The intended audience includes those with a sense of humanity who value justice, honesty, and real-world insights. Explore the impact of justice misused.
1 When Justice Turns Into Injustice
The intended audience includes anyone with a sense of humanity and empathy, willing to truly understand how justice -or its absence – shapes the lives of millions. It is easy to remain indifferent if you don’t know the depth of injustice. But when you hear the stories of people, like those described in Nick Wallis’s book, people who were wrongfully convicted by the British Post Office in the most horrific ways, everything changes.
You read about the despair so overwhelming that some attempted to end their lives not once, but three times. You learn their names and witness how their lives were destroyed by the malicious actions of people who knowingly upheld a system that ruined the innocent. At that moment, you can no longer speak of ‘the Post Office scandal’ as merely a collection of words. It becomes much more – a deeply personal confrontation with injustice at its most harrowing and destructive level.
This confrontation is not limited to courtrooms or specific cases. Consider the 70,000 children working in the mines of India, often under life-threatening conditions. When you compare their reality to the lives of happy children in a loving family, the unimaginable gap in human experiences becomes painfully clear. This awareness not only stirs compassion but also raises the question: how can humanity accept that such conditions persist?
There is also a deeper layer: sometimes you feel guilty, even when you’ve done everything you could – when you’ve sacrificed yourself to save a life or help a child close to your heart. The feeling that you could have done more, even when you gave your all, is a painful testament to your humanity. It is this human experience that reminds us of the immense impact of injustice and why we cannot look away.
A court case is often about power and money. This is what makes the process so unjust, especially for those with the least resources. You need look no further than the story of Lee Castleton in the Post Office scandal. He won his case initially against the Post Office for its shortcomings, but the Post Office appealed. Without the means to afford a lawyer, he defended himself. Despite irregularities, he lost the case. The costs for the Post Office were over 300,000 pounds, which he was forced to pay, an amount that was, of course, impossible for him to cover. His house was sold, his business went bankrupt, and he lost his job. His life was shattered. This is the reality of injustice – and these are the realities we cannot ignore.
The stories and videos presented throughout the entire website not only expose the visible injustices but also confront you with the people and the pain behind them. They remind us that injustice is not confined to a courtroom or a country – it is all around us. Once you face this reality, you can no longer say, “That doesn’t concern me.”
Onrecht Laat Niemand Ongeschonden
Injustice Leaves No One Unscarred
De beoogde doelgroep omvat iedereen met een gevoel voor menselijkheid en empathie, die bereid is om werkelijk te begrijpen hoe rechtvaardigheid – of het gebrek eraan – het leven van miljoenen beïnvloedt. Het is gemakkelijk om onverschillig te blijven als je de diepte van het onrecht niet kent. Maar wanneer je de verhalen hoort van mensen zoals die in het boek van Nick Wallis worden beschreven, mensen die door het Britse Post Office op gruwelijke wijze ten onrechte werden veroordeeld, dan verandert alles.
Je leest over de wanhoop die zo groot was dat sommigen driemaal een einde aan hun leven probeerden te maken. Je leert hun namen kennen en ziet hoe hun levens werden verwoest door kwaadaardig handelen van mensen die bewust een systeem in stand hielden dat onschuldigen kapotmaakte. Op dat moment kun je niet meer spreken over ‘het Post Office-schandaal’ alsof het slechts een verzameling woorden is. Het wordt veel meer dan dat: een onvergetelijke confrontatie met onrecht op zijn meest schrijnende en verwoestende niveau.
Dit gevoel van confrontatie is niet beperkt tot rechtbanken of specifieke gevallen. Denk aan de 70.000 kinderen die in de mijnen van India werken, vaak onder levensgevaarlijke omstandigheden. Wanneer je de realiteit van hun leven vergelijkt met dat van gelukkige kinderen in een liefdevol gezin, besef je de onvoorstelbare kloof in menselijke ervaringen. Deze bewustwording roept niet alleen medeleven op, maar ook de vraag: hoe kunnen we als mensheid accepteren dat zulke omstandigheden blijven bestaan?
Er is nog een diepere laag: soms voel je je zelfs schuldig, ook al heb je alles gedaan wat je kon – zelfs als je jezelf hebt opgeofferd om te proberen een leven te redden of een kind te helpen dat je nauw aan het hart ligt. Het gevoel dat je méér had willen doen, terwijl je wist dat je alles hebt gegeven, is een pijnlijk bewijs van je menselijkheid. Het is deze menselijke ervaring die ons doet beseffen hoe groot de impact van onrecht werkelijk is en waarom we niet weg mogen kijken.
