om een situatie te beschrijven waarbij een specifieke zaak, gebeurtenis of beslissing als een duidelijke maatstaf dient voor eerlijkheid, rechtvaardigheid of principes.
In het voorbeeld:
“Ze beschouwden de zaak als een litmus test voor rechtvaardigheid.”
🔹 Dit betekent dat zij de zaak zagen als een sleutelmoment om te bepalen of rechtvaardigheid daadwerkelijk zou worden gediend.
Als de zaak op een eerlijke manier werd behandeld, zou dat aantonen dat het rechtssysteem goed functioneert.
Als dat niet het geval was, zou het laten zien dat het systeem faalt.
3 Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson
A kind of justice without lawfulness
English
Dutch
English
The perception, the robust paradigm – the iconic Justice: blindfold and scales – crumbles impossibly and hopelessly, everything is thrown overboard and there is a drift towards meaninglessness. The pendulum swings too far in the wrong direction.
You end up in an inferior event of hiccups and dysfunctions, where nothing remains of justice.
A copy of the metaphor Diederik Stapel. Science fraud of an untouchable star academic with world fame. (Part 2 of the website).
There is not even an ordinary substantive question about the issue at hand: ‘is this really the case’. There is only the trap. The abuse and subversion of justice. A perversion of justice’, ‘pretended justice’, ‘preventing the law being put into action’.
An unfair event beyond shame, something without legitimacy, the paradox, supporting itself on nothing, crushing someone and riding roughshod over them.
Dutch
De perceptie, het robuust paradigma – het icoon Justitie: blinddoek en weegschaal – brokkelt onmogelijk en hopeloos af, alles wordt over boord gegooid en er is een afglijden naar een zinloos gebeuren. De slinger slaat te ver door in de verkeerde richting.
Wanneer je terecht komt in een minderwaardig gebeuren van haperingen en disfuncties, waarbij er niets overblijft van justitie.
Een kopie van de metafoor Diederik Stapel. Wetenschapsfraude van een onaantastbare steracademicus met wereldfaam. (Deel 2 van de website).
Er wordt niet eens een gewone inhoudelijke vraag gesteld nopens de kwestie die voorligt: ‘is dit wel zo’. Er is alleen de valstrik. Het misbruiken en het ontwrichten justitie. ‘A perversion of justice’, ‘pretended justice’, ‘preventing the law being put into action’.
Een unfair gebeuren de schaamte voorbij, iets zonder legitimiteit, de paradox, zich nergens op steunend, iemand verbrijzelen en over iemand heen rijden.
The packaging
A child is a child
4 CENTRAL PARK 5: New Documentary Examines Their Wrongful Imprisonment
At minute 4 in video 4 mentioning Scottsboro Boys of March 25,1931
Litmus test: A test to find out if a substance is acid or alkaline
Cambridge Dictionary
The “litmus test” is a metaphorical term used to refer to a benchmark or standard by which something is judged or evaluated. The key points of the litmus test can vary depending on the context in which it is used. Here are some common key points associated with the term:
Evaluation criteria: The litmus test typically involves a set of criteria that are used to assess or measure something. These criteria could be qualitative or quantitative, subjective or objective, and may vary depending on the specific context in which the term is being used. For example, in politics, a litmus test may refer to specific policy positions that a candidate must adhere to in order to gain the support of a particular group or party.
Pass/fail threshold: The litmus test often implies a binary outcome, where something either passes or fails the test. If an item meets the criteria or aligns with the standard being used as the litmus test, it is considered to have passed, whereas if it falls short of the criteria, it is considered to have failed.
Indicator of suitability: The litmus test is often used to determine whether something is suitable or compatible with a particular ideology, belief system, or value set. It may be used to gauge alignment with certain principles, ideologies, or values, and to determine whether something is considered acceptable or unacceptable based on those criteria.
Simplified assessment: The litmus test is often used as a simplified way to evaluate complex issues or situations. It provides a quick and straightforward assessment based on predetermined criteria, which may not capture the nuances or complexities of the subject being evaluated.
Subjectivity and controversy: The litmus test can be subjective and may vary depending on the individual or group using it. Different people or groups may have different litmus tests, and there may be controversy or disagreement around the criteria being used, the pass/fail threshold, or the suitability of the test itself.
Rigidity vs. flexibility: The litmus test can be either rigid or flexible, depending on the context. Some litmus tests may have strict criteria and a clear pass/fail threshold, while others may be more flexible, allowing for interpretation or consideration of multiple factors.
Contextual relevance: The litmus test is often used within a specific context, such as politics, ethics, or social issues. The criteria used as the litmus test may be relevant to that particular context, and its applicability to other contexts may be limited.
Overall, the key points of the litmus test involve the use of criteria, pass/fail threshold, indication of suitability, simplified assessment, subjectivity and controversy, rigidity vs. flexibility, and contextual relevance. It’s important to consider the specific context and criteria being used when encountering the term “litmus test” in different situations.
6 We Tricked People into Breaking Our Laptops
12 sep. 2020
Welcome to the world-famous Just for Laughs Gags, we’ve been playing silly pranks on unsuspecting people in public and capturing hilarious reactions with hidden cameras.
Litmus test
1Chemistry: A test for acidity or alkalinity using litmus.
2A decisively indicative test.
‘effectiveness in these areas is often a good litmus test of overall quality’
a way of deciding whether something is successful or true (also acid test)
The outcome will be seen as a litmus test of government concern for conservation issues.
Oxford Dictionary