Purpose and meaning of the website
The purpose of the website is to think deeply, to reflect, to ask questions, about what one cannot ignore.
The aim is to come to an understanding of justice, its limits, its restrictions, the human aspect of entities within the justice system, i.e. that as a human being you can become entangled in the wrong application of justice, like the row of blind men in the parable of the blind (The blind leading the blind).
Such missteps lead to the disruption, derailment and deficiencies of the essence of justice. There is the Achilles’ heel as defined in the website.
The axiom that justice is correct is overshadowed by influences of all kinds,
so that the pendulum swings too far with the consequences.
Harvard Professor Michael Sandel – who has devoted his entire life to his field – indicates what the chalk lines are, immanently connected to the life of a human being. His method, as he himself makes clear, is not like a preacher …
When you approach an issue rationally, from a distance, on the basis of a lack of information, you drown in confusion, with all the consequences that entails.
When, in contrast, the reality of life becomes tangible, when the dialogue of life is given a chance, when the naturalness of life is restored, you have a different approach and perspective than that scurrilous, reckless way of working. A healthy judgement arises towards the kind of justice that is contrary to the nature of life.
There is the comparison, the analogy between ‘justice & police’ and ‘science fraud’. There is the insight of what Diederik Stapel did, the first time he blatantly went into the field of fictitious data.
A judge can, by analogy, as in the aforementioned science fraud, write a text that is completely absurd, completely incongruous, visibly unreliable.
There is no shortage of examples in the website of something that one normally puts one’s trust in, until one finds that human error results in something happening that one has never thought of before.
- Liam Allan in the website is a metaphor for what cannot happen. You cannot be the object of justice if you are a person of good character.
- The Liam Allan case is about the fact that the justice system was stupidly wrong.
- Ditto, imagine being arrested like in Saint-Omer, Northern France, you spend 4 years in jail based on a fabricated story by one person. It happened to 13 people! There is no way of explaining such a thing.
- This is clearly not acceptable, this kind of miscarriage of justice. This is inadmissible.
- It is unacceptable for the justice system to be used as a plaything.
Such a thing should not be possible. However, it happens more often.
One has to ask oneself serious questions about justice, when the justice system goes all wrong with a person, who does not have the profile and cannot be put in the group of persons where he does not belong.
In other words, you are the object of justice and nothing is right.
Harvard Professor Michael Sandel makes it clear that this is not possible. One should pay attention to that.
Cfr. the text on the webpage Wrong destination
It is strange that a flight can land on a wrong destination. It happens, as explained in the video on the page Wrong destination.
That justice can be unreliable, incongruous and pointless is not something one expects, like the flight London Düsseldorf, which flies to the wrong destination London Edinburgh and the passengers are told to their surprise, that they will be welcomed in Edinburgh upon landing.
There is the red line that justice cannot cross. The missteps made stand out.
One cannot lie and speak the truth at the same time or deceive someone with the most preposterous lies (as mentioned in the Great Vandal under preposterous).
When one establishes that there is a continuing event, when one looks at the context. When justice falls into the trap and looks only at the last element, which is derailed, isolates this and proceeds in a totally incongruous manner, then you get something that is at odds with the reality of life, the dialogue of life, the naturalness of life. Such a thing is unreliable, senseless, absurd.
In the website, attention is paid to the monster of keeping up appearances, Hyacinth Bouquet, as lady Patricia Routledge calls herself in the explanation of the role she plays.
You can compare her, in my opinion, with a thermostat that constantly switches on and off.
The website pays attention to all kinds of atypical issues, which are the result of a manifestly flawed origin or a manifestly flawed event.
The crash of the 2 Boeing 737 max
Manuel Mauro, the most famous asylum seeker in the Netherlands and the Mailnese boy who spent 3 years on the road and climbed 4 floors from balcony to balcony in Paris to save a child.
And so on
An elementary form of fairness is that there should always be a point of contact, where you can go with mistakes as outlined on this webpage.
The dialogue of courtesy.
If everyone knows and fully realises that someone is completely wrong, and that this has been brought about by means of trickery in every fibre of the imagination, as a follow-up event – which could not possibly be there – because it is not compatible with the person, then the judiciary has a serious problem.
In other words, not every decision is correct and not all the information at one’s disposal is correct. When clear mistakes are made, they have to be corrected.
The dialogue of engagement.
It is a wrong phenomenon, if justice would be untouchable (as it was within the Catholic Church).
Conscience must respect truth.
The conscience will make false judgments when it fails to acknowledge the truth about things.
It Was My Mother Who Paid For My School Fees_A Short Inspirational Story