The Science of Justice

Page Description

Explore ‘The Science of Justice’ and how scientific principles apply to legal and ethical decisions. Learn about the impact of science on justice systems.

Ray Krone’s story is a powerful example of wrongful conviction in the U.S. He was sentenced to death in 1992 for the murder of a woman named Kim Ancona in Phoenix, Arizona, based largely on flawed bite mark evidence. After spending more than a decade in prison—two years of that on death row—Krone was exonerated in 2002 when DNA evidence proved his innocence and pointed to another man as the true perpetrator. His wrongful conviction was one of the first cases to bring attention to the unreliability of forensic evidence like bite marks.

After his exoneration, Ray Krone became a vocal advocate for criminal justice reform, particularly focusing on abolishing the death penalty. He now works with Witness to Innocence, an organization composed of death row exonerees that aims to educate the public about the flaws in the justice system and the dangers of wrongful executions. The group also works toward ending capital punishment in the United States. Witness to Innocence has been supported by The Atlantic Philanthropies (Atlantic), which was one of the largest funders of initiatives to abolish the death penalty in the U.S.

Atlantic has played a significant role in financing death penalty abolition efforts, including legal defenses, advocacy campaigns, and public education efforts aimed at revealing the inherent risks of wrongful convictions and state-sanctioned executions. Through its support of organizations like Witness to Innocence, Atlantic has helped elevate the voices of exonerees like Ray Krone, who can speak directly to the grave errors in the justice system.

Krone’s advocacy work and personal story have made him a key figure in the broader movement to end the death penalty across America.

1 Ray’s Story: A Death Penalty Mistake

Back to menu

 
3 apr 2012

Ray Krone was sentenced to death for a crime he did not commit. He has been proven innocent and exonerated, and now helps other “exonerees” share their stories of unjust sentences and close calls with state-sanctioned death penalties. Ray works for Witness to Innocence, which receives support from Atlantic, toward abolishing the death penalty throughout America. Atlantic is the largest funder of work to abolish the death penalty in the U.S. For more info see: http://www.atlanticphilanthropies.org…

2 Forensic Science Put Me on Death Row for My Teeth | Innocence Ignored

Back to menu

 

1 nov 2018

Most people are introduced to forensic science through TV and film, and because of this we have come to see forensic techniques such as ballistics, footprint analysis, and bite mark identification as foolproof methods for solving crimes. But many forensic science techniques were not developed by scientists. They were developed in crime labs by law enforcement professionals who needed methods for testing available evidence. These techniques were often subjective, and not run through the same kind of rigorous testing of traditional science.

As exonerations due to newly available DNA testing increased, it became clear that some forensic sciences had actually contributed to the wrongful convictions of innocent people. In this episode we meet two of those people, hear how forensic evidence contributed to their loss of freedom, and learn about how the recent disbanding of the National Forensic Science Commission could mean there’s very little oversight for a field that so desperately needs it.

3 Brains on Trial: Neuroscience and Law

Back to menu

20 okt. 2014

What if we could peer into a brain and see guilt or innocence? Brain scanning technology is trying to break its way into the courtroom, but can we—and should we—determine criminal fate based on high-tech images of the brain? Join a distinguished group of neuroscientists and legal experts who will debate how and if neuroscience should inform our laws and how we treat criminals.
 
The World Science Festival gathers great minds in science and the arts to produce live and digital content that allows a broad general audience to engage with scientific discoveries. Our mission is to cultivate a general public informed by science, inspired by its wonder, convinced of its value, and prepared to engage with its implications for the future.
 

Original program date: June 1, 2013
MODERATOR: Alan Alda
PARTICIPANTS: Anthony D. Wagner, Jay N. Giedd, Nita A. Farahany, Jed S. Rakoff, Kent Kiehl

Alan Alda’s Introduction 00:05

Participant Introductions 2:05

Brain imaging that can read your mind. 04:11

Can we trust what technology is telling us? 6:23

Can the brain imaging tell the difference between reality and imagination? 12:15

When does this information come into the courtroom? 14:43

fMRI and what it does. 18:22

Information bias and technology. 24:41

Printing images of your thoughts. 36:19

Teaching a computer the brain patterns to know it all. 39:30

Jed S. Rakoff, Kent Kiehl and Jay N. Giedd join the conversation. 46:21

Studding the adolescent brain. 48:13

How much is age a factor in sentencing? 53:25

Should we introduce mandatory brain scanning into criminal sentencing? 57:19

The influence of peer pressure on decision making. 1:02:50

Creating a mobile scanning unit for prisons. 1:08:45

If the presents of others in decision making is dangerous, how does a prison atmosphere effect the danger? 1:15:12

If someone is a psychopath should they just be given longer sentence? 1:22:25

What are the goals for the future of brain scanning and the legal system? 1:27:11

4 The Science Of Justice: Fudged Forensics & Faulty Witnesses

Back to menu

24 sep. 2014

Think the American criminal justice system is an impartial arbiter of innocence and guilt? Prepare to get a heaping dose of reality, as journalist Jim Dwyer, Innocence Project founder Peter Neufeld, forensic scientist Mechthild Prinz, psychologist Saul Kassin and law professor Ekow Yankah talk about uncertainty in the courtroom at the World Science Festival event, “The Science of Justice: A Matter Of Opinion?”

5 Saul Kassin: “False Confessions”

7 sep. 2010

Saul Kassin discusses the remarkable phenomenon of false confessions in criminal investigations—which are far more common than one might expect. His research examines voluntary false confessions, as well as the influence of the interrogation setting, and the authority of the confession in the criminal justice system.
 
Professor Kassin is a Distinguished Professor of Psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. This interview is part of Vera’s Neil A. Weiner Research Speaker Series. For more information, please visit: http://www.vera.org/services/neil-wei…
 
The Vera Institute of Justice is an independent, nonprofit research and policy organization that combines expertise in research, demonstration projects, and technical assistance to help leaders in government and civil society improve the systems people rely on for justice and safety.
 
For more information about the Vera Institute of Justice, please visit: http://www.vera.org/

6 Human Head Alive In Jar, Knocking Biker’s Head Off, Bird Flies Out Of Cage Prank

15 feb. 2017

 

Filmed in Montreal, Quebec Welcome to the world-famous Just for Laughs Gags channel, where we pull public pranks on unsuspecting Montreal residents and tourists.