A. O. Scott looks at Jim Sheridan’s 1993 drama about terrorism and injustice.
“I am very sorry that they were subjected
to such an ordeal and such an injustice.”
In 2005, Tony Blair issued an apology to the Guildford Four
for the miscarriage of justice and publicly exonerated them.
Guildford Four inquiry papers show reconviction attempts – Emma Vardy
Educational – A Must-See
English
Dutch
English
The website presents in a positive context the fact that there is no shortage of examples where the justice system goes off track and falls into pitfalls.
Dutch
De website brengt in een positieve context het gegeven dat er geen tekort is aan voorbeelden waar justitie ontspoort en in de valstrik terecht komt.
1 Exploring the Pitfalls of Justice: A Closer Look at Systemic Failures
English
Dutch
English
In summary, the website offers a look at how the justice system often encounters significant pitfalls and failures. Through powerful examples, we explore cases where justice has gone astray, shedding light on the imperfections within the system.
On this page, featured content includes thought-provoking videos, such as the official trailer for In the Name of the Father – a gripping story based on the real-life wrongful convictions of the Guildford Four. Also included are critical insights from The New York Times and a report by Emma Vardy, highlighting ongoing efforts to rectify these miscarriages of justice.
Dutch
De Valstrikken van Gerechtigheid: Een Nadere Blik op Systeemfouten
Samenvattend biedt de website een blik op hoe het rechtssysteem vaak aanzienlijke obstakels en mislukkingen tegenkomt. Aan de hand van krachtige voorbeelden onderzoeken we gevallen waarin gerechtigheid van het pad afraakte en werpen we een licht op de imperfecties binnen het systeem.
Op deze pagina wordt onder andere content gepresenteerd, zoals de officiële trailer van In the Name of the Father—een aangrijpend verhaal gebaseerd op de echte onterechte veroordelingen van de Guildford Four. Ook worden kritische inzichten gedeeld van The New York Times en een rapport van Emma Vardy, waarin de voortdurende pogingen om deze gerechtelijke dwalingen recht te zetten, worden belicht.
2 The Very Nature of Binding Justice
English
Dutch
English
Injustice, above all, is defined by its impact.
It becomes a decisive moment that shapes the rest of your life.
It is the worst experience a person can endure.
Only in that moment can you truly comprehend what is happening.
Injustice is a feeling that defies words.
To prevent mistakes, there must be balance in decision-making – a fair process.
Answering the question of what justice requires is no simple task.
It’s nearly impossible to discuss justice without first addressing its purpose. – Aristotle
Dutch
De Ware Aard van Bindende Gerechtigheid
Onrecht wordt, boven alles, gedefinieerd door zijn impact.
Het vormt een beslissend moment dat de rest van je leven bepaalt.
Het is de zwaarste beproeving die een mens kan doorstaan.
Pas op dat moment kun je echt bevatten wat er gebeurt.
Onrecht is een gevoel dat zich niet in woorden laat vangen.
Om fouten te voorkomen, moet er evenwicht zijn in besluitvorming – een eerlijk proces.
De vraag beantwoorden wat gerechtigheid vereist, is geen eenvoudige opgave.
Het is bijna onmogelijk om over gerechtigheid te spreken zonder eerst het doel ervan te benoemen. – Aristoteles
Page Description
“In a nutshell” is a commonly used expression that conveys the idea of summarizing or simplifying a topic, concept,
or information into a concise & accessible form
3 The Guildford Four: When Justice Fails Twice
4 ‘In the Name of the Father’ | Critics’ Picks | The New York Times
3 In the Name of the Father Official Trailer #1 – Daniel Day-Lewis Movie (1993) HD
The full story of the Guildford Four:
A grave miscarriage of justice
Gerry Conlon was just 20 and served 15 years.
How can you cope with such unspeakable suffering?