Een rechtszaak gaat vaak over macht en geld. Dit is wat het proces zo onterecht maakt, vooral voor degene die het minste heeft. Je hoeft niet verder te kijken dan het verhaal van Lee Castleton in het Post Office-schandaal. Hij won de eerste keer tegen de Post Office voor de fouten die het had gemaakt, maar de Post Office ging in hoger beroep. Zonder de middelen om een advocaat te betalen, moest hij zich zelf verdedigen. Ondanks de onregelmatigheden verloor hij de zaak. Het resultaat was een kostenpost voor de Post Office van meer dan 300.000 pond, die hij moest betalen, wat uiteraard onmogelijk was. Zijn huis werd verkocht, zijn bedrijf ging failliet, hij verloor zijn baan, en zijn leven veranderde compleet. Dit is wat onrecht aanricht in de praktijk – en dit zijn de realiteiten die we niet kunnen negeren.
De verhalen en video’s die doorheen de gehele website worden gepresenteerd, brengen niet alleen de uiterlijke misstanden aan het licht, maar confronteren je met de mensen en de pijn erachter. Ze herinneren ons eraan dat onrecht zich niet beperkt tot een rechtbank of een land; het is overal om ons heen. Wie deze realiteit onder ogen ziet, kan niet langer zeggen, “Dat boeit me niet.”
2 Unveiling the True Legacy of Rosa Parks
Rosa Parks, often called the “mother of the Civil Rights Movement,” sparked a historic push for racial justice in 1955 when she refused to give up her bus seat to a white passenger in Montgomery, Alabama. Although she had done nothing wrong, she was arrested and imprisoned, highlighting the profound injustice of segregation laws. Her quiet defiance led to the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a pivotal moment in the fight against racial inequality. Learn more about her story here.
Rosa Parks, vaak de “moeder van de burgerrechtenbeweging” genoemd, ontketende in 1955 een historische strijd voor raciale rechtvaardigheid toen ze weigerde haar busstoel af te staan aan een witte passagier in Montgomery, Alabama. Hoewel ze niets verkeerds had gedaan, werd ze gearresteerd en gevangengezet, wat de diepe onrechtvaardigheid van segregatiewetten blootlegde. Haar stille verzet leidde tot de Montgomery Busboycot, een cruciaal moment in de strijd tegen raciale ongelijkheid. Lees meer over haar verhaal hier.
The real story of Rosa Parks | The Marc Steiner Show
2 feb 2023 The Marc Steiner Show
Read the transcript of this episode: https://therealnews.com/rosa-parks-my…
Rosa Parks’s decades of activist experience have been overshadowed by a selective history of the Civl Rights Movement that ignores its roots in a longer, protracted struggle for justice. Biographer Jeanne Theoharis and documentarian Yoruba Richen join The Marc Steiner show to set the record straight on the many under-appreciated contributions of Rosa Parks.
Jeanne Theoharis is the author of The Rebellious Life of Mrs. Rosa Parks and a professor of political science at the Brooklyn College of the City University of New York.
Yoruba Richen is a film director and producer, and the co-director of The Rebellious Life of Mrs. Rosa Parks. She is the director of the documentary program at the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism of the City of New York.
Studio/Post-Production: Adam Coley
Pull the wool over someone’s eyes idiom: To deceive someone in order to prevent them from discovering something. Cambridge Dictionary
3 The Case of the Century: Truths About the US Jury System
The O.J. Simpson case, often referred to as the “Trial of the Century,” remains one of the most widely discussed and controversial legal proceedings in American history. From the dramatic courtroom battles to the questions surrounding the fairness of the trial, Simpson’s case has become a symbol of the flaws and complexities within the criminal justice system. For a deeper look at the case and its lasting impact, visit our full page on the O.J. Simpson trial here.
De zaak O.J. Simpson, vaak aangeduid als de “Rechtszaak van de Eeuw,” blijft een van de meest besproken en controversiële juridische procedures in de Amerikaanse geschiedenis. Van de dramatische rechtszaalgevechten tot de vragen rondom de eerlijkheid van het proces, de zaak Simpson is een symbool geworden van de gebreken en complexiteit binnen het strafrechtsysteem. Voor een dieper inzicht in de zaak en de blijvende impact ervan, bezoek onze volledige pagina over de O.J. Simpson-zaak hier.
