Given the focus on issues such as unsafe convictions, including examples like the British Post Office Scandal, and a broad range of topics related to justice, ethics, and the law. ‘Justice with an open visor’ and its attributes of fairness, openness, honesty, and integrity.
1. “The phrase means that the boundaries between what is legal and what isn’t are sometimes hard to distinguish and not perfectly defined. It can also suggest that the law is sometimes complex and open to interpretation. In the context of a lawyer defending people who have done something wrong, it could mean that the lawyer is trying to show that their client’s actions fall within these unclear or complex boundaries.”
2. “The sentence essentially conveys that the lines between legality and illegality can be blurred and ambiguous, not sharply defined. It also implies that the legal system can be intricate and subject to interpretation. In the context of a lawyer defending individuals who have committed wrongful acts, it may signify the lawyer’s attempt to demonstrate that their client’s actions lie within these ambiguous or intricate boundaries.”
There is indeed a connection between the biblical story of the tree of good and evil and the concepts discussed by Michael Sandel in his book “Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do?” The story of the tree of good and evil explores themes of morality, choice, and the consequences of actions, which are central to discussions of justice and ethical decision-making.
Sandel’s book delves into various theories of justice and examines moral dilemmas to prompt readers to think critically about what constitutes the right thing to do in different situations. Just as the tree in the biblical story symbolizes the choice between good and evil, Sandel’s exploration of justice encourages readers to consider the implications of their actions and decisions on others and society as a whole.
This page is still under construction