4 Justice in a Blink: When Life Changes Instantly
2 Hot Girl Exposes Hairy Chest Prank Just For Laughs Gags
How a court decision can change everything in an instant –
just like the unexpected twist in a candid camera prank.
The expression “in a nutshell” is often used to summarize or provide a concise overview of a larger topic or concept. The key points associated with this expression are:
Conciseness: “In a nutshell” is used to provide a brief and condensed version of a more extensive topic or concept, typically in a single sentence or phrase.
Simplification: It is used to simplify complex ideas or information into a more easily understandable form that can be quickly grasped.
Summary: It serves as a summary or a synopsis of a larger topic, capturing the main points or essence of the subject matter.
Clarity: It is used to clarify or emphasize the most important aspects of a topic, stripping away unnecessary details or complexity to focus on the core message.
Introduction: It can also be used as an introduction to a more detailed explanation or discussion, providing a brief overview before delving into further details.
Metaphorical imagery: The phrase “in a nutshell” evokes the image of something being encapsulated in a small nutshell, suggesting that the information or idea is presented in a compact and easily digestible form.
Overall, “in a nutshell” is a commonly used expression that conveys the idea of summarizing or simplifying a topic, concept, or information into a concise and accessible form.
In a nutshell
Very briefly, giving only the main points:
“What went wrong?” “In a nutshell, everything.”
Cambridge Dictionary
5 The Post Office Scandal
Post Office Inquiry. You’re worried aren’t you Ms Van Den Bogerd?
Back to menu IMPORTANT CONTENT
10 mei 2024 The papers say
Post Office Inquiry. You’re worried aren’t you Ms Van Den Bogerd? She seems very worried about answering the put to her by Edward Henry KC at the Post Office Inquiry. She is arrogantl and quite dismissive of the Inquiry. So is she being honest do you think?
Post Office Scandal: Gasps at Paula Vennell answer over historic subpostmaster convictions
Back to menu IMPORTANT CONTENT
Gasps from the gallery as Paula Vennells says she didn’t recall taking the advice of a PR Guide over whether the Post Office should look into historic subpostmasters cases. Chairman Sir Wyn Williams had to intervene.
‘Anything to say to her?’ Post Office investigator Stephen Bradshaw challenged over Horizon scandal
Back to menu IMPORTANT CONTENT Listening recommended Must ***
11 jan 2024
Post Office investigator Stephen Bradshaw challenged over his role in the Horizon scandal that saw many sub-postmasters jailed due to errors in an IT system.
Post Office Investigator denies behaving like a ‘mafia gangster’
Back to menu IMPORTANT CONTENT Listening recommended Must ***
5 The Post Office Scandal | IEA Podcast
19 jan 2024 IEA Podcast
The Post Office scandal shocked the nation, but does it reveal widespread problems with public sector departments?
ITV’s hit drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office revealed one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in UK history. Over 900 sub-postmasters and postmistresses were incorrectly prosecuted as a result of faulty software which made it look like funds were missing. The drama highlights the ways in which their lives were ruined by a faulty computer system, a failing justice system, and a reprehensible government cover-up. The scandal has raised serious questions about a cherished British institution, as well as a fundamental problem with government ownership: lack of accountability.
Join Matthew Lesh, Director of Public Policy & Communications at the IEA, and Henry Hill, Deputy Editor at ConHome, where they discuss this grotesque miscarriage of justice, and what it says about the nature of government due process.
6 The Post Office scandal: Lessons from the UK’s largest miscarriage of justice | The New Statesman
In 2019, the High Court ruled that the Horizon system was faulty and in 2020 the government set up a public inquiry. But this has had renewed national interest thanks to the ITV drama Mr Bates vs the Post Office which aired in the new year week, and has resulted in a major intervention by the government – which will introduce a blanket law to exonerate all those who were convicted.
Anoosh Chakelian, Will Dunn and Freddie Hayward discuss what we can learn from one of the country’s greatest miscarriages of justice.
