All we’re trying to do is help people cut down on their screen time. Live in the moment guys!
Page Description
Explore ‘pitting somebody against somebody’ and how misuse of justice can manipulate and harm individuals through legal exploitation and ethical issues.
English
Dutch
English
The phrase “pit somebody against somebody” evokes images of conflict, division, and manipulation. In the context of legal and ethical battles, it represents how individuals can be set up against each other, often through the misuse of justice. This manipulation isn’t just about creating enemies; it’s about exploiting systems designed to serve fairness, turning them into tools of control and harm. Whether in courtroom drama or in the world of corporate or political power struggles, the consequences can be devastating, tearing lives apart and perpetuating injustice. This page explores the profound impact of such exploitation, where human beings are not only caught in the crossfire but are often victimized by a system that should be protecting them.
Dutch
Iemand Tegen Iemand Opzetten
De uitdrukking “iemand tegen iemand opzetten” roept beelden op van conflicten, verdeeldheid en manipulatie. In de context van juridische en ethische strijd, vertegenwoordigt het hoe individuen tegen elkaar kunnen worden uitgespeeld, vaak door misbruik van gerechtigheid. Deze manipulatie gaat niet alleen over het creëren van vijanden; het gaat over het uitbuiten van systemen die bedoeld zijn om eerlijkheid te waarborgen, en ze om te vormen tot instrumenten van controle en schade.
Of het nu in rechtszalen gebeurt of in de wereld van bedrijfsmatige of politieke machtsstruggles, de gevolgen kunnen verwoestend zijn, levens kunnen worden vernietigd en onrecht kan standhouden. Deze pagina onderzoekt de diepgaande impact van dergelijk uitbuiten, waar mensen niet alleen in de vuurlinie komen, maar vaak het slachtoffer worden van een systeem dat hen zou moeten beschermen.
English
Dutch
English
When justice provides the opportunity for someone – who appears to be an agitator – to use a pretext to manipulate the legal system where it is not possible, in order to inflict a calvary upon someone.
- Is there no shame in society?
- Is such a circus still acceptable in this day and age?
- Does no one question the ease with which this possibility can be exploited?
- Does one not see that the essence of life is violated?
- Is it acceptable to send justice into the field with levers to bash in someone’s life like a crowbar?
Dutch
Wanneer justitie de mogelijkheid biedt voor iemand – die de aanblik krijgt van een stokebrand – bij middel van een voorwendsel, om justitie te gebruiken, waar het niet mogelijk is, om op die manier iemand een calvarie aan te doen.
- Is er dan geen schaamte in de samenleving?
- Is zo’n circus in elkaar steken nog van deze tijd?
- Stelt men zich dan geen vragen dat die mogelijkheid moeiteloos kan gebruikt worden?
- Doorziet men dan niet dat er inbreuken gebeuren tegen de essentie van het leven?
- Is het toelaatbaar dat men justitie in het veld stuurt met hefbomen om in te beuken en bij middel van een breekijzer het leven van iemand kapot te maken?
Voorbeeld: execution by mistake
7 feb 2020
Two Short Stories To Give You Hope In Your Life – is another Dare to do. Motivation Original Video that will give you advice and courage in difficult situations. Sit back, relax and take 5 minutes out of your day to get inspired by these stories
Listen to your heart…be happy…don’t give up and always believe!
To put someone or something in opposition or competition with someone or something else:
That talk show is always pitting men against women.
to put someone or something in opposition or competition with someone or something else:
That talk show is always pitting men against women.
Cambridge Dictionary
2 ‘Dynamite’ secret contract exposes Post Office and Fujitsu deal
22 dec 2025
A new document – a secret contract with Fujitsu – blows open the Post Office scandal which saw hundreds of innocent post masters prosecuted.
The Horizon IT scandal saw men and women who’d run Post Offices up and down the country persecuted – and many prosecuted – for false accounting and theft.
They’d always said they were innocent – that the Horizon computer system was faulty, that the accounts must have been altered.
The Post Office maintained for decades both things were untrue. Tonight, we reveal the document that shows the postmasters were right, and the Post Office and Fujitsu knew all about it.
3 Horizon Scandal Just Got Worse – New Evidence Emerges
23 dec 2025
We already know that the Post Office lied to court in prosecuting hundreds of innocent Sub-postmasters. But new evidence shows that the Post Office knew even more about the bugs in their system years before it emerged in court. This should certainly see executives and lawyers doing prison time.
5 Secret tape reveals Paula Vennells was told of faulty Horizon software | ITV News
28 mrt 2024
A secret audio recording obtained by ITV News has revealed Post Office boss Paula Vennells was told directly about problems with the Horizon system and warned not to cover them up.
In a meeting with independent investigators from Second Sight on July 2, 2013, Ms Vennells was made aware of allegations that sub-postmaster branch accounts could be accessed remotely.
This is something the Post Office had denied for years.
6 Secret recording ‘final proof’ former Post Office boss Paula Vennells knew about Horizon issues
28 mrt 2024
A secret audio recording obtained by ITV News has revealed Post Office boss Paula Vennells was told directly about problems with the Horizon system and warned not to cover them up.
In a meeting with independent investigators from Second Sight on July 2, 2013, Ms Vennells was made aware of allegations that sub-postmaster branch accounts could be accessed remotely.
This is something the Post Office had denied for years.
7 Post Office Board knew about Horizon system flaws and exclusive document show insurers were alerted
18 jan 2024
As the Post Office Inquiry continues to hear testimony, more and more details are coming to light about who knew what when.
Back in 2019, the Post Office spent at least a-hundred-million pounds still defending the Horizon system when more than five hundred subpostmasters won their landmark settlement.
Tonight, we’ve seen documents that appear to show that the Post Office Board was aware of the Horizon system’s failures back in 2013 – indeed it was so worried about a potential miscarriage of justice that it alerted its insurers.
8 More secret tapes prove Post Office boss briefed on system backdoor
2 apr 2024
More shocking revelations from secret recordings obtained by Channel 4 News show that Post Office boss Paula Vennells was briefed about allegations of a “covert operations teams” – and that it could remotely alter sub-postmasters accounts from Fujitsu’s HQ without them knowing.That was in 2013. Seven years later, in letters to a parliamentary committee, Paula Vennells insisted she had been told by Fujitsu this was not possible.
Meanwhile the Post Office had taken innocent sub-postmasters to court, saying they must have stolen money when their accounts failed to add up – a miscarriage of justice that the tapes also reference.
English
Dutch
English
The video “‘Dynamite’ Secret Contract Exposes Post Office and Fujitsu Deal” reveals a significant development in the Post Office Horizon scandal. Here are the key points:
Secret Fujitsu Contract: A newly uncovered secret contract between the Post Office and Fujitsu sheds light on the details of the scandal and reveals that the Post Office was aware of the issues with the Horizon system.
False Accusations Against Postmasters: The video discusses how hundreds of innocent Postmasters were persecuted and many wrongfully prosecuted for false accounting and theft, despite their claims of innocence.
Horizon System Faults: The Postmasters had always maintained that the Horizon system was flawed, and that the accounts had been altered. For years, the Post Office denied this.
New Evidence Supports Postmasters’ Claims: The new document reveals that the Postmasters were right all along—both the Post Office and Fujitsu knew about the system’s faults.
The video exposes the truth that both the Post Office and Fujitsu were aware of the Horizon system’s problems, contradicting their long-standing denials and shedding light on the injustice suffered by the Postmasters.
Dutch
De video “‘Dynamiet’ Geheime Overeenkomst Blootlegt Post Office en Fujitsu Deal” onthult een belangrijke ontwikkeling in het Post Office Horizon-schandaal. Hier zijn de belangrijkste punten:
Geheime Fujitsu Overeenkomst: Een nieuw ontdekt geheim contract tussen de Post Office en Fujitsu werpt nieuw licht op de details van het schandaal en toont aan dat de Post Office op de hoogte was van de problemen met het Horizon-systeem.
Onterecht Beschuldigde Postmasters: De video bespreekt hoe honderden onschuldige Postmasters werden vervolgd en velen onterecht werden beschuldigd van valsheid in geschrifte en diefstal, ondanks hun beweringen van onschuld.
Fouten in het Horizon Systeem: De Postmasters hadden altijd volgehouden dat het Horizon-systeem gebrekkig was en dat de rekeningen waren gemanipuleerd. Jarenlang ontkende de Post Office dit.
Nieuw Bewijs Steunt Claims van Postmasters: Het nieuwe document onthult dat de Postmasters gelijk hadden – zowel de Post Office als Fujitsu wisten van de gebreken in het systeem.
De video legt de waarheid bloot dat zowel de Post Office als Fujitsu op de hoogte waren van de problemen met het Horizon-systeem, wat hun langdurige ontkenningen weerlegt en het onrecht blootlegt dat de Postmasters hebben geleden.
English
Dutch
English
The video titled “Horizon Scandal Just Got Worse – New Evidence Emerges” discusses new developments in the Post Office Horizon scandal. Here are the key points:
Post Office’s Lies in Court: The video highlights that the Post Office already knew about the bugs in their Horizon system but chose to lie in court while prosecuting hundreds of innocent Sub-postmasters.
New Evidence: Fresh evidence has emerged showing that the Post Office had knowledge of these issues long before they were revealed in court, further implicating their executives and legal teams.
Potential Legal Consequences: The new revelations suggest that top Post Office executives and lawyers could face prison time for their roles in covering up the truth.
The video underscores the systemic deceit and lack of accountability within the Post Office, with devastating consequences for the Sub-postmasters involved.
Dutch
De video “Post Office Schandaal Wordt Alleen Maar Slechter – Nieuw Bewijs Komt Naar Boven” bespreekt nieuwe ontwikkelingen in het Horizon-schandaal van de Post Office. Hier zijn de belangrijkste punten:
Leugens van de Post Office in de Rechtbank: De video benadrukt dat de Post Office al op de hoogte was van de fouten in hun Horizon-systeem, maar in de rechtbank loog tijdens de vervolging van honderden onschuldige Sub-postmasters.
Nieuw Bewijs: Er is nieuw bewijs naar voren gekomen waaruit blijkt dat de Post Office jarenlang op de hoogte was van deze problemen voordat ze in de rechtbank aan het licht kwamen, wat hen verder in diskrediet brengt.
Mogelijke Juridische Gevolgen: De nieuwe onthullingen suggereren dat topfunctionarissen van de Post Office en hun juridische teams mogelijk gevangenisstraf kunnen krijgen voor hun rol in het verbergen van de waarheid.
De video benadrukt de systematische misleiding en het gebrek aan verantwoordelijkheid binnen de Post Office, met verwoestende gevolgen voor de betrokken Sub-postmasters.
The phrase “pit somebody against somebody”
generally means to set two or more people or groups
in opposition to one another,
often with the intent of creating conflict or competition.
Here are some key points to keep in mind:
Competition: The phrase usually implies a sense of competition or rivalry between the two parties involved.
Conflict: It can often lead to conflict or confrontation between the parties, particularly if they are forced to compete or fight for the same resources or goals.
Manipulation: In some cases, the phrase may suggest a deliberate effort to manipulate or control the situation by setting the parties against each other.
Negative connotation: The phrase often carries a negative connotation, suggesting that it is not a healthy or productive way to resolve differences or achieve goals.
Potential outcomes: The potential outcomes of pitting someone against someone else can range from positive (e.g., healthy competition that motivates both parties to improve) to negative (e.g., destructive conflict that harms both parties).