please share. and join in the discussion at https://www.pigandcrown.co.uk/forum/
At minute 16:
Page Description
Discover how justice systems fail, from wrongful convictions to abuses of power, and explore the human cost of injustice in the name of justice.
Justice is often seen as the bedrock of a fair society — a system designed to protect the innocent, punish the guilty, and maintain social order. But what happens when this very system fails? When those entrusted to uphold justice become the perpetrators of its opposite? In this space, we will explore cases where the pursuit of justice has, paradoxically, resulted in profound injustice.
From wrongful convictions to institutional corruption, these examples reveal how easily the scales of justice can tip in the wrong direction. These stories raise a crucial question: How can a system meant to safeguard fairness cause such irreparable harm?
Justitie wordt vaak gezien als het fundament van een rechtvaardige samenleving — een systeem dat is ontworpen om de onschuldigen te beschermen, de schuldigen te straffen en de sociale orde te handhaven. Maar wat gebeurt er wanneer datzelfde systeem faalt? Wanneer degenen die justitie moeten handhaven, zelf onrecht begaan? Op deze pagina zullen we voorbeelden onderzoeken waarin de zoektocht naar gerechtigheid, paradoxaal genoeg, heeft geleid tot diepgaand onrecht.
Van onterechte veroordelingen tot institutionele corruptie, deze voorbeelden laten zien hoe gemakkelijk het rechtssysteem uit balans kan raken. Deze verhalen roepen een belangrijke vraag op: hoe kan een systeem dat eerlijkheid moet waarborgen, zulke onherstelbare schade veroorzaken?
Justice systems are designed to uphold fairness and protect the rights of individuals. However, even the most robust systems have their weakest links – whether it’s human error, flawed procedures, or systemic biases. These shortcomings can lead to grave consequences, including wrongful convictions, unchecked abuses of power, and a lack of accountability for those in authority.
Often, the weakest link is not the law itself, but the way it is applied – where assumptions, prejudice, and institutional interests can override fairness. In these instances, justice is not only compromised but perverted, turning a system meant to protect into one that causes harm.
Justice systems and institutions often rely on the integrity of individuals to function effectively. Yet, what happens when those entrusted with power – be they judges, academics, or officials – abuse that trust? Like the case of Diederik Stapel, a celebrated academic whose entire body of work was built on lies, we find that appearances can be deceiving. Status, prestige, and reputation can conceal the truth, creating a façade that hides unethical behaviour.
The real danger lies in how these façades prevent scrutiny. When the behaviour of powerful individuals goes unchecked, the system becomes complicit in perpetuating injustice. It is not just the flaws in procedures or laws, but the actions of those who hide behind their titles and manipulate the system for personal gain. This is the weakest link: when human deception, rather than truth, drives the very system meant to protect fairness.
Something unusual happened in the most unexpected way. It’s the kind of situation where your gut feeling tells you that something isn’t right. This is especially true when it involves someone known to be of good character. Take, for example,
the case of Liam Allan. Nobody asked Liam if he did it, because they knew he wasn’t that kind of person. Everything that happened to Liam Allan was illogical; none of it can be rationally explained. It was a false accusation. Liam should not have been prosecuted. The evidence was on the DVD with the download from the phone of the girl who accused him, but it was never reviewed.
The term “common denominator” refers to a shared characteristic or factor among different elements or groups.
There is something abnormal and completely incomprehensible about how young people can be taken out of their normal lives, completely unrelated to any wrongdoing, and without reason, have their lives ruined. Shocking cases like those of Brian Banks and Ryan Ferguson, who both spent years in prison before being exonerated, highlight this injustice.
Andrew Makinson – wrongly imprisoned for 17 years – unsafe conviction
Prosecutor Jerry Hayes
In court, Liam was supported by 15 people who had even taken a week off from work. In contrast, there was no one there for the other party.
Systemic Issues:
The possibility of ending up in prison.
Please listen the video below
6 jun. 2019
please share. and join in the discussion at https://www.pigandcrown.co.uk/forum/
In light of the injustices faced by individuals like Liam Allan, it is imperative that we hold the justice system accountable for its failures. The profound human toll of wrongful accusations and miscarriages of justice not only devastates the lives of the accused but also undermines public trust in the very institutions designed to protect us.
Accountability must extend beyond individual cases to encompass systemic reforms that ensure transparency, thorough evidence review, and adherence to due process. We must advocate for a justice system that prioritizes truth and fairness over expedience, recognizing that the stakes are far too high when lives and reputations hang in the balance.
This call for accountability is not just about seeking justice for those wrongfully accused; it is a plea to protect future generations from the same fate. Only through rigorous scrutiny and reform can we hope to build a justice system that truly reflects the values of fairness, integrity, and respect for human dignity.
Expedience
The situation in which something is helpful or useful in a particular situation, but sometimes not morally acceptable
Cambridge Dictionary
It captures the idea that something may be practical or beneficial in a specific context, even if it lacks ethical justification.
In many discussions, especially related to justice, the term is used to critique decisions or actions that prioritize short-term convenience over long-term fairness and morality.
In the context of a justice system, expedience might refer to the tendency to rush to a conclusion or to prioritize efficiency in handling cases, potentially at the expense of thorough investigation, due process, or the rights of individuals involved.
This aligns with your previous discussions about advocating for a justice system that values truth and fairness, emphasizing that expedient decisions can lead to serious injustices, such as wrongful convictions.
The expression “That’s a bit oversimplified” is used when someone makes a statement or judgment that lacks nuance or doesn’t consider all factors, like jumping to conclusions.
Looking at cases of wrongful convictions with blinders on – narrowing your view to simplistic explanations or focusing only on surface-level details – does an immense disservice to those whose lives have been ruined by the justice system. Since 1989, there have been 3,601 cases in the U.S. alone where individuals, later exonerated, had their lives reduced to chaos, an unimaginable mess.
These are people who were innocent, yet the system treated them as criminals, throwing them into a completely wrong context. Instead of addressing these injustices with critical thinking, we often see a rushed judgment, failing to recognize the deeper, existential questions at play. Justice should not be about artificially fitting people into a flawed system, but about understanding the full picture of their innocence.
Kort door de bocht
De uitdrukking ‘Kort door de bocht’ wordt gebruikt wanneer iemand een uitspraak of oordeel doet dat geen oog heeft voor nuance of niet alle factoren in overweging neemt, zoals wanneer men te snel conclusies trekt.
Het bekijken van zaken van onterechte veroordelingen met een paardenbril op – door je blikveld te vernauwen tot simplistische verklaringen of je alleen te richten op oppervlakkige details – doet enorm onrecht aan degenen van wie het leven door het rechtssysteem is verwoest. Sinds 1989 zijn er alleen al in de VS 3.601 zaken waarin mensen, die later zijn vrijgesproken, hun leven gereduceerd zagen tot een puinhoop.
Deze mensen waren onschuldig, maar het systeem behandelde hen als criminelen en plaatste hen in een totaal verkeerde context. In plaats van deze onrechtmatigheid met kritisch denkvermogen aan te pakken, zien we vaak een overhaast oordeel, waarbij de diepere, existentiële vragen over het hoofd worden gezien. Gerechtigheid zou niet moeten gaan over het kunstmatig inpassen van mensen in een gebrekkig systeem, maar over het begrijpen van het volledige plaatje van hun onschuld.
JERK pops little kid’s balloon
Gerry Monahan
2 jaar geleden (bewerkt)