1 The Truth About The US Jury System
26 feb 2018
Guilty or not guilty. This is how Americans have helped keep crime in check for two and half centuries. But the US jury system isn’t perfect.
For instance, it wasn’t until 1968 that women were allowed to serve on juries in all 50 states. And while it’s been illegal to exclude African Americans from jury duty for more than 135 years …… they remain dramatically underrepresented, even today.
Each year, over 30 million people are sent a summons in the mail. From that, an estimated 1.5 million are selected to serve on a jury. And it’s during that selection process when most of the problems emerge. Attorneys have a certain number of “strikes”, or peremptory challenges, where they can remove jury candidates without any explanation. For decades, it was perfectly legal to use these strikes on a discriminatory basis — and that’s exactly what prosecutors did.
2 Wat is er gebeurd met juryrechtspraak? – Suja A. Thomas
2 mrt 2017
Bekijk hier de volledige les: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/what-happen…
Tegenwoordig beslissen jury’s in de Verenigde Staten over minder dan 4% van strafzaken en minder dan 1% van civiele zaken die bij de rechtbank zijn ingediend. Tegelijkertijd neemt het aantal jurysystemen in andere landen toe. Wat is er gebeurd in de VS? En zou het wegvallen van jury’s positief kunnen zijn? Suja A. Thomas verdiept zich in beide kanten van dit dilemma.
Les door Suja A. Thomas, animatie door Globizco.
Wrongly imprisoned for murder or manslaughter? KU Leuven students search for possibly innocent convicts
A project at KU Leuven has tasked students from three different fields of study to analyze true murder cases where someone may have been wrongfully convicted. Based on their findings, a dossier can be compiled that could potentially lead to a new trial. The students are now looking for new cases to investigate.
Could it be possible that people in our country have been wrongfully convicted of a crime they didn’t commit? Officially, there have been no reported cases of judicial error in our country, but that doesn’t mean it has never happened. The KU Leuven students are working on a case where the convicted person maintains their innocence.
Where the justice system has closed all doors, the “Benefit of the Doubt” project conducts a new analysis of the investigation, available evidence, and possible scenarios. The project began as a pilot project two academic years ago but now aims to take off.
Every year, about ten master’s students from the fields of law, criminology, and forensic science spend a year studying a real murder or manslaughter case. The students study all the details of the case, each from their own expertise, to deliver a final judgment on the conviction.
Unlike in the United States, the students do not plead the case in court. However, the convicted person’s lawyer can subsequently decide to request a review of the case before the Commission for the Review of Criminal Cases (CHS), established in 2018.
The students are now looking for a new case to tackle. To be selected for the project, the complete dossier must be available with the consent of the convicted person and their lawyer. Cases can be reported through the project’s website.
Project supervisor Tamara De Beuf emphasizes that it is essentially an educational project that operates independently. “So, we do not work for the lawyers of the convicted person,” she told VRT NWS. “We investigate whether the conviction may have been wrongful and whether there are still possibilities to conduct investigations. We do not have contact with the lawyer, except to review the dossier.”
The exact number of people in Belgium who have been wrongfully imprisoned after a wrongful conviction or judicial error cannot be determined with certainty. “In America, there is a database showing that 3,307 people have been acquitted who were previously wrongfully convicted,” De Beuf told Belga. “In the Netherlands, 11 people have been recognized as wrongfully convicted, and in Germany, 31. It can be expected that there are similar numbers in Belgium, but there may also be differences,” she said. “The legal system is not entirely the same: for example, in Belgium, we work with a jury for murder cases, while the Netherlands does not.”
The idea for the project originated at KU Leuven following a research project in the Netherlands called “Reasonable Doubt.” “Reasonable Doubt” started in 2003 at Maastricht University and now runs at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Onterecht in de cel voor moord of doodslag? Studenten KU Leuven zoeken mogelijk onschuldig veroordeelden
Een project van de KU Leuven laat studenten uit drie verschillende studierichtingen waargebeurde moorddossiers analyseren, waarbij iemand mogelijk onterecht veroordeeld is. Op basis daarvan kan een dossier samengesteld worden dat eventueel tot een nieuwe strafzaak kan leiden. De studenten zijn nu op zoek naar nieuwe zaken die ze kunnen onderzoeken.
