Why Innocent People Plead Guilty – Presumed Innocent

Innocent defendants might just want to put the case behind them and carry on with their life, even if they are convinced they will be exonerated at trial. Accepting a plea bargain may be a way to get closure while avoiding the anxiety and unpredictability of a trial

1 Why Innocent People Plead Guilty | Adnan Sultan | TEDxFurmanU

Back to menu


18 mrt 2018

The United States’ criminal justice system can be complicated. In this talk, Adnan Sultan, staff attorney for the Innocence Project, breaks down the complicated legal system and why innocent people plead guilty.

Cases involving detectives like Reynaldo Guevara in Chicago and Louis Scarcella in New York City have raised serious concerns about the integrity of the criminal justice system. These detectives were involved in numerous cases that have come under scrutiny for allegations of misconduct, including coerced confessions, falsified evidence, and wrongful convictions.

Reynaldo Guevara, for instance, has faced allegations of pressuring witnesses and suspects, leading to false confessions and wrongful convictions. His tactics and conduct have raised significant doubts about the legitimacy of certain convictions during his tenure.

Similarly, Louis Scarcella, a former New York City detective, was involved in cases that have been overturned due to allegations of coercing witnesses, using unreliable informants, and manipulating evidence. Several convictions tied to Scarcella have been questioned, leading to the review and overturning of some cases.

Cases involving detectives like Guevara and Scarcella highlight the potential dangers of misconduct within law enforcement, especially when it results in wrongful convictions and the denial of justice to individuals.

2 Seven murder convictions linked to CPD Detective Reynaldo Guevara tossed

Back to menu

10 aug 2022

Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx announced Tuesday that she will not fight the exonerations. CBS 2 Political Investigator Dana Kozlov reports.

Seven murder convictions linked to CPD Detective Reynaldo Guevara tossed


Disgraced former detective Reynaldo Guevara has been accused of framing more than 50 people for murder. Daniel Rodriguez is one of those people: when he was charged with being behind the wheel in a 1991 drive-by shooting, the state’s key witness testified at trial that he had been pressured by Guevara to identify Rodriguez. But Rodriguez was still sentenced to 25 years behind bars. Now, as prosecutors begin reviewing and dismissing many of Guevara’s cases, a reckoning has begun. // https://www.buzzfeed.com/melissasegur…

3 Kim Foxx: Former cop a ‘stain on our criminal justice system’

Back to menu
     IMPORTANT CONTENT    Listening recommended  Must


9 aug 2022


In a rare move, Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx has filed motions to clear eight more homicide convictions tied to a notorious former Chicago police detective.

4 New lawsuits filed against former Chicago cop bring old allegations to light

Back to menu

22 mrt 2023

David Lugo recounted spending more than two decades in prison, being denied a proper goodbye to family members along the way.

5 Why defendants plead guilty to crimes they didn’t commit

Back to menu

31 mei 2018

Two brothers wrongly convicted of murder were granted a new trial, but then they faced an excruciating decision: plead guilty to a lesser crime and go home as convicted felons, or risk trial and the chance of going back to prison. John Yang reports in this story produced by students at the University of Maryland’s Capital News Service, in collaboration with Injustice Watch of Chicago.

The passage from Luke 19:45-48 recounts a moment when Jesus entered the temple and found people engaging in activities that went against the sacred nature of the place. He drove out those who were buying and selling, emphasizing that the temple should be a house of prayer but had been turned into a place for dishonest dealings.

In real life, this story often serves as a lesson about reverence, respect, and the proper use of sacred spaces. It highlights the importance of maintaining the sanctity and original purpose of places or institutions that hold significance to individuals or communities. It’s a reminder to prioritize spiritual connection, reflection, and worship over materialistic or worldly pursuits.

Furthermore, the reaction of the religious leaders to Jesus’ teachings and actions reflects how sometimes authority figures may resist change or challenge to the status quo, even when it’s for a greater good. The passage underscores the struggle between spiritual integrity and worldly interests, showing the clash between those who were focused on preserving their authority and Jesus, who aimed to restore the true essence of worship and connection to God.

Overall, this passage encourages us to consider whether our actions and attitudes align with the intended purpose of sacred spaces or principles in our lives, urging us to prioritize spiritual values over materialistic or self-serving pursuits.

The passage primarily emphasizes the sanctity of the temple and how its intended purpose was being compromised. Jesus was condemning the misuse of the temple for commercial activities, highlighting the discrepancy between what the temple should symbolize—a place of prayer and worship—and how it was being exploited as a marketplace.

While corruption isn’t the central focus of this particular passage, one could draw parallels between the misuse of the temple and the corruption that arises when sacred or significant places, institutions, or ideals are exploited for personal gain or purposes that deviate from their intended meaning or function. The essence of Jesus’ actions in the temple speaks more to the sanctity of the space rather than corruption, but it does indirectly address the issue of misplaced priorities and exploitation of sacred spaces.

The story in Luke 19:45-48 doesn’t specifically address the scenario of corrupt individuals falsely framing others, such as corrupt law enforcement officers. However, the broader lesson about misuse and misrepresentation of sacred places or principles can still apply in different contexts, including the abuse of authority and the creation of false narratives about individuals.

In the case of corrupt individuals, like dishonest law enforcement officers framing someone, parallels can be drawn with the actions of those who were exploiting the temple in the biblical passage. Both involve a misuse of authority and a deviation from the intended purpose or ethics of their roles. Just as Jesus sought to restore the sanctity of the temple by exposing its misuse, there’s an underlying theme of seeking justice, truth, and integrity in the face of corruption or false accusations.

The core lesson in situations like this might revolve around seeking fairness, truth, and the proper use of authority. It’s about ensuring that the systems in place, including law enforcement, uphold justice and truth rather than being used to manipulate or falsely accuse individuals. The passage doesn’t directly address this scenario, but its broader message about righteousness, integrity, and the appropriate use of sacred spaces can be applied in various contexts where there’s a misuse of power or authority.

You have made from the house of my father a den of thieves.” This is indeed a reference to the passage in Luke 19:45-48 where Jesus enters the temple and finds people engaging in commercial activities, which he refers to as turning the temple into a “den of thieves.”

In the Dutch language, “de schagenaars” refers to the traders or sellers in the temple. The phrase “Je hebt van het huis van mijn vader een rovershol gemaakt” emphasizes Jesus’ condemnation of the inappropriate use of the temple for commerce rather than prayer, likening it to a place for thieves instead of a sacred space.

This quote is used to highlight Jesus’ disapproval of how the temple was being utilized for activities that contradicted its intended purpose. It speaks to the need for reverence and respect in places of worship or significance, urging people to uphold the sanctity of these spaces rather than exploiting them for personal gain.

6 Behind Closed Doors: Corruption in High Places

Back to menu

29 dec 2023

Behind Closed Doors: A film about corruption in high places and those who enable it. Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) are people who hold a public function and as a result present higher risks of being involved in bribery or corruption. Offshore leaks have revealed repeatedly that PEPs use British finance and British offshore jurisdictions to launder their wealth, hide their wealth and re-invest that wealth back into the global financial system. London is the place where they buy property, where they take legal action against their critics and where they live when they fall from grace. But what happens when a developing country fights back and attempts to get Britain to return the money that it claims has been stolen?

Director : Michael Oswald

7 Car Club Surprise Prank

Back to menu

28 mrt 2011

Good samaritans giving a hand to a pretty girl come back to their car only to find a club on their driving wheel. A presentation of the Just For Laughs Gags. The funny hidden camera pranks show for the whole family. Juste pour rire les gags, l’émission de caméra caché la plus comique de la télé!