Puzzling – Perplexing – Bewildering
It describes something that is strange or unfamiliar, causing a sense of confusion or puzzlement.
Bewildered: Confused and uncertain
Arriving in a strange city at night, I felt alone and bewildered.
I came out of the movie a bit bewildered, but I enjoyed it.
Cambridge Dictionary
Bewildered: perplexed by many conflicting situations or statements; filled with bewilderment
1 The Liam Allan case
Notice
- Nobody has asked Liam if he did this, because they know he is not the person to do such a thing, as he explains in the BBC videos on this website.
- His mother says in these BBC videos: I wondered if I saw my son like a rose through a tinted glass.
- At the court hearings there were up to 15 people present to support Liam (they had even taken a week off). No one for the other side, and so on and so forth …
- The case is very simple. A lack of resources cannot be the reason, which Liam lists the reasons for, as well as his doubt about what happened regarding the DVD (disclosure of information, as it is officially called).
- There was not even a possibility to appeal, as the prosecutor explains in the video 4 in the first 4 minutes: where is the DVD? …
- The coincidence is that at the very last moment it is that prosecutor, Jerry Hayes, who steps in and turns the tide.
- Even if there is absolutely no charge or guilt, it sometimes becomes a matter of ‘make or break‘ in the justice system. This is simply absurd.
- It could happen to anyone.
- Are these not eight pieces of data that raise eyebrows?
After all, you cannot portray a person as something he clearly is not!
In such a situation, you have the unavoidable basic question: “Is there anything unclear?” - Relevant ‘Prosecuting barrister Jerry Hayes says the case against Liam Allan came very close to being a miscarriage of justice‘.
- This is an unimaginable tragedy, with the clear data in the case file, there should never have even been a charge.
- Justice sometimes resembles a disrupted public transport timetable during a strike, or a candid camera-like event where an innocent passer-by falls into the trap, harmlessly.
Bemerk
- Niemand heeft Liam gevraagd of hij dit gedaan heeft, omdat men weet dat hij de persoon niet is die zoiets doet, zoals hij uitlegt in de BBC video’s op deze website.
- Zijn moeder zegt in deze BBC video’s: ik vroeg me af of ik mijn zoon zag als een roos door een gekleurd glas.
- Op de zittingen voor de rechtbank waren er tot 15 personen aanwezig om Liam te steunen (ze hadden zelfs een week vrijaf genomen). Voor de tegenpartij niemand, enzovoort, enzovoort …
- De casus is de eenvoud zelve. Een gebrek aan middelen kan niet de reden zijn, waartoe Liam de redenen opsomt, eveneens zijn twijfel nopens wat er gebeurd is nopens de dvd! (‘disclosure of information’ zoals dit officieel noemt).
- Een mogelijkheid om in beroep te gaan was er zelfs niet, zoals de procureur in de video 4 in de eerste 4 minuten uitlegt: waar is de dvd? …
- Het toeval heeft gespeeld op het allerlaatste moment dat het die procureur is, Jerry Hayes, die invalt en het tij doet keren.
- Zelfs als er helemaal niets ten laste is of schuld, wordt het bij justitie soms: ‘erop of eronder’. Dit is gewoon absurd.
- Het kan iedereen overkomen.
- Zijn vernoemde acht-tal gegevens niet iets die de wenkbrouwen doen fronsen?
Je kunt immers een mens niet afschilderen als een persoon die hij overduidelijk niet is!
In zo’n situatie heb je toch de niet te ontwijken basisvraag: “Is er iets onduidelijk?” - Desbetreffend: ‘Prosecuting barrister Jerry Hayes says the case against Liam Allan came very close to being a miscarriage of justice‘.
- Dit is een ondenkbaar drama, met de overduidelijke gegevens in het dossier had het nooit tot vervolging en een rechtszaak mogen kunnen komen.
- Justitie lijkt soms op een verstoorde dienstregeling van het openbaar vervoer bij een staking, of een candid camera achtig gebeuren waarbij een onschuldige toevallige passant niets vermoedend in de valstrik trapt.
It is incomprehensible that a girl falsely accused
19-year-old Liam Allan with the consequences:
10 years in prison and life in a register.
Nor is it understandable that the judiciary fell into the trap,
such a thing is unforgivable.
Prosecutor Jerry Hayes is outspoken about the aberrations in the case – BBC video 2
It almost turned into a wrongful conviction!
The paradox the police had evidence beforehand that nothing was wrong
and could even not charge.
The case is ‘A perversion of justice’.
Liam Allan became a high-profile case.
There was a question to Theresa May about Liam Allan in The House of Commons.
2 It beggars belief: justice a deceptive construction!
There is more, when you carefully examine the examples in point 2 on the home page, you will be shocked that there are people who intentionally send someone to prison for an endless period of suffering over many years, without any hope of a way out. How can something like this exist, even 14-year-old children end up framed in prison!
Furthermore, when you watch and listen to certain videos, for example where Raphael Rowe speaks, you realize how the justice system works, namely by gradually adjusting the accusation so that something that does not correspond with the person can still be used in a deceitful file, and that it is just chance that Raphael Rowe, after 12 years wrongly behind bars as a 19-year-old boy, ultimately leaves prison very angry at the age of 32.
3 Justice being fooled as in a candid camera
In the context of the sentence, “Justice being fooled as in a candid camera,”
the key points about “A Candid Camera” are:
Deception: “A Candid Camera” is a reference to the concept of candid camera pranks or practical jokes, where people are deceived or tricked into believing something false or absurd for the purpose of entertainment. In the context of justice, it implies that deception is being used to mislead or misrepresent facts, leading to a false outcome in a legal case.
Unpredictability: “A Candid Camera” suggests that the deception in the justice system is unexpected, surprising, and catches people off-guard, just like a candid camera prank. It highlights the element of unpredictability and the suddenness of the deception in the justice system, which can result in a verdict that seems irrational or absurd.
Disruption: The sentence implies that the deception in the justice system serves as a lever or means to disrupt the normal functioning of the justice system. Just as a candid camera prank disrupts people’s expectations and perceptions, the deception in the justice system disrupts the fairness and integrity of the legal process, leading to a verdict that can have severe consequences on a person’s life.
Lack of reason, cause, or motive: The sentence suggests that the deception in the justice system, akin to a candid camera prank, lacks any reasonable or justifiable motive or cause. It implies that the deception is arbitrary and unjust, resulting in a verdict that seems devoid of logic or rationale.
Overall, the use of “A Candid Camera” in the sentence conveys the idea that deception in the justice system can be unexpected, disruptive, and irrational, leading to unjust outcomes that can have severe consequences on individuals involved.
This is still under construction.
Crazy Old Lady Driving Prank