Kan het dat mensen in ons land onterecht zijn veroordeeld voor een misdrijf dat ze eigenlijk niet hebben gepleegd? Officieel is er in ons land nog geen gerechtelijke dwaling gerapporteerd, maar dat wil niet zeggen dat het nog nooit is gebeurd. De studenten van de KU Leuven gaan slag met een zaak waarbij de veroordeelde de onschuld blijft volhouden.
Daar waar het rechtssysteem alle deuren heeft gesloten, maakt het project “Voordeel van de twijfel” een nieuwe analyse van de gestelde onderzoeksdaden, de beschikbare bewijsmiddelen, en de mogelijke scenario’s. Het project is al twee academiejaren geleden in proefproject gestart, maar wil nu echt uit de startblokken schieten.
Elk jaar is een tiental studenten uit de richtingen Rechten, Criminologie en Forensische Wetenschappen een jaar lang aan de slag gegaan met een waargebeurd moord- of doodslagdossier. De studenten, allemaal masterstudenten, bestuderen alle details van de zaak, elk vanuit hun eigen expertise, om een eindoordeel af te leveren over de veroordeling.
In tegenstelling tot in de Verenigde Staten is het niet zo dat de studenten de zaak zelf voor de rechtbank gaan bepleiten. De advocaat van de veroordeelde kan nadien wel beslissen om een herziening van de zaak te vragen bij de in 2018 opgerichte Commissie Herzieningen in Strafzaken (CHS).
De studenten zijn nu op zoek naar een nieuwe zaak om hun tanden in te zetten. Om voor het project geselecteerd te kunnen worden, moet het volledige dossier beschikbaar zijn met akkoord van de veroordeelden en hun advocaat. Via de website van het project kunnen zaken aangemeld worden.
Tientallen onterecht veroordeelden
Projectbegeleider Tamara De Beuf benadrukt wel dat het in essentie een onderwijsproject is dat in alle onafhankelijkheid werkt. “We werken dus niet voor de advocaten van de veroordeelde”, zegt ze aan VRT NWS. “We zoeken uit of er veroordeling eventueel onterecht is gebeurd. En of er nog mogelijkheden zijn om onderzoeksdaden te stellen. We hebben geen contact met de advocaat, behalve om het dossier in te kijken.”
Hoeveel personen er in België onterecht in de gevangenis zijn beland na een onterechte veroordeling of gerechtelijke dwaling, is onmogelijk met zekerheid vast te stellen. “In Amerika bestaat een database waaruit blijkt dat 3.307 mensen zijn vrijgesproken, die eerder onterecht waren veroordeeld”, zegt De Beuf daarover aan Belga.
“In Nederland zijn er 11 personen erkend als onterecht veroordeelden, in Duitsland 31. Het valt te verwachten dat het in België om gelijkaardige aantallen gaat, maar er zijn ook verschillen mogelijk”, klinkt het. “Het juridisch systeem is niet volledig gelijk: in België werken we bijvoorbeeld met een volksjury voor moordzaken, in Nederland niet.”
Het idee voor het project is aan de KU Leuven ontstaan in navolging van een onderzoeksproject in Nederland, dat “Gerede twijfel” heette. “Gerede twijfel” startte in 2003 aan de Universiteit Maastricht en loopt nu aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
4 Anthony Ray Hinton: 30 Years on Death Row for a Crime He Didn’t Commit
Anthony Ray Hinton’s story is one of the most harrowing examples of justice gone terribly wrong. Convicted of a double murder he didn’t commit, Hinton spent 30 years on death row in Alabama before finally being exonerated in 2015. His case highlights the devastating consequences of systemic racism, flawed legal processes, and the indifference of a justice system that often prioritizes convictions over truth. Through the videos below, explore the details of Hinton’s ordeal, his unwavering faith and resilience, and his inspiring efforts to advocate for reform and justice after his release. Learn more about her story here.
Het verhaal van Anthony Ray Hinton is een van de meest schrijnende voorbeelden van een rechtssysteem dat ernstig heeft gefaald. Ten onrechte veroordeeld voor een dubbele moord die hij niet had gepleegd, bracht Hinton 30 jaar door in de dodencel in Alabama voordat hij in 2015 eindelijk werd vrijgesproken. Zijn zaak belicht de verwoestende gevolgen van systemisch racisme, gebrekkige juridische processen en de onverschilligheid van een rechtssysteem dat vaak veroordelingen boven de waarheid stelt. In de onderstaande video’s ontdekt u de details van Hintons beproeving, zijn onwankelbare geloof en veerkracht, en zijn inspirerende inzet om na zijn vrijlating te pleiten voor hervormingen en gerechtigheid. Learn more about her story here.
3 Interview with a Death Row Inmate who was INNOCENT.
4 Anthony Ray Hinton Exonerated After 30 Years on Death Row
30 sep 2015
Anthony Ray Hinton walked out of the Jefferson County Jail a free man for the first time in 30 years at 9:30 a.m. on Friday, April 3, 2015. “The sun does shine,” Mr. Hinton said moments after being released following his exoneration. He was sentenced to death for a crime he did not commit.
“Race, poverty, inadequate legal assistance, and prosecutorial indifference to innocence conspired to create a textbook example of injustice,” EJI Director Bryan Stevenson said. “I can’t think of a case that more urgently dramatizes the need for reform than what has happened to Anthony Ray Hinton.”
“The Sun Does Shine: How I Found Life and Freedom on Death Row” is a memoir by Anthony Ray Hinton, a man who spent 30 years on death row for a crime he did not commit. Here are some key points from the book:
Wrongfully convicted: In 1985, Anthony Ray Hinton was arrested and charged with two counts of capital murder in Birmingham, Alabama. Despite having no physical evidence or witnesses linking him to the crime, Hinton was convicted and sentenced to death.
Life on death row: Hinton spent nearly 30 years on death row, enduring extreme isolation, brutal conditions, and the constant fear of execution. He also witnessed the executions of many of his fellow inmates.
Maintaining hope: Despite the grim circumstances, Hinton maintained hope and a positive attitude throughout his time on death row. He found solace in his faith, and used humor, friendship, and music to keep his spirits up.
Legal battle: With the help of the Equal Justice Initiative, Hinton’s case was eventually taken up by a team of lawyers who fought to prove his innocence. It took years of legal battles and multiple trips to the Supreme Court, but in 2015, Hinton was finally exonerated and released from prison.
Forgiveness: Despite the injustice he suffered, Hinton has chosen to forgive those who wrongfully convicted him and put him on death row. He now works as an advocate for criminal justice reform, and speaks out against the death penalty.
Overall, “The Sun Does Shine” is a powerful testament to the resilience of the human spirit, and a scathing indictment of a justice system that too often fails the innocent.
5 WATCH LIVE: Former death row prisoner Anthony Ray Hinton shares his path to freedom and forgiveness
Live gestreamd op 15 jun 2022
Anthony Ray Hinton was sentenced to death and held in solitary confinement for 28 years on Alabama’s death row before he was exonerated in 2015. On Wednesday, June 15 at 11:00 a.m. ET, join Washington Post senior critic-at-large Robin Givhan for a conversation with Hinton about the young readers edition of his book, “The Sun Does Shine,” in which he shares his long road to freedom and forgiveness.
Washington Post Live is the newsroom’s live journalism platform, featuring interviews with top-level government officials, business leaders, cultural influencers and emerging voices on the most pressing issues driving the news cycle nationally and across the globe. From one-on-one, newsmaker interviews to in-depth multi-segment programs, Washington Post Live brings The Post’s newsroom to life on stage.
5 Why the Innocent Plead Guilty: Judges Expose a Broken Justice System
6 Why the Innocent Plead Guilty
Federal Judges Jed S. Rakoff and Michael M. Baylson debate the public misconceptions and systemic failings of America’s criminal justice system as described by Judge Rakoff’s widely-read article in the New York Review of Books. Jeffrey Rosen, President and CEO of the National Constitution Center, moderates.
7 How a case gets to the US Supreme Court
28 mrt 2017
The only way is by surviving “the rule of four”.
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what’s really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com to get up to speed on everything from Kurdistan to the Kim Kardashian app.
Most often, the US Supreme Court grants or denies petitions to hear a case after reviewing a written request called a “petition for writ of certiorari”. Also called “the writ of cert”, it is reviewed by the Justices and granting the petition depends on whether or not it passes “the rule of four”. If it does, the case is probably one of three types: a case of national importance, a case in which a lower court decision has invalidated federal law, or a case involving a split decision in lower courts. Famously, Bush v. Gore was an example of national importance, Gonzales v. Raich was a case in which a lower court invalidated federal law, and Obergefell v. Hodges was selected by the Court in order to resolve a circuit split decision. By following this protocol of case selection, the Court has been designed to be reactive to legislative decisions made in other branches of government, as opposed to an active legislative body that seeks to create and institute new laws. Overall, the result of this design is a Court that prioritizes case selections that will enable them to enforce the uniformity of federal law throughout the country.
8 What It’s Like Being A Supreme Court Justice
20 jul 2018
Being a Supreme Court justice is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. But it’s still a job, and a grueling one, at that. Justices often evaluate thousands of cases a year, selecting dozens that will go before the court and making decisions that will impact millions of Americans.
The position does come with some decent perks, though, like lifetime employment, a generous retirement package and obvious prestige. As Justice Clarence Thomas once told California college students, being on the Supreme Court is an honor, but he wouldn’t say he actually liked it. In fact, he lamented, there’s no money and no privacy.
9 Why U.S. Supreme Court Justices Serve For Life – Cheddar Explains
25 aug 2022
In a new AP poll, 67% of Americans are in favor of Supreme Court term limits. After all, a supreme court justice is the ultimate referee of all U.S. law. And even if they’re in poor health or facing mental decline or just… older than most voters think they should be, they can just… keep… on… working.
So here’s what we want to know – why did the founding fathers ever think it was ok to give judges lifetime tenure? Did this part of the American experiment have its desired outcome? And what would it take for term limits to actually be implemented for the first time in the court’s 232-year history?
10 Why U.S. Supreme Court Justices Serve For Life – Cheddar Explains
25 aug 2022
In a new AP poll, 67% of Americans are in favor of Supreme Court term limits. After all, a supreme court justice is the ultimate referee of all U.S. law. And even if they’re in poor health or facing mental decline or just… older than most voters think they should be, they can just… keep… on… working.
So here’s what we want to know – why did the founding fathers ever think it was ok to give judges lifetime tenure? Did this part of the American experiment have its desired outcome? And what would it take for term limits to actually be implemented for the first time in the court’s 232-year history?
Further reading:
Why Supreme Court Justices Serve For Life
Was There An Armenian Genocide? bit.ly Why Does Armenia Hate Turkey? bit.ly
11 Former Justice Stevens on the 3 worst Supreme Court decisions of his tenure
6 Liam Allan: When Justice Fails, Lives Are Destroyed
Liam Allan’s life was turned upside down when he was falsely accused of rape, enduring two years of anguish before the case collapsed due to withheld evidence. His story exposes critical flaws in the justice system, where inadequate disclosure can lead to wrongful accusations and destroyed lives. In the video below, Liam reflects on the emotional toll and calls for urgent reforms to prevent such failures in the future. Learn more about her story here.
Liam Allan: Wanneer Gerechtigheid Faalt, Worden Levens Vernietigd
Het leven van Liam Allan werd volledig overhoop gegooid toen hij ten onrechte werd beschuldigd van verkrachting en twee jaar van zijn leven verloor voordat de zaak in elkaar stortte door achtergehouden bewijs. Zijn verhaal legt de ernstige tekortkomingen in het rechtssysteem bloot, waarbij ontoereikende onthullingen leiden tot onterechte beschuldigingen en verwoeste levens. In de onderstaande video reflecteert Liam op de emotionele schade en roept hij op tot dringende hervormingen om dergelijke misstanden in de toekomst te voorkomen. Learn more about her story here.
12 Collapse of rape trial has cost two years of my life’ – Luke Allan
17 dec 2017
©SKY 2017 – COPYRIGHT REMAINS WITH THE ORIGINAL OWNER AND IS USED FOR EDUCATIONAL & REFERENCE USE.
Liam Allan was accused of rape. However, the case against him collapsed and was thrown out of court after it emerged that a detective had failed to hand over text messages on the accuser’s phone – seriously undermining the case.
The 22-year-old law student is now considering suing the police and the Crown Prosecution Service.
Luke spoke to Sky’s Rebecca Williams.
13 Caught Cheating With Sexy Girl Prank – Just For Laughs Gags
3 jan. 2012