Temujin Kensu, also known as Fred Freeman, is a man who claims to have been wrongfully convicted for a crime he did not commit. Here are some key points related to his case:
Background: Temujin Kensu was convicted for the 1986 shooting of Scott Macklem outside a Michigan shopping mall. He was sentenced to life in prison without parole.
Alibi and Lack of Physical Evidence: Kensu maintains his innocence and asserts that he was approximately 465 miles away from the crime scene in a different state when the shooting occurred. He claims there is no physical evidence linking him to the crime.
Inmate Testimony: The conviction against Kensu was largely based on the testimony of an inmate who claimed that Kensu confessed to him while they were both in jail. Kensu’s defense argues that this testimony was unreliable and potentially coerced.
Ballistics Evidence: The ballistics evidence presented during Kensu’s trial was initially reported to be a match to the bullets recovered from the crime scene. However, later examinations and expert opinions have raised doubts about the reliability of this evidence.
Efforts for Reconsideration: Kensu’s case has garnered attention from organizations and individuals advocating for criminal justice reform and wrongful convictions. Several appeals and requests for reconsideration of his case have been filed over the years.
Ongoing Legal Battle: Despite various attempts to overturn his conviction, Kensu’s legal battle for exoneration has been challenging. His case highlights the complexities and difficulties often faced by individuals seeking to prove their innocence after being wrongfully convicted.
1 Justice Incarcerated, The Frederick Freeman Story
Gepubliceerd op 8 mei 2012
10 AWKWORD PRISON INTERVIEWS: Temujin Kensu, Innocent But Locked Up Three Decades in Michigan
28 dec 2020
“It’s unbelievable what goes on in here, and they hate me for fighting back”
I interviewed Temujin Kensu May 2020 about his innocence, and life in prison during COVID-19
Then on Christmas Eve, December 24, 2020, I called to check up. This is our conversation.
A court intrigue typically refers to a situation involving complex legal or political maneuvering, often marked by secrecy, deception, and power struggles within a court or legal setting. In the case of Temujin Kensu, also known as Fred Freeman, while it may not fit the traditional definition of a court intrigue, there are elements that can be associated with such a concept. Here are some key points that can be connected to a court intrigue:
Legal Controversy: The case of Temujin Kensu/Fred Freeman involves legal controversy, with allegations of wrongful conviction and questions about the fairness of the trial process. This controversy can create an atmosphere of intrigue as different parties fight to uncover the truth.
Complex Evidence: Court intrigues often involve intricate webs of evidence and conflicting testimonies. In the Kensu/Freeman case, there were issues regarding eyewitness identifications and the lack of physical evidence linking him to the crime scene. The complexity of the evidence adds to the intrigue as various parties analyze and interpret it differently.
Ineffective Defense: In court intrigues, the role of legal representation can be crucial. In Kensu’s case, there were allegations of ineffective defense, with claims that his attorney failed to present a strong defense or adequately challenge the prosecution’s case. This can create suspicion and fuel intrigue around the motives and actions of the defense.
Alleged Coercion and Manipulation: Court intrigues often involve elements of coercion, manipulation, or questionable tactics. In Kensu’s case, there were claims of witnesses being coerced or mistaken in their identifications. This raises questions about potential manipulation or misconduct within the legal process, adding intrigue to the overall narrative.
Advocacy and Activism: Court intrigues often attract attention from advocates, activists, and organizations interested in justice and fairness. In Kensu’s case, there have been ongoing efforts by various individuals and groups to uncover new evidence, challenge the conviction, and advocate for his release. These advocacy efforts can add layers of intrigue as different parties work behind the scenes to influence the legal proceedings.
It’s important to note that while elements of court intrigue may be present in the case of Temujin Kensu/Fred Freeman, the term “court intrigue” is not typically used to describe his specific case. However, the points mentioned above can help draw connections to the broader concept of court intrigues.
Temujin Kensu, An Innocent Man Locked Up for 36 Years, You Can Help
6 nov 2021 Crimeatorium
Temujin is still languishing behind bars as an innocent man. Temujin has spent more than half his life robbed of his freedom, his health is not good and he is not receiving the medical care he needs. Please follow the call to action below, and help the ongoing effort to get him out of prison and with his wife Paula, where he rightfully should be.
Temujin Kensu was 23 years old, when he was sentenced to life in prison for a crime he could not have committed. The shooting and murder of Scott Macklem occurred on November 5th, 1986 on the campus of St. Clair Community College in Port Huron Michigan. No DNA, hair fibers, murder weapon, or footprints were found on the scene, there was an ammunition box with latent fingerprints on it that didn’t belong to Temujin. Temujin has never owned a shotgun.
The traditional definition of a court intrigue refers to a complex and secretive plot or scheme involving political maneuvering, power struggles, and deceit within a royal court or a court of law. It often includes elements such as manipulation, backstabbing, conspiracy, and the pursuit of personal or political gain. Court intrigues typically revolve around individuals vying for power, influence, or control over the court and its proceedings. They may involve attempts to undermine rivals, gain favor with those in authority, or secure advantageous positions or outcomes.
In historical contexts, court intrigues were commonly associated with royal courts, where nobles, advisers, and other figures sought to advance their own interests by exploiting the politics and dynamics within the court. Such intrigues often involved plotting, secret alliances, espionage, and the dissemination of false information to achieve personal goals or undermine rivals.
In the legal context, court intrigues can refer to situations within a courtroom or legal proceedings where parties engage in strategic maneuvering, manipulation of evidence, or efforts to sway judges, jurors, or other legal authorities to achieve a desired outcome. This can involve tactics such as witness tampering, perjury, or attempts to discredit opposing parties.
Overall, court intrigues are characterized by the secretive and Machiavellian nature of the schemes and tactics employed by individuals within the court or legal setting, all driven by personal ambition, power struggles, or vested interests.
12 PART 2: Wrongly Convicted After 33 Years in Prison
13 Shortsighted Police Officer Gag
Police officer with serious eye problems arrests the wrong person in a corner store wine stealing case.
A presentation of the Just For Laughs Gags. The funny hidden camera pranks show for the whole family. Juste pour rire les gags, l’émission de caméra caché la plus comique de la télé!