An Affront to the Conscience of the Court

“An affront to the conscience of the court” is another variation of the expression, which specifically emphasizes
the offense or insult to the moral judgment or integrity of the court system itself.

Page Description

An in-depth look at a landmark case
that questions the ethical
and moral grounds
of judicial decisions
and their societal impacts.

1 Barriers to Justice: The Roadblocks to Fairness

Here’s a concise summary of the article “An Affront to Justice” by Joshua Rozenberg:


In April 2021, the Court of Appeal corrected a major miscarriage of justice involving 39 former Post Office staff who had been wrongfully convicted of dishonesty. These individuals lost their jobs, and some served prison sentences, with three having died before the ruling. The scandal exposed serious flaws in the system where the Post Office acted as complainant, investigator, and prosecutor, relying on the unreliable Horizon accounting system for convictions.

Historically, private prosecutions have been allowed, but safeguards are minimal. The article argues that private prosecutors, like the Post Office in this case, should not be self-regulated. It highlights the need for more stringent oversight, suggesting that private prosecutors should be held to the same standards as public ones, with mandatory oversight by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and regular inspections. Although some MPs support these reforms, the government remains hesitant, fearing that such changes might unduly limit the right to private prosecutions. The scandal underscores the necessity for better regulation to prevent future injustices.

Just For Laughs:Gags – Butcher

Back to menu

 
19 nov 2015

This page is still under